Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions

1. D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from a first order electroweak phase transition: a brief review, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Land. A 376 (2018) 20170126 [arXiv:1705.01783] [INSPIRE].

   MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

2. C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 163001 [arXiv:1801.04268] [INSPIRE].

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

3. A. Mazumdar and G. White, Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures, Rept. Frog. Phys. 82 (2019) 076901 [arXiv:1811.01948] [INSPIRE].

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

4. E. Senaha, Symmetry restoration and breaking at finite temperature: an introductory review, Symmetry 12 (2020) 733 [INSPIRE].

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 04 (2016) 001 [arXiv:1512.06239] [INSPIRE]

   Google Scholar 

6. C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [arXiv:1910.13125] [INSPIRE].

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Electroweak baryogenesis, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 125003 [arXiv:1206.2942] [INSPIRE].

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. G. A. White, A pedagogical introduction to electroweak baryogenesis, IOP, Bristol, U.K. (2016) [INSPIRE].

   Book  Google Scholar 

9. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, The electroweak phase transition: a nonperturbative analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 466 (1996) 189 [hep-lat/9510020] [INSPIRE].

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Is there a hot electroweak phase transition at m_H larger or equal to m_W?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2887 [hep-ph/9605288] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, A nonperturbative analysis of the finite T phase transition in SU(2) × U(1) electroweak theory, Nucl. Phys. B 493 (1997) 413 [hep-lat/9612006] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. F. Csikor, Z. Fodor and J. Heitger, Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 21 [hep-ph/9809291] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

13. M. D’Onofrio and K. Rummukainen, Standard model cross-over on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 025003 [arXiv:1508.07161] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. G. Gil, P. Chankowski and M. Krawczyk, Inert dark matter and strong electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 396 [arXiv:1207.0084] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. M. Carena, G. Nardini, M. Quirós and C. E. M. Wagner, MSSM electroweak baryogenesis and LHC data, JHEP 02 (2013) 001 [arXiv:1207.6330] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, C. L. Wainwright and P. Winslow, Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035018 [arXiv:1407.5342] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. J. Kozaczuk, S. Profumo, L. S. Haskins and C. L. Wainwright, Cosmological phase transitions and their properties in the NMSSM, JHEP 01 (2015) 144 [arXiv:1407.4134] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. V. Vaskonen, Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves from a real scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 123515 [arXiv:1611.02073] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

19. G. C. Dorsch, S. J. Huber, T. Konstandin and J. M. No, A second Higgs doublet in the early universe: baryogenesis and gravitational waves, JCAP 05 (2017) 052 [arXiv:1611.05874] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. C.-W. Chiang, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and E. Senaha, Standard model with a complex scalar singlet: cosmological implications and theoretical considerations, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015005 [arXiv:1707.09960] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. A. Beniwal, M. Lewicki, M. White and A. G. Williams, Gravitational waves and electroweak baryogenesis in a global study of the extended scalar singlet model, JHEP 02 (2019) 183 [arXiv:1810.02380] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. S. Bruggisser, B. Von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant, Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis in composite Higgs models, JHEP 12 (2018) 099 [arXiv:1804.07314] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. P. Athron, C. Balázs, A. Fowlie, G. Pozzo, G. White and Y. Zhang, Strong first-order phase transitions in the NMSSM — a comprehensive survey, JHEP 11 (2019) 151 [arXiv:1908.11847] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

24. K. Kainulainen, V. Keus, L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, T. V. I. Tenkanen and V. Vaskonen, On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the two Higgs doublet model, JHEP 06 (2019) 075 [arXiv:1904.01329] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. C. Grojean, G. Servant and J. D. Wells, First-order electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a low cutoff, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0407019] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. C. Delaunay, C. Grojean and J. D. Wells, Dynamics of non-renormalizable electroweak symmetry breaking, JHEP 04 (2008) 029 [arXiv:0711.2511] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. M. Chala, C. Krause and G. Nardini, Signals of the electroweak phase transition at colliders and gravitational wave observatories, JHEP 07 (2018) 062 [arXiv:1802.02168] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Stepping into electroweak symmetry breaking: phase transitions and Higgs phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035013 [arXiv:1212.5652] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and M. B. Wise, Color breaking in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015003 [arXiv:1303.1140] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. N. Blinov, J. Kozaczuk, D. E. Morrissey and C. Tamarit, Electroweak baryogenesis from exotic electroweak symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035012 [arXiv:1504.05195] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. S. ArunaSalam and A. Kobakhidze, Electroweak monopoles and the electroweak phase transition, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 444 [arXiv:1702.04068] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. I. Baldes, T. Konstandin and G. Servant, A first-order electroweak phase transition from varying Yukawas, Phys. Lett. B 786 (2018) 373 [arXiv:1604.04526] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. S. A. R. Ellis, S. Ipek and G. White, Electroweak baryogenesis from temperature-varying couplings, JHEP 08 (2019) 002 [arXiv:1905.11994] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

