Meta:Requests for oversight/DerHexer
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- Link for the candidate: DerHexer (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)
Dear community, I would like to suggest DerHexer as new oversighter in Meta-Wiki. As a steward, He performed great number of hiding revs/logs on multiple Wikimedia projects. There would be no objection that DerHexer is a hard-working contributor. I believe DerHexer would do good jobs, and oversightship on him would be helpful for maintenance. Kwj2772 (msg) 11:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought about requesting oversight access on meta: several times to help out especially on Special:Log/globalauth (where are still several insulting and private informations publishing accounts visible) as long as bugzilla:18183 or bugzilla:18060 are not yet fixed; cf. SB. So if you want to me to do that it's fine, if you think meta: has enough local oversights it's fine, too. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support trusted hard working user. --Meno25 12:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support sure. Great user. It can't harm to have him with the tools. Barras || talk 12:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as nom. Kwj2772 (msg) 12:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Guido den Broeder 13:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support full trust. ––buecherwuermlein 13:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support without reservation. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Sadly the oversight-related work has increased in the past few months and a lot of log entries in meta need to be oversighted/suppresed (abusive names and the like). I think that DerHexer has enough experience as he has performed a lot of cross-wiki oversights/suppresions and thus, given that I think that meta needs more oversighters and I feel he is a perfect candidate, I support him. Thank you, — df| 13:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, trusted user. Alex Pereira falaê 13:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. →Nagy 14:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Absolutely. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Majorly talk 14:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, we definitely need more oversighters. I'd prefer a non-steward, but no reason DerHexer can't do it. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 15:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Of course. Definitely. Trusted. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pmlinediter (talk)
- Support, otherwise he'll flood #wikimedia-stewards ;) Laaknor 15:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Trusted and hard-working , happy to have your help --Mardetanha talk 16:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I do not know whether I am allowed or not, but I am going to vote :) --MacedonianBoy 17:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support duh. J.delanoygabsadds 18:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great user, will do fine with this tool. Cirt (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support trusted user --Jan eissfeldt 02:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Yes, of course! --M.L 12:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, trusted user. LeinaD (t) 18:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Tempodivalse [talk] 20:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Lukas9950 13:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Meisterkoch 22:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --SVL 22:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Harald Krichel 22:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support NW (Talk) 00:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 19:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support iAlex 19:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Stefan64 22:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Nick1915 - all you want 08:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Cbrown1023 talk 03:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --.snoopy. ✉ 07:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --FiliP ██ 20:26, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Sure. Trusted user who can certainly use this tool. --Erwin 21:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --თოგო (D) 11:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]