Steward requests/Checkuser/2017-11

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in November 2017, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Latest comment: 7 years ago21 comments11 people in discussion

Anonymous users from Timișoara@ro.wiki

Status: Not done

List of users: 2a02:2f09:31e0:78:40e0:5213:7f9f:3327 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2a02:2f09:3350:d4f:8df4:f020:7a40:57d9 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2a02:2f09:3050:13ed:10fc:677f:63bc:a4c5 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2a02:2f09:3060:c73:a892:62ff:86e:150e (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2a02:2f09:3370:1285:f408:25a:56ec:eda4 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2a02:2f09:3050:1011:f187:930b:a769:9f12 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2a02:2f09:3050:1011:d994:55eb:34b8:b30d (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2A02:2F09:33A0:798:E957:D6B7:4A35:93EB (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2A02:2F09:3060:D6C:4430:F54A:913E:BED4 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 2A02:2F09:3060:D6C:8141:7574:1FB6:888A (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Massive copyvios from these users. There is little doubt that they pass the duck test, but I would like to know for sure the UserAgent matches before I block such a large subnet (/18 in IPv6) --Strainu (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Not done I am sure how user agents are related to a possible block. Ruslik (talk) 19:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Username@xx.project

Status: Done

List of users: Đăng Đàn Cung (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): This might be nipponese dog calvero. 70.21.192.95 13:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Unlikely Ruslik (talk) 08:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

林浚辉@zh-classical.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 林浚辉 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 哲涵 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): They call themselves classmates and edit habits are more similar. WAN233 (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Unrelated from a checkuser point of view. Ruslik (talk) 08:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

अंशू ठाकुर@hi.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: अंशू ठाकुर (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); साधक अंशित (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: hi:वि:कठपुतली

Reason(s): Created account when first one was blocked, then start same article.--Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 17:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Additional information needed. At first glance I don't see any indication of abuse to the level that would warrant a check. RadiX ∞ 02:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

साधक अंशित created article about non-notable subject whose name was same as the account name. He also added same content on his user page. Twice he did that two things. He got blocked for 3 months. Then after 3 hours अंशू ठाकुर was created and by it first edit was to create article about the same subject in different name. By confirmation we would block this two accounts for indefinitely as per our policy.--Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 07:27, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Inconclusive There is not enough technical evidence to show a connection between the two accounts. -- Avi (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Suxyna@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Suxyna (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Eugenpetre0802 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vladdexterandrei (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Mariapetrescuu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sealview27 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Obvious self-promo and POV editing especially directed towards washing up the image of Romanian politician Dan Voiculescu. They constantly try to present the subject only the way he wants to be seen, citing and copying from media outlets of Intact Group, that Voiculescu controls. It may be of interest if these accounts are connected to the Intact Group and thus editing in a concealed conflict of interest, contrary to terms of use (Sealview27 is already known to have been concealing this conflict of interest). Andrei Stroe (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Mariapetrescuu and Sealview27 are

Stale. Suxyna, and Vladdexterandrei as well as Pisoi are

Likely to be associated with each other. They may be different people working from the same network. I am less sure about Eugenpetre0802 although an association is also

Possible. Ruslik (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Lerman Kruger@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Lerman Kruger (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): The user is under a topic ban covering biographies of living people, including (and especially) the article about himself. That article is being constantly edited by anonymous users with no other contributions. I am not going to list any IPs in this request, nor do I request those IPs to be published here, but I believe it is necessary to know how likely it is any of this editing is being done by an unauthenticated Lerman Kruger. Andrei Stroe (talk) 16:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

In the last 3 months there have not been any edits to the above mentioned article from the IP addresses belonging to Lerman Kruger. Ruslik (talk) 18:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

BukhariSaeed@en.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: BukhariSaeed (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: en:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#BukhariSaeed_standard_offer

Reason(s): CU for me. Please add comment to the given discussion after CU check. Thanks--Bukhari ^Talk 04:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Enwiki has own CU team. einsbor _talk 09:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Նարինե Խուդավերդյան@hy.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Նարինե Խուդավերդյան (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Karen Mnacakanyan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Arayik Hambardzumyan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): There is a hot discussion in Armenian Wikipedia concerning one non notable article deletion. 3 users have voted against the deletion and seems to have the same vocabulary in expressing their thoughts and the same misspellings. Please check these accounts. --@ջեօ 16:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed as well as Նարինե Խոդեդանյան. Ruslik (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! --@ջեօ 19:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Muhammad Ashiq Ali@ur.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Muhammad Ashiq Ali (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Famousvideomovies (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sixthlyhj (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: my wikidata talk page

Reason(s): Similar edits on non-notable articles for saving them (removing deletion tags etc). Please check these accounts. Thanks --Bukhari ^Talk 12:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed as well as Sherstan. Ruslik (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)