Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

  issues2000.org
Home Issues Candidates Recent Grid Archive Senate House VoteMatch_Quiz The_Forum News
 Notebooks:   |   Bill   Sponsorships   Policy   Reports   Memberships/   Affiliations   Group   Ratings   Court   Rulings   Congress   Surveys 
Click on Group Ratings below for opinions of politicians' voting records....


Group Ratings>>
2020 Voting records: 116th Congress
2020 Surveys & Ratings: CC/PVS/AFA
2018 Surveys & Ratings: CC/PVS
Excerpts from Trump Impeachment reports (December 2019)
Bill sponsorships, 2018-2020 (116th Congress major legislation)
Bill sponsorships, 2016-2018 (115th Congress major legislation)
Ratings on members of 114th and 115th Congress (Non-profit groups' candidate evaluations)
Bill sponsorships, 2015-2016 (114th Congress major legislation)
Bill sponsorships, 2013-2014 (113th Congress major legislation)
Ratings on members of 112th and 113th Congress (Non-profit groups' evaluations of voting records 2011-2014)
Early bills from 113th Congress. Bill sponsorships and letters from early in 2013 in the U.S. House, U.S. Senate, and Governors.
2013 incoming House Freshmen surveys. Newly elected U.S. House members from the 2012 elections, rated by numerous organizations. (Same without older survey comparisons)
2012 Christian Coalition voter guide. Newly elected candidates from the 2012 House, Senate, and Gubernatorial elections.
Bills and ratings from 111th Congress and earlier (Bills 2009-2010 and earlier)
Surveys 2011: Latest survey update through 2011.
Surveys: Collection of all surveys in one summary.
2010 Christian Coalition voter guide. From the 2010 Congressional and Gubernatorial elections.
2010 Faith2Action.org voter guide. From "the nation's largest network of pro-family groups."
2010 Project Vote Smart: Congressional Political Courage Test.
Contract From America: 2010 House candidates' set of campaign pledges.
Contract With America: 1994 House candidates' set of campaign pledges.some
Additional Surveys and Notebooks.

Older Notebook archives:
2008 Presidential contenders
2008 Senate Signature Issues
2001-2012 Caucus Memberships / Affiliations
2000-2006 Group Ratings
1999-2007 Congressional Member Surveys
1999-2004 Public Letters
1998-2001 Resolutions
1994-2005 Policy Reports
1992-2000 Court Rulings
1990s-2008 Bill Sponsorships


Bill Sponsorships by 2008 Presidential Contenders:
Sen. Hillary Clinton
Sen. John McCain
Sen. Barack Obama
Rep. Ron Paul


Former Gov. Mitt Romney (R, MA)
No Apology
Rep. Paul Ryan (R, WI)
Young Guns
Pres. Barack Obama
The Audacity of Hope
V.P. Joe Biden
Promises to Keep
Former Rep. Ron Paul
End the Fed

Former Pres. George W. Bush
Decision Points
Former Gov. Sarah Palin (R, AK)
America By Heart
Secy. of State Hillary Clinton
Living History
Former Pres. Bill Clinton
My Life
Gov. Jesse Ventura
American Conspiracies

Site Map
Home
(Main page)
Issues
(Quotations organized by topic)
Leaders
(Quotations organized by politician)
Recent
(Most recent quotation for each person)
Candidate Grid
(Summary by candidate of positions on each topic)
  

International Issues  Domestic Issues   Economic Issues  Social Issues 
  Newsletter     Signup  
Email:
  
Zip:
    
Or click for More Info.
    
Foreign Policy Gun Control Budget & Economy Education
Homeland Security Crime Government Reform   Health Care
War & Peace Drugs Tax Reform Abortion
Free Trade Civil Rights Social Security Families & Children
Immigration  Jobs Welfare & Poverty Corporations
Energy & Oil  Environment Technology Principles & Values
Following are Group Ratings by independent political groups, which are used to indicate politicians' stances on the issues. We report each group's rating using their own terminology; and we try to balance liberal groups against conservative groups. Votes which include "VoteMatch Usage" are scored as VoteMatch quiz responses. Those without a VoteMatch usage are included only on each candidate's main issues page.
Abortion
Rating group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
06n-NRLC
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance or (2) by the NRLC, indicating a mixed record on abortion or (3) by the NRLC, indicating a pro-life stance Participating counts on VoteMatch question 1. Democrats: 231
Republicans: 226
Independents: 2
03n-NARAL
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record or (2) by NARAL, indicating a mixed voting record on abortion or (3) by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 1. Democrats: 248
Republicans: 275
Independents: 8
01-EL1
on Apr 11, 2001
Recommended by EMILY's List of pro-choice women Participating counts on VoteMatch question 1. Democrats: 58
Republicans: 0
Independents: 0