34. B. von Harling and G. Servant, QCD-induced electroweak phase transition, JHEP 01 (2018) 159 [arXiv:1711.11554] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

35. S. Ipek and T. M. P. Tait, Early cosmological period of QCD confinement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 112001 [arXiv:1811.00559] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. D. Croon, J. N. Howard, S. Ipek and T. M. P. Tait, QCD baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 055042 [arXiv:1911.01432] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

37. A. Angelescu and P. Huang, Multiste p strongly first order phase transitions from new fermions at the TeV scale, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055023 [arXiv:1812.08293] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. P. Schwaller, Gravitational waves from a dark phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 181101 [arXiv:1504.07263] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. D. Croon, V. Sanz and G. White, Model discrimination in gravitational wave spectra from dark phase transitions, JHEP 08 (2018) 203 [arXiv:1806.02332] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. D. Croon, T.E. Gonzalo and G. White, Gravitational waves from a Pati-Salam phase transition, JHEP 02 (2019) 083 [arXiv:1812.02747] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. E. Hall, T. Konstandin, R. McGehee, H. Murayama and G. Servant , Baryogenesis from a dark first-order phase transition, JHEP 04 (2020) 042 [arXiv:1910.08068] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

42. D. Croon, A. Kusenko, A. Mazumdar and G. White, Solitosynthesis and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 085010 [arXiv:1910.09562] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

43. D. Croon, R. Houtz and V. Sanz, Dynamical axions and gravitational waves, JHEP 07 (2019) 146 [arXiv:1904.10967] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

44. D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu, Testing electroweak baryogenesis with future colliders, JHEP 11 (2014) 127 [arXiv:1409.0005] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. A. V. Kotwal, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, J. M. No and P. Winslow, Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions in the 100 TeV frontier, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 035022 [arXiv:1605.06123] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, The electroweak phase transition: a collider target, JHEP 09 (2020) 179 [arXiv:1912.07189] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

47. K. Assamagan et al., The Higgs portal and cosmology, arXiv:1604.05324 [INSPIRE].

48. I. Baldes and C. Garcia-Cely, Strong gravitational radiation from a simple dark matter model, JHEP 05 (2019) 190 [arXiv:1809.01198] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

49. A. D. Linde, Infrared problem in thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills gas, Phys. Lett. B 96 (1980) 289 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry behavior at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3320 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde, Symmetry behavior in gauge theories, Annals Phys. 101 (1976) 195 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

52. R. R. Parwani, Resummation in a hot scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 4695 [Erratum ibid. 48 (1993) 5965] [hep-ph/9204216] [INSPIRE].

53. P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, The effective potential and first order phase transitions: beyond leading-order, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 3546 [Erratum ibid. 50 (1994) 6662] [ hep-ph/9212235] [INSPIRE].

54. J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen and M. Trott, Electroweak baryogenesis in two Higgs doublet models and B meson anomalies, JHEP 11 (2011) 089 [arXiv:1107.3559] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

55. M. Laine, M. Meyer and G. Nardini, Thermal phase transition with full 2-loop effective potential, Nucl. Phys. B 920 (2017) 565 [arXiv:1702.07479] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

56. D. Curtin, P. Meade and H. Ramani, Thermal resummation and phase transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 787 [arXiv:1612.00466] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

57. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Simple effective Lagrangian for hard thermal loops, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) R1827 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

58. P. H. Ginsparg, First order and second order phase transitions in gauge theories at finite temperature, Nu cl. Phys. B 170 (1980) 388 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

