Agabi10

Hallo Agabi10,

For merging items, you may want to use the merge.js gadget from help page about merging. It has an option "Request deletion for extra items on RfD" to automatically place a request to delete the emptied page. This way of nominating makes it a lot easier for the admins to process the requests.

With regards, -      - (Cycn/talk) 14:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

• There are not two Nisan Akmans. Please do not invent gender to people you do not know, and merge the two. I'm waiting to see. --212.174.190.24 14:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Most of the times when adding directors of films I usually use the IMDb ID to find them, so I didn't know it already existed an item for Nisan Akman (Q6067004), that's the reason I created Nisan Akman (Q117955518). About the gender thing it isn't fair telling that I invented it, I just inferred she was male based on the fact that the IMDb profile tells she is a director and an actor (instead of actress). You fixed the gender and I merged both items, so there shouldn't be a problem anymore. -- Agabi10 (talk) 03:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks. Danke schön. Merci. Grazie. Gracias. 212.174.190.24 15:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

His full name in Russian is "Феликс Санчез". So please do something to link this item with ru:Феликс (имя) (now at Феликс). --Infovarius (talk) 06:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Infovarius: I think I don't understand what you mean... The problem is that the correct name should be with Felix (Q18177136)? If it's that you can change the claim yourself, I only changed from the disambiguation page to the first name I found which has the same label in Spanish (there were more than one and the one you show me looks also valid for Spanish), if I chose it incorrectly feel free to correct the claim. -- Agabi10 (talk) 10:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok, it's very complicated. I've done something with Felix for a while. I have many hot discussion on that question, one of them is recently on my discussion page (only if you want to track the problem). One part of the problem is that disambiguation page which you've dislinked has Russian sitelink so it was partly correct. --Infovarius (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for your message. Those items was my first attempt to fulfil data using Wikidata:Wikisource/How to help#Works, months ago. I'll change those by João do Rio (Q1710229) according. Lugusto (talk) 18:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hi, I saw that you contributed to the Pokémon WikiProject. If you are interested to help again this project, please add the talk page in your Watchlist and add your username to the list of participants so that you can be easily pinged. Sorry for bothering you with this message and thank you very much to read this request! --★ → Airon 90 09:47, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear Agabi10,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at the King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized (?) to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me on kholoudsaa@gmail.com or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdmmFHaiB20nK14wrQJgfrA18PtmdagyeRib3xGtvzkdn3Lgw/viewform?usp=sf_link with your choice of the times that work for you. I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me using the email mentioned above if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoud

Hi, you made a mistake at Jason Zada (Q6163834), connecting it to a completely unrelated person on IMDb. I've corrected it to point to the right person. —capmo (talk) 03:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

@capmo: I don't even remember how that happened… I'm usually more careful than that, so I might have mixed tabs or something when copying it without realizing, because the numbers aren't even similar. Thanks for fixing it. -- Agabi10 (talk) 11:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

No problem, mistakes happen :) I'm going through this list of constraint violation errors and yours was in the middle, but they are mostly caused by bots. Thanks for your contributions! —capmo (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dear Agabi10,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender system that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our system based on your previous edits. Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study will start in late January 2022 or early February 2022, and it should take no more than 30 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about the study, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoudsaa (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I see you scraped and added content descriptors to ClassInd ratings. First of all, thank you, but could you do a round of checks and correct the cases where there were multiple ratings on the ClassInd website? As the example of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (Q232009) shows, you added the descriptors of the first rating and not the one present on the item. Thanks, Máté (talk) 06:11, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Máté I didn't realize there could be more than one, I'll update the script and check all of them again to fix the problems. Thanks for the warning. -- Agabi10 (talk) 08:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! :) Máté (talk) 09:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Done Máté after getting the list of IDs with more than one element there weren't that many, at least here, so I checked the list manually and fixed the ones where there was a problem. -- Agabi10 (talk) 12:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

On Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (Q232009) there was only one statement when you added the wrong descriptors. I added the second statement afterwards. The check needs to be done from the other side (for which films there are multiple ratings in the ClassInd database, not in Wikidata). – Máté (talk) 13:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Máté the check I've done is getting the whole list of entities that have ClassInd rating (P3216) and ClassInd audiovisual work ID (P8958) with SPARQL and then I looped through all the values of ClassInd audiovisual work ID (P8958) in the ClassInd database. If one of those had more than one entry in the list of the ClassInd database I added the entity id and the URL of the ClassInd page to the output of the script and then I checked all of those. The ones I didn't manually check are the ones that had 0 or 1 entry in the ClassInd database, because I assumed that if those have only one value there I couldn't import the wrong one. I think I understand correctly the problem, but if not just let me know ;-) -- Agabi10 (talk) 21:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

You're awesome, thanks! – Máté (talk) 04:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear Agabi10,

I hope you are doing well,

We are a group of researchers from King’s College London working on developing WQT (Wikidata Quality Toolkit), which will support a diverse set of editors in curating and validating Wikidata content.

We are inviting you to participate in an online workshop aimed at understanding the requirements for designing effective and easy-to-use user interfaces (UI) for three tools within WQT that can support the daily activities of Wikidata editors: recommending items to edit based on their personal preferences, finding items that need better references, and generating entity schemas automatically for better item quality.

The main activity during this workshop will be UI mockup sketching. To facilitate this, we encourage you to attend the workshop using a tablet or laptop with PowerPoint installed or any other drawing tools you prefer. This will allow for a more interactive and productive session as we delve into the UI mockup sketching activities.

Participation is completely voluntary. You should only take part if you want to and choosing not to take part will not disadvantage you in any way. However, your cooperation will be valuable for the WQT design. Please note that all data and responses collected during the workshop will be used solely for the purpose of improving the WQT and understanding editor requirements. We will analyze the results in an anonymized form, ensuring your privacy is protected. Personal information will be kept confidential and will be deleted once it has served its purpose in this research.

The online workshop, which will be held on April 5th, should take no more than 3 hours.

If you agree to participate in this workshop, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form to register your interest https://forms.office.com/e/9mrE8rXZVg Then, I will contact you with all the instructions for the workshop.

For more information about my project, please read this page: https://king-s-knowledge-graph-lab.github.io/WikidataQualityToolkit/

If you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me at the email address mentioned above.

Thank you for considering taking part in this project.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 03:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Agabi10, te escribo aquí porque me bloquearon en la Wikipedia en español.

Se corrigió el error para algunas películas, como dos de las que mencioné: Black Hawk Down y Todos los hombres del presidente.

Gracias por el trabajo.

Sin embargo, el error no se ha corregido para otras películas, como A Mighty Heart.

La categoría de "Películas basadas en novelas" tiene casi 3.000 películas, y parece que bastantes de ellas siguen estando ahí por algún otro error de categorización automática que permanece.

Saludos y gracias. Buenovale (talk) 17:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply