Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Chang et al., 2018 - Google Patents

Why do large‐scale land surface models produce a low ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration?

Chang et al., 2018

View HTML
Document ID
5339895404800455059
Author
Chang L
Dwivedi R
Knowles J
Fang Y
Niu G
Pelletier J
Rasmussen C
Durcik M
Barron‐Gafford G
Meixner T
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

External Links

Snippet

Most land surface models (LSMs) used in Earth System Models produce a lower ratio of transpiration (T) to evapotranspiration (ET) than field observations, degrading the credibility of Earth System Model‐projected ecosystem responses and feedbacks to climate change …
Continue reading at agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using infra-red, visible or ultra-violet light
    • G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • G01N21/35—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infra-red light
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V9/00—Prospecting or detecting by methods not provided for in groups G01V1/00 - G01V8/00
    • G01V9/007—Prospecting or detecting by methods not provided for in groups G01V1/00 - G01V8/00 by detecting gases or particles representative of underground layers at or near the surface
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30861—Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/24—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups earth materials
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01W—METEOROLOGY
    • G01W1/00—Meteorology
    • G01W1/10—Devices for predicting weather conditions
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/22—Fuels, explosives

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chang et al. Why do large‐scale land surface models produce a low ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration?
Yang et al. Remote estimation of terrestrial evapotranspiration without using meteorological data
Gao et al. Assessing and improving Noah‐MP land model simulations for the central Tibetan Plateau
Sakaguchi et al. Effects of soil wetness, plant litter, and under‐canopy atmospheric stability on ground evaporation in the Community Land Model (CLM3. 5)
Detto et al. Soil moisture and vegetation controls on evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous Mediterranean ecosystem on Sardinia, Italy
Niu et al. The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah‐MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local‐scale measurements
Ryu et al. Integration of MODIS land and atmosphere products with a coupled‐process model to estimate gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration from 1 km to global scales
Forbrich et al. Constraining marsh carbon budgets using long‐term C burial and contemporary atmospheric CO2 fluxes
Bitew et al. Evaluation of satellite rainfall products through hydrologic simulation in a fully distributed hydrologic model
Zheng et al. On the sensitivity of the precipitation partitioning into evapotranspiration and runoff in land surface parameterizations
Lawrence et al. Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model
Mazzotti et al. Resolving small‐scale forest snow patterns using an energy balance snow model with a one‐layer canopy
Decharme et al. Reconciling soil thermal and hydrological lower boundary conditions in land surface models
Wang et al. Responses of annual runoff, evaporation, and storage change to climate variability at the watershed scale
Niu et al. An observation‐based formulation of snow cover fraction and its evaluation over large North American river basins
Morillas et al. Improving evapotranspiration estimates in Mediterranean drylands: The role of soil evaporation
Robock et al. Evaluation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System over the southern Great Plains during the warm season
Zhang et al. Attribution of evapotranspiration changes in humid regions of China from 1982 to 2016
Xiao et al. Upscaling carbon fluxes from towers to the regional scale: Influence of parameter variability and land cover representation on regional flux estimates
Wang et al. Sensitivities of terrestrial water cycle simulations to the variations of precipitation and air temperature in China
Mahat et al. Testing above‐and below‐canopy representations of turbulent fluxes in an energy balance snowmelt model
Beer et al. Effects of soil freezing and thawing on vegetation carbon density in Siberia: A modeling analysis with the Lund‐Potsdam‐Jena Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ‐DGVM)
Kettridge et al. The ecohydrology of forested peatlands: Simulating the effects of tree shading on moss evaporation and species composition
Barnhart et al. The counteracting effects of snowmelt rate and timing on runoff
Bai et al. Using precipitation, vertical root distribution, and satellite‐retrieved vegetation information to parameterize water stress in a P enman‐M onteith approach to evapotranspiration modeling under M editerranean climate