59. T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski, High-temperature Yang-Mills theories and three-dimensional quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2305 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

60. S. Nadkarni, Dimensional reduction in hot QCD, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 917 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

61. N. P. Landsman, Limitations to dimensional reduction at high temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 322 (1989) 498 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

62. K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, 3D physics and the electroweak phase transition: perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 425 (1994) 67 [hep-ph/9404201] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

63. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Effective field theory approach to high temperature thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 6990 [hep-ph/9501375] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

64. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Free energy of QCD at high temperature, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 3421 [hep-ph/9510408] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

65. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 458 (1996) 90 [hep-ph/9508379] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

66. K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, 3D physics and the electroweak phase transition: a framework for lattice Monte Carlo analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 442 (1995) 317 [hep-lat/9412091] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

67. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

68. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

69. P. H. Damgaard, A. Haarr, D. O’Connell and A. Tranberg, Effective field theory and electroweak baryogenesis in the singlet-extended standard model, JHEP 02 (2016) 107 [arXiv:1512.01963] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

70. J. de Vries, M. Postma, J. van de Vis and G. White, Electroweak baryogenesis and the standard model effective field theory, JHEP 01 (2018) 089 [arXiv:1710.04061] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

71. C. Balázs, G. White and J. Yue, Effective field theory, electric dipole moments and electroweak baryogenesis, JHEP 03 (2017) 030 [arXiv: 1612. 01270] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

72. J. De Vries, M. Postma and J. van de Vis, The role of leptons in electroweak baryogenesis, JHEP 04 (2019) 024 [arXiv:1811.11104] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

73. V. Q. Phong, P. H. Khiem, N. P. D. Loc and H. N. Long, Sphaleron in the first-order electroweak phase transition with the dimension-six Higgs field operator, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 116010 [arXiv:2003.09625] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

74. J. de Blas, M. Chala, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable effects of general new scalar particles, JHEP 04 (2015) 078 [arXiv:1412.8480] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

75. D. Marzocca et al., BSM benchmarks for effective field theories in Higgs and electroweak physics, arXiv:2009.01249 [INSPIRE].

76. D. Bödeker, L. Fromme, S. J. Huber and M. Seniuch, The baryon asymmetry in the standard model with a low cut-off, JHEP 02 (2005) 026 [hep-ph/0412366] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

77. R.-G. Cai, M. Sasaki and S.-J. Wang, The gravitational waves from the first-order phase transition with a dimension-six operator, JCAP 08 (2017) 004 [arXiv:1707.03001] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

78. S. J. Huber and T. Konstandin, Production of gravitational waves in the NMSSM, JCAP 05 (2008) 017 [arXiv:0709.2091] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

79. H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Baryon washout, electroweak phase transition, and perturbation theory, JHEP 07 (2011) 029 [arXiv:1101.4665] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

80. C. Wainwright, S. Profumo and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Gravity waves from a cosmological phase transition: gauge artifacts and daisy resummations, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 023521 [arXiv:1104.5487] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

81. C. L. Wainwright, S. Profumo and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf , Phase transitions and gauge artifacts in an Abelian Higgs plus singlet model, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083537 [arXiv:1204.5464] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

82. C.-W. Chiang and E. Senaha, On gauge dependence of gravitational waves from a first-order phase transition in classical scale-invariant U(1)′ models, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 489 [arXiv:1707.06765] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

83. B. Jain, S. J. Lee and M. Son, Validity of the effective potential and the precision of Higgs field self-couplings, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075002 [arXiv:1709.03232] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

84. C.-W. Chiang, Y.-T. Li and E. Senaha, Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 154 [arXiv:1808.01098] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

85. T. Prokopec, J. Rezacek and B. Świezewska, Gravitational waves from conformal symmetry breaking, JCAP 02 (2019) 009 [arXiv:1809.11129] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

86. O. Gould, J. Kozaczuk, L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir, Nonperturbative analysis of the gravitational waves from a first-order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115024 [arXiv:1903.11604] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

87. M. Carena, Z. Liu and Y. Wang, Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z₂-breaking, JHEP 08 (2020) 107 [arXiv:1911.10206] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

88. J. M. Cline and K. Kainulainen, Supersymmetric electroweak phase transition: dimensional reduction versus effective potential, Nucl. Phys. B 510 (1998) 88 [hep-ph/9705201] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

89. I. Affieck, Quantum statistical metastability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 (1981) 388 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

90. A. D. Linde, Decay of the false vacuum at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 216 (1983) 421 [Erratum ibid. 223 (1983) 544] [INSPIRE].

