Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Checka et al., 2012 - Google Patents

The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening

Checka et al., 2012

View PDF @Full View
Document ID
5394644508472221236
Author
Checka C
Chun J
Schnabel F
Lee J
Toth H
Publication year
Publication venue
American Journal of Roentgenology

External Links

Snippet

OBJECTIVE. Breast density is increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for the development of breast cancer, because it has been shown to be associated with a four-to sixfold increase in a woman's risk of malignant breast disease. Increased breast density as …
Continue reading at ajronline.org (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/345Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/321Management of medical image data, e.g. communication or archiving systems such as picture archiving and communication systems [PACS] or related medical protocols such as digital imaging and communications in medicine protocol [DICOM]; Editing of medical image data, e.g. adding diagnosis information
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/322Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3487Medical report generation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0012Biomedical image inspection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004Biomedical image processing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/22Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T3/00Geometric image transformation in the plane of the image, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a different image
    • G06T3/0031Geometric image transformation in the plane of the image, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a different image for topological mapping of a higher dimensional structure on a lower dimensional surface
    • G06T3/0037Reshaping or unfolding a 3D tree structure onto a 2D plane

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Checka et al. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening
Berg et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter-and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment
Carney et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography
Berg Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666
Venkatesan et al. Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables
Bent et al. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories
Crystal et al. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts
Lam et al. Imaging surveillance after primary breast cancer treatment
Brem et al. Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future
Liberman et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
Wang et al. Estrogen receptor–negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression
Nelson et al. Factors associated with rates of false-positive and false-negative results from digital mammography screening: an analysis of registry data
Houssami et al. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms
Rose et al. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study
Chang et al. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions
Gutierrez et al. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement
Berg Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next?
Warner et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer
Krizmanich-Conniff et al. Triple receptor–negative breast cancer: imaging and clinical characteristics
Shepherd et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer
Nelson et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Hubbard et al. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study
Lehman et al. Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age
Cupples et al. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program
Stomper et al. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old.