Meta:Requests for oversight/DerHexer

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

• Link for the candidate: DerHexer (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Dear community, I would like to suggest DerHexer as new oversighter in Meta-Wiki. As a steward, He performed great number of hiding revs/logs on multiple Wikimedia projects. There would be no objection that DerHexer is a hard-working contributor. I believe DerHexer would do good jobs, and oversightship on him would be helpful for maintenance. Kwj2772 (msg) 11:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about requesting oversight access on meta: several times to help out especially on Special:Log/globalauth (where are still several insulting and private informations publishing accounts visible) as long as bugzilla:18183 or bugzilla:18060 are not yet fixed; cf. SB. So if you want to me to do that it's fine, if you think meta: has enough local oversights it's fine, too. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1.  Support trusted hard working user. --Meno25 12:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2.  Support sure. Great user. It can't harm to have him with the tools. Barras || talk 12:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3.  Support as nom. Kwj2772 (msg) 12:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4.  Support Guido den Broeder 13:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
5.  Support full trust. ––buecherwuermlein 13:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
6.  Support without reservation. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
7.  Support - Sadly the oversight-related work has increased in the past few months and a lot of log entries in meta need to be oversighted/suppresed (abusive names and the like). I think that DerHexer has enough experience as he has performed a lot of cross-wiki oversights/suppresions and thus, given that I think that meta needs more oversighters and I feel he is a perfect candidate, I support him. Thank you, — df|  13:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
8.  Support, trusted user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 13:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
9.  Support. →Nagy 14:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
10. Support Absolutely. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
11.  Support Majorly talk 14:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
12. Yes, we definitely need more oversighters. I'd prefer a non-steward, but no reason DerHexer can't do it.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 15:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
13.  Support Of course. Definitely. Trusted. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pmlinediter (talk)
14.  Support, otherwise he'll flood #wikimedia-stewards ;) Laaknor 15:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
15.  Support Trusted and hard-working , happy to have your help --Mardetanha ^talk 16:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
16.  Support I do not know whether I am allowed or not, but I am going to vote :) --MacedonianBoy 17:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
17.  Support duh. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
18.  Support Great user, will do fine with this tool. Cirt (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
19.  Support trusted user --Jan eissfeldt 02:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
20.  Support Yes, of course! --M.L 12:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
21. Support, trusted user. LeinaD (t) 18:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
22. Support. Tempodivalse [talk] 20:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
23.  Support Lukas9950 13:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
24.  Support Meisterkoch 22:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
25.  Support --SVL 22:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
26.  Support --Harald Krichel 22:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
27.  Support NW (Talk) 00:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
28.  Support --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 19:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
29.  Support iAlex 19:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
30.  Support Stefan64 22:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
31.  Support--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 08:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
32.  Support Cbrown1023 talk 03:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
33.  Support --.snoopy. ✉ 07:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
34.  Support --FiliP ██ 20:26, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
35.  Support - Sure. Trusted user who can certainly use this tool. --Erwin 21:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
36.  Support --თოგო ^(D) 11:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]