91. J. S. Langer, Theory of the condensation point, Annals Phys. 41 (1967) 108 [Annals Phys. 281 (2000) 941] [INSPIRE].

92. J. S. Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Annals Phys. 54 (1969) 258 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

93. K. Enqvist, J. Ignatius, K. Kajantie and K. Rummukainen, Nucleation and bubble growth in a first order cosmological electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 3415 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

94. R. Jinno, S. Lee, H. Seong and M. Takimoto, Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions: towards model separation by bubble nucleation rate, JCAP 11 (2017) 050 [arXiv:1708.01253] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

95. M. Hindmarsh and M. Hijazi, Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions in the sound shell model, JCAP 12 (2019) 062 [arXiv:1909.10040] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

96. J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No and G. Servant, Energy budget of cosmological first-order phase transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028 [arXiv:1004.4187] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

97. M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D. J. Weir, Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 103520 [Erratum ibid. 101 (2020) 089902] [arXiv:1704.05871] [INSPIRE].

98. F. Giese, T. Konstandin and J. van de Vis, Model-independent energy budget of cosmological first-order phase transitions — a sound argument to go beyond the bag model, JCAP 07 (2020) 057 [arXiv:2004.06995] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

99. T. Brauner, T. V. I. Tenkanen, A. Tranberg, A. Vuorinen and D. J. Weir, Dimensional reduction of the standard model coupled to a new singlet scalar field, JHEP 03 (2017) 007 [arXiv:1609.06230] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

100. Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].

101. F. Karsch, A. Patkos and P. Petreczky, Screened perturbation theory, Phys. Lett. B 401 (1997) 69 [hep-ph/9702376] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

102. J. O. Andersen and L. Kyllingstad, Four-loop screened perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 076008 [arXiv:0805.4478] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

103. P. M. Stevenson, Optimized perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2916 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

104. E. J. Weinberg and A.-Q. Wu, Understanding complex perturbative effective potentials, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2474 [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

105. A. Masoumi, K. D. Olum and B. Shlaer, Efficient numerical solution to vacuum decay with many fields, JCAP 01 (2017) 051 [arXiv:1610.06594] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

106. P. Athron, C. Balázs, M. Bardsley, A. Fowlie, D. Harries and G. White, BubbleProfiler: finding the field profile and action for cosmological phase transitions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244 (2019) 448 [arXiv:1901.03714] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

107. L. P. Csernai and J. I. Kapusta, Nucleation of relativistic first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 1379 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

108. M. E. Carrington and J. I. Kapusta, Dynamics of the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 5304 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

109. I. Ghişoiu, J. Möller and Y. Schröder, Debye screening mass of hot Yang-Mills theory to three-loop order, JHEP 11 (2015) 121 [arXiv:1509.08727] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

110. M. Laine, P. Schicho and Y. Schroder, Soft thermal contributions to 3-loop gauge coupling, JHEP 05 (2018) 037 [arXiv:1803.08689] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

111. M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, Basics of thermal field theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 925 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1701.01554] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

112. J. Ghiglieri, A. Kurkela, M. Strickland and A. Vuorinen, Perturbative thermal QCD: formalism and applications, Phys. Rept. 880 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2002.10188] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

113. A. Gynther and M. Vepsäläinen, Pressure of the standard model at high temperatures, JHEP 01 (2006) 060 [hep-ph/0510375] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

114. A. Gynther and M. Vepsiiliiinen, Pressure of the standard model near the electroweak phase transition, JHEP 03 (2006) 011 [hep-ph/0512177] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

115. M. Losada, High temperature dimensional reduction of the MSSM and other multiscalar models, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2893 [hep-ph/9605266] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

116. M. Losada, The two loop finite temperature effective potential of the MSSM and baryogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B 537 (1999) 3 [hep-ph/9806519] [INSPIRE].