Civil Rights
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
06n-HRC
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by the HRC, indicating an anti-gay-rights stance or (2) by the HRC, indicating a mixed record on gay rights or (3) by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance Participating counts on VoteMatch question 3. Democrats: 234
Republicans: 226
Independents: 3
06n-NAACP
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by the NAACP, indicating an anti-affirmative-action stance or (2) by NAACP, indicating a mixed record on affirmative-action or (3) by the NAACP, indicating a pro-affirmative-action stance Participating counts on VoteMatch question 2. Democrats: 230
Republicans: 224
Independents: 2
03n-NAACP
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the NAACP, indicating a pro-minority advancement record or (2) by NAACP, indicating a mixed record on minority advancement or (3) by the NAACP, indicating an anti-minority advancement record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 2. Democrats: 0
Republicans: 0
Independents: 0
02n-ACLU
on Dec 31, 2002
(1) by the ACLU, indicating a pro-civil rights voting record or (2) by the ACLU, indicating a mixed civil rights voting record or (3) by the ACLU, indicating an anti-civil rights voting record (Not used in VoteMatch) Democrats: 227
Republicans: 236
Independents: 7

Corporations
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-COC
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the US COC, indicating a pro-business voting record or (2) by the US COC, indicating a mixed business voting record or (3) by the US COC, indicating an anti-business voting record (Not used in VoteMatch) Democrats: 247
Republicans: 275
Independents: 8

Crime
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
05n-NCJA
on Dec 31, 2005
(1) by the NCJA, indicating a "soft-on-crime" stance or (2) by the NCJA, indicating a mixed record on criminal justice or (3) by the NCJA, indicating a "tough-on-crime" stance Participating counts on VoteMatch question 9. Democrats: 230
Republicans: 226
Independents: 2
00n-CURE
on Dec 31, 2000
(1) by CURE, indicating pro-rehabilitation crime votes or (2) by CURE, indicating mixed votes on rehabilitation or (3) by CURE, indicating anti-rehabilitation crime votes Participating counts on VoteMatch question 9. Democrats: 208
Republicans: 206
Independents: 5

Drugs
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
06n-NORML
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by NORML, indicating a "hard-on-drugs" stance or (2) by NORML, indicating a mixed record on drug reform or (3) by NORML, indicating a pro-drug-reform stance Participating counts on VoteMatch question 19. Democrats: 188
Republicans: 180
Independents: 1
02n-HEMP
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by VOTE-HEMP, indicating a pro-hemp voting record or (2) by VOTE-HEMP, indicating an anti-hemp voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 19. Democrats: 25
Republicans: 15
Independents: 4

Education
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-NEA
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes or (2) by the NEA, indicating a mixed record on public education or (3) by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes Participating counts on VoteMatch question 7. Democrats: 247
Republicans: 275
Independents: 8

Energy & Oil
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
06n-CAF
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by the CAF, indicating opposition to energy independence or (2) by CAF, indicating a mixed record on energy independence or (3) by the CAF, indicating support for energy independence Participating counts on VoteMatch question 18. Democrats: 232
Republicans: 227
Independents: 2

Environment
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-LCV
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the LCV, indicating pro-environment votes or (2) by the LCV, indicating a mixed record on environment or (3) by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes Participating counts on VoteMatch question 18. Democrats: 247
Republicans: 274
Independents: 8

Families & Children
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-CC
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the Christian Coalition: a pro-family voting record or (2) by the Christian Coalition: mixed voting record on families or (3) by the Christian Coalition: an anti-family voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 4. Democrats: 248
Republicans: 275
Independents: 8

