Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Cornish et al., 2016 - Google Patents

What we know about the public's level of concern for farm animal welfare in food production in developed countries

Cornish et al., 2016

View HTML
Document ID
5433192368195129486
Author
Cornish A
Raubenheimer D
McGreevy P
Publication year
Publication venue
Animals

External Links

Snippet

Simple Summary The production of food from animals poses many ethical challenges. This review explores what we know about different levels of concern for animal welfare in food production by such stakeholders as veterinarians, farmers, and the general public. Despite …
Continue reading at www.mdpi.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/01—Social networking

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Cornish et al. What we know about the public’s level of concern for farm animal welfare in food production in developed countries
Webster Animal welfare: Freedoms, dominions and “a life worth living”
Scandurra et al. Behavioral and perceptual differences between sexes in dogs: An overview
Vigors Citizens’ and farmers’ framing of ‘positive animal welfare’and the implications for framing positive welfare in communication
Sato et al. American citizens’ views of an ideal pig farm
Pejman et al. Should animal welfare regulations be more restrictive? A case study in eight European Union Countries
Gobbo et al. Dogs’ sociability, owners’ neuroticism and attachment style to pets as predictors of dog aggression
Krueger et al. Basic needs in horses?—a literature review
Sinclair et al. Farm animal welfare science in China—A bibliometric review of Chinese literature
Giersberg et al. Rearing male layer chickens: A German perspective
Colditz et al. A prototype tool to enable farmers to measure and improve the welfare performance of the farm animal enterprise: The unified field index
Mariti et al. Familiarity and interest in working with livestock decreases the odds of having positive attitudes towards non-human animals and their welfare among veterinary students in Italy
Hunt et al. Effects of environmental enrichment on dog behaviour: Pilot study
Cornish et al. Demographics regarding belief in non-human animal sentience and emotional empathy with animals: a pilot study among attendees of an animal welfare symposium
DuBois et al. Examining Canadian equine industry participants’ perceptions of horses and their welfare
Crovato et al. Purchasing habits, sustainability perceptions, and welfare concerns of Italian consumers regarding rabbit meat
Rowe et al. Advancing a “Good Life” for farm animals: Development of resource tier frameworks for on-farm assessment of positive welfare for beef cattle, broiler chicken and pigs
Sinclair et al. Attitudes of pig and poultry industry stakeholders in Guangdong province, China, to animal welfare and farming systems
Marr et al. Evidence for right-sided horses being more optimistic than left-sided horses
Valros et al. Animal ethical views and perception of animal pain in veterinary students
Krugmann et al. Are behavioral tests capable of measuring positive affective states in growing pigs?
Byrd et al. Of fur, feather, and fin: Human’s use and concern for non-human species
Deputte et al. Heads and tails: An analysis of visual signals in cats, Felis catus
Riggio et al. Feeding enrichment in a captive pack of European wolves (Canis Lupus Lupus): assessing the effects on welfare and on a zoo’s recreational, educational and conservational role
Christoph-Schulz et al. German citizens’ perception of fattening pig husbandry—Evidence from a mixed methods approach