117. M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, The MSSM electroweak phase transition on the lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 535 (1998) 423 [hep-lat/9804019] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

118. M. Laine, G. Nardini and K. Rummukainen, Lattice study of an electroweak phase transition at m_h ~ 126 GeV, JCAP 01 (2013) 011 [arXiv:1211.7344] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

119. J. O. Andersen, Dimensional reduction of the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature, Eur. Phys. J. C 11 (1999) 563 [hep-ph/9804280] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

120. L. Niemi, H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir, Electroweak phase transition in the real triplet extension of the SM: dimensional reduction, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035002 [arXiv:1802.10500] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

121. L. Niemi, M. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir, Thermodynamics of a two-step electroweak phase transition, arXiv:2005.11332 [INSPIRE].

122. J. O. Andersen et al., Nonperturbative analysis of the electroweak phase transition in the two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 191802 [arXiv:1711.09849] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

123. T. Gorda, A. Helset, L. Niemi, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir, Three-dimensional effective theories for the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature, JHEP 02 (2019) 081 [arXiv:1802.05056] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

124. A. D. Linde, Fate of the false vacuum at finite temperature: theory and applications, Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981) 37 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

125. J. Garriga, Instantons for vacuum decay at finite temperature in the thin wall limit, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 5497 [hep-th/9401020] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

126. M. Laine, Exact relation of lattice and continuum parameters in three-dimensional SU(2) + Higgs theories, Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995) 484 [hep-lat/9504001] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

127. M. Laine and A. Rajantie, Lattice continuum relations for 3D SU(N) + Higgs theories, Nucl. Phys. B 513 (1998) 471 [hep-lat/9705003] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

128. C.-X. Zhai and B. M. Kastening, The free energy of hot gauge theories with fermions through g⁵, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 7232 [hep-ph/9507380] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

129. M. Laine, P. Schicho and Y. Schröder, A QCD Debye mass in a broad temperature range, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 023532 [arXiv:1911.09123] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

130. M. Laine, The two loop effective potential of the 3D SU(2) Higgs model in a general covariant gauge, Phys. Lett. B 335 (1994) 173 [hep-ph/9406268] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

131. J. Kripfganz, A. Laser and M. G. Schmidt, The high temperature two loop effective potential of the electroweak theory in a general ‘t Hooft background gauge, Phys. Lett. B 351 (1995) 266 [hep-ph/9501317] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

132. E. J. Weinberg, Vacuum decay in theories with symmetry breaking by radiative corrections, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 4614 [hep-ph/9211314] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

133. W. Buchmüller, Z. Fodor, T. Helbig and D. Walliser, The weak electroweak phase transition, Annals Phys. 234 (1994) 260 [hep-ph/9303251] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

134. M. Karjalainen and J. Peisa, Dimensionally reduced U(1) + Higgs theory in the broken phase, Z. Phys. C 76 (1997) 319 [hep-lat/9607023] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

135. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, 3D SU(N) + adjoint Higgs theory and finite temperature QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 503 (1997) 357 [hep-ph/9704416] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

136. G. D. Moore and K. Rummukainen, Electroweak bubble nucleation, nonperturbatively, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 045002 [hep-ph/0009132] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

137. M. Garny and T. Konstandin, On the gauge dependence of vacuum transitions at finite temperature, JHEP 07 (2012) 189 [arXiv:1205.3392] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

138. M. Laine, Gauge dependence of the high temperature two loop effective potential for the Higgs field, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4525 [ hep-ph/9411252] [INSPIRE].

139. J. R. Espinosa, M. Garny and T. Konstandin, Interplay of infrared divergences and gauge-dependence of the effective potential, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055026 [arXiv:1607.08432] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

140. N. K. Nielsen, On the gauge dependence of spontaneous symmetry breaking in gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 101 (1975) 173 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

141. R. Fukuda and T. Kugo, Gauge invariance in the effective action and potential, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 3469 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

142. S. R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 1. Semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 [Erratum ibid. 16 (1977) 1248] [INSPIRE].

