Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Bosi et al., 2020 - Google Patents

A validated computational framework to predict outcomes in TAVI

Bosi et al., 2020

View HTML
Document ID
5153903074869995543
Author
Bosi G
Capelli C
Cheang M
Delahunty N
Mullen M
Taylor A
Schievano S
Publication year
Publication venue
Scientific reports

External Links

Snippet

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) still presents complications: paravalvular leakage (PVL) and onset of conduction abnormalities leading to permanent pacemaker implantation. Our aim was testing a validated patient-specific computational framework for …
Continue reading at www.nature.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3437—Medical simulation or modelling, e.g. simulating the evolution of medical disorders
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/24—Heart valves ; Vascular valves, e.g. venous valves; Heart implants, e.g. passive devices for improving the function of the native valve or the heart muscle; Transmyocardial revascularisation [TMR] devices
    • A61F2/2442—Annuloplasty rings or inserts for correcting the valve shape; Implants for improving the function of a native heart valve

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bosi et al. A validated computational framework to predict outcomes in TAVI
US11069136B2 (en) Pre-operative simulation of trans-catheter valve implantation
US11051885B2 (en) Method and system for determining a risk of hemodynamic compromise after cardiac intervention
Qian et al. Quantitative prediction of paravalvular leak in transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on tissue-mimicking 3D printing
EP3288479B1 (en) Method and system for determining a risk of cardiac conduction abnormalities
de Jaegere et al. Patient-specific computer modeling to predict aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Hellmeier et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of a biological and mechanical aortic valve prosthesis using patient‐specific MRI‐based CFD
CN112040908B (en) Patient-specific virtual percutaneous structural cardiac intervention methods and systems
De Vecchi et al. Left ventricular outflow obstruction predicts increase in systolic pressure gradients and blood residence time after transcatheter mitral valve replacement
Luraghi et al. In silico approaches for transcatheter aortic valve replacement inspection
Jolley et al. Toward predictive modeling of catheter‐based pulmonary valve replacement into native right ventricular outflow tracts
Kelm et al. Model-based therapy planning allows prediction of haemodynamic outcome after aortic valve replacement
Hokken et al. Clinical value of CT‐derived simulations of transcatheter‐aortic‐valve‐implantation in challenging anatomies the PRECISE‐TAVI trial
Anam et al. Validating in silico and in vitro patient-specific structural and flow models with transcatheter bicuspid aortic valve replacement procedure
US20220273369A1 (en) Method and system for determining a risk of hemodynamic compromise after cardiac intervention
Verstraeten et al. Generation of synthetic aortic valve stenosis geometries for in silico trials
Choe et al. Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement
Prisco et al. The native aortic valve reduces paravalvular leak in TAVR patients
Franke et al. Comparison of hemodynamics in biological surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An in‐silico study
Utsunomiya et al. Geometric changes in ventriculoaortic complex after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its association with post-procedural prosthesis–patient mismatch: an intraprocedural 3D-TEE study
Loureiro-Ga et al. Predicting TAVI paravalvular regurgitation outcomes based on numerical simulation of the aortic annulus eccentricity and perivalvular areas
Brouwer et al. The accuracy of patient-specific computer modelling in predicting device size and paravalvular aortic regurgitation in complex transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures
Carbonaro Development of numerical platforms for the design and optimization of transcatheter aortic valves
Palmer A computational tool to identify risk in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Catalano et al. On the Modeling of Transcatheter Therapies for the Aortic and Mitral Valves: A Review. Prosthesis 2022, 4, 102–112