Free Trade
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
02n-CATO
on Dec 31, 2002
(1) by CATO, indicating a pro-free trade voting record or (2) by CATO, indicating a mixed record on trade issues or (3) by CATO, indicating a pro-fair trade voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 13. Democrats: 227
Republicans: 236
Independents: 7

Gun Control
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
02n-NRA
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record or (2) by the NRA, indicating a mixed voting record on gun rights or (3) by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 10. Democrats: 198
Republicans: 243
Independents: 7

Health Care
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-APHA
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record or (2) by APHA, indicating a mixed record on public health issues or (3) by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 5. Democrats: 247
Republicans: 275
Independents: 8

Homeland Security
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-SANE
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by SANE, indicating a pro-peace voting record or (2) by SANE, indicating a mixed record on military issues or (3) by SANE, indicating a pro-military voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 15. Democrats: 247
Republicans: 274
Independents: 8

Immigration
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
06n-USBC
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by USBC, indicating an open-border stance or (2) by USBC, indicating a mixed record on open borders or (3) by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance Participating counts on VoteMatch question 12. Democrats: 232
Republicans: 229
Independents: 2
03n-FAIR
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by FAIR, indicating a voting record restricting immigration or (2) by FAIR, indicating a mixed record on immigration issues or (3) by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration Participating counts on VoteMatch question 12. Democrats: 193
Republicans: 219
Independents: 7

Jobs
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-AFLCIO
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the AFL-CIO, indicating a pro-union voting record or (2) by the AFL-CIO, indicating a mixed record on union issues or (3) by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-union voting record (Not used in VoteMatch) Democrats: 248
Republicans: 275
Independents: 8

Principles & Values
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
06n-AU
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by the AU, indicating opposition to church-state separation or (2) by the AU, a mixed record on church-state separation or (3) by the AU, indicating support of church-state separation Participating counts on VoteMatch question 4. Democrats: 229
Republicans: 227
Independents: 2
04n-CFG
on Sep 21, 2004
(1) by the Club for Growth, strong pro-growth & targeted race or (2) by the Club for Growth, pro-growth but not targeted or (3) by the Club for Growth, pro-growth but not targeted (Not used in VoteMatch) Democrats: 0
Republicans: 36
Independents: 1
04n-MOVE
on Sep 21, 2004
by MoveOn for moderate progressive principles (Not used in VoteMatch) Democrats: 3
Republicans: 0
Independents: 8
00-LCR0
on Nov 7, 2000
Endorsed by Log Cabin Republicans; supports gay rights Participating counts on VoteMatch question 3. Democrats: 0
Republicans: 28
Independents: 1

Social Security
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
03n-ARA
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by the ARA, indicating a pro-senior voting record or (2) by the ARA, indicating a mixed record on senior issues or (3) by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record Participating counts on VoteMatch question 6. Democrats: 247
Republicans: 275
Independents: 8

Tax Reform
Endorsing group (click for details)Rating descriptionsVoteMatch UsageParticipants
06n-CTJ
on Dec 31, 2006
(1) by the CTJ, indicating opposition to progressive taxation or (2) by CTJ, indicating a mixed record on progressive taxation or (3) by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation Participating counts on VoteMatch question 11. Democrats: 233
Republicans: 226
Independents: 2
03n-NTU
on Dec 31, 2003
(1) by NTU, indicating a "Taxpayer's Friend" on tax votes or (2) by NTU, indicating "Satisfactory" on tax votes or (3) by NTU, indicating a "Big Spender" on tax votes Participating counts on VoteMatch question 11. Democrats: 246
Republicans: 274
Independents: 8


Reproduction of material from any OnTheIssues.org pages without written permission is prohibited.
Copyright © 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org , all rights reserved.
OnTheIssues.org 1770 Massachusetts Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140

E-mail us at:submit at OnTheIssues.org
(Editorial staff, for news and corrections)
Business information (Dr. Naomi Lichtenberg, for partnerships and advertising)
Political information (Jesse Gordon, for content and technical matters)
About Us (We report about campaigns; please don't write us if you want to reach any campaign!)
  Newsletter     Signup  
Email:
  
Zip:
    
Or click for More Info.