143. A. Andreassen, D. Farhi, W. Frost and M. D. Schwartz, Direct approach to quantum tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 231601 [arXiv:1602.01102] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

144. J. R. Espinosa, A fresh look at the calculation of tunneling actions, JCAP 07 (2018) 036 [arXiv:1805.03680] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

145. J. R. Espinosa and T. Konstandin, A fresh look at the calculation of tunneling actions in multi-field potentials, JCAP 01 (2019) 051 [arXiv:1811.09185] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

146. C. L. Wainwright, CosmoTransitions: computing cosmological phase transition temperatures and bubble profiles with multiple fields, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2006 [arXiv:1109.4189] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

147. C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 2. First quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1762 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

148. J. Baacke and G. Lavrelashvili, One loop corrections to the metastable vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 025009 [hep-th/0307202] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

149. G. V. Dunne and H. Min, Beyond the thin-wall approximation: precise numerical computation of prefactors in false vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 125004 [hep-th/0511156] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

150. H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie and G. White, Phase transitions in an expanding universe: stochastic gravitational waves in standard and non-standard histories, JCAP 01 (2021) 001 [arXiv:2007.08537] [INSPIRE].

     MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

151. J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, J. M. No and V. Vaskonen, Gravitational wave energy budget in strongly supercooled phase transitions, JCAP 06 (2019) 024 [arXiv:1903.09642] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

152. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared singularities and massive fields, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2856 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

153. M. Laine and M. Losada, Two loop dimensional reduction and effective potential without temperature expansions, Nucl. Phys. B 582 (2000) 277 [hep-ph/0003111] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

154. J. P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and A. Rebhan, On the apparent convergence of perturbative QCD at high temperature, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 025011 [hep-ph/0303045] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

155. M. Laine and Y. Schröder, Quark mass thresholds in QCD thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 085009 [hep-ph/0603048] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

156. M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, Higgs sector CP-violation at the electroweak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 545 (1999) 141 [hep-ph/9811369] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

157. M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, Two Higgs doublet dynamics at the electroweak phase transition: a nonperturbative study, Nucl. Phys. B 597 (2001) 23 [hep-lat/0009025] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

158. J. Langer, Metastable states, Physica 73 (1974) 61.

     Article  Google Scholar 

159. W. Buchmüller, T. Helbig and D. Walliser, First order phase transitions in scalar electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 407 (1993) 387 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

160. M. Gleiser, G. C. Marques and R. O. Ramos, On the evaluation of thermal corrections to false vacuum decay rates, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 1571 [hep-ph/9304234] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

161. M. G. Alford and J. March-Russell, Radiatively induced first order phase transitions: the necessity of the renormalization group, Nucl. Phys. B 417 (1994) 527 [hep-ph/9308364] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

162. D. Bödeker, W. Buchmiiller, Z. Fodor and T. Helbig, Aspects of the cosmological electroweak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 423 (1994) 171 [hep-ph/9311346] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

163. J. Berges, N. Tetradis and C. Wetterich, Coarse graining and first order phase transitions, Phys. Lett. B 393 (1997) 387 [hep-ph/9610354] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

164. A. Surig, Selfconsistent treatment of bubble nucleation at the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5049 [hep-ph/9706259] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

165. A. Strumia and N. Tetradis, A consistent calculation of bubble nucleation rates, Nucl. Phys. B 542 (1999) 719 [hep-ph/9806453] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

166. B. Garbrecht and P. Millington, Self-consistent solitons for vacuum decay in radiatively generated potentials, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 125022 [arXiv:1509.08480] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

167. A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M. D. Schwartz, Scale invariant instantons and the complete lifetime of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 056006 [arXiv:1707.08124] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

168. G. D. Moore, K. Rummukainen and A. Tranberg, Nonperturbative computation of the bubble nucleation rate in the cubic anisotropy model, JHEP 04 (2001) 017 [hep-lat/0103036] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

169. D. Croon, E. Hall and H. Muruyama, Non-perturbative methods for false vacuum decay, to appear.

170. D. Metaxas and E. J. Weinberg, Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 836 [hep-ph/9507381] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

171. D. Metaxas, Derivative expansion and gauge independence of the false vacuum decay rate in various gauges, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 085009 [hep-ph/0011015] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

172. A. D. Plascencia and C. Tamarit , Convexity, gauge-dependence and tunneling rates, JHEP 10 (2016) 099 [arXiv:1510.07613] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

173. J. S. Langer and L. A. Turski, Hydrodynamic model of the condensation of a vapor near its critical point, Phys. Rev. A 8 (1973) 3230.

     Article  Google Scholar 

174. M. E. Shaposhnikov, On nonperturbative effects at the high temperature electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 112 [hep-ph/9306296] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

175. K. Kajantie and M. Shaposhnikov, 3D physics and the electroweak phase transition: perturbation theory and lattice Monte Carlo analysis, in 1^st International Conference on Strong and Electroweak Matter, (1994), pg. 1.

176. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators I: formalism and λ dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

177. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

178. R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

179. P. B. Arnold, Phase transition temperatures at next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2628 [hep-ph/9204228] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

180. A. Andreassen, Gauge dependence of the quantum field theory effective potential, master’s thesis, Norwegian U. Sci. Tech., Trondheim, Norway (2013).

181. A. J. Andreassen, Precision tunneling rate calculations in quantum field theory and the ultimate fate of our universe, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A. (2018).

182. M. Sher, Electroweak Higgs potentials and vacuum stability, Phys. Rept. 179 (1989) 273 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

183. P. Schicho, Multi-loop investigations of strong interactions at high temperatures, Ph.D. thesis, U. Bern, Bern, Switzerland (2020).

184. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — a complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

185. M. Vepsäläinen, Applications of dimensional reduction to electroweak and QCD matter, Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki U., Helsinki, Finland (2007) [arXiv:0709.2773] [INSPIRE].

186. P. Nogueira, Automatic Feynman graph generation, J. Comput. Phys. 105 (1993) 279.

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

187. B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren, FORM version 4.2, arXiv:1707.06453 [INSPIRE].

188. M. Nishimura and Y. Schröder, IBP methods at finite temperature, JHEP 09 (2012) 051 [arXiv:1207.4042] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

189. S. Laporta, High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

190. P. B. Arnold and C.-X. Zhai, The three loop free energy for high temperature QED and QCD with fermions, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1906 [hep-ph/9410360] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

191. A. Ekstedt and J. Löfgren, The high-temperature expansion of the thermal sunset, arXiv:2006.02179 [INSPIRE].

192. J. Österman, Evaluation of master integrals in thermal field theory, master’s thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (2019).

193. I. Ghisoiu and Y. Schröder, A new method for taming tensor sum-integrals, JHEP 11 (2012) 010 [arXiv:1208.0284] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

194. P. B. Arnold and C.-X. Zhai, The three loop free energy for pure gauge QCD, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7603 [hep-ph/9408276] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

195. J. O. Andersen, E. Braaten and M. Strickland, The massive thermal basketball diagram, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 045004 [hep-ph/0002048] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

196. A. Vuorinen, The pressure of QCD at finite temperatures and chemical potentials, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 054017 [hep-ph/0305183] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

197. A. Gynther, M. Laine, Y. Schröder, C. Torrero and A. Vuorinen, Four-loop pressure of massless O(N) scalar field theory, JHEP 04 (2007) 094 [hep-ph/0703307] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

198. J. O. Andersen, L. Kyllingstad and L. E. Leganger, Pressure to order g⁸ log g of massless ϕ⁴ theory at weak coupling, JHEP 08 (2009) 066 [arXiv:0903.4596] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

199. Y. Schröder, A fresh look on three-loop sum-integrals, JHEP 08 (2012) 095 [arXiv:1207.5666] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

200. J. Möller and Y. Schröder, Three-loop matching coefficients for hot QCD: reduction and gauge independence, JHEP 08 (2012) 025 [arXiv:1207.1309] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

201. I. Ghisoiu and Y. Schröder, A new three-loop sum-integral of mass dimension two, JHEP 09 (2012) 016 [arXiv:1207.6214] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

202. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phenomena, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. 113 (2002) 1.

     Google Scholar 

203. B. S. DeWitt, The global approach to quantum field theory. Volume 1, 2, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. 114 (2003) 1.

204. P. B. Arnold and L. D. McLerran, Sphalerons, small fluctuations and baryon number violation in electroweak theory, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 581 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

205. A. Berera, J. Mabillard, B. W. Mintz and R. O. Ramos, Formulating the Kramers problem in field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 076005 [arXiv:1906.08684] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

206. P. B. Arnold, D. Son and L. G. Yaffe, The hot baryon violation rate is \( O\left({\alpha}_W^5{T}^4\right) \), Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6264 [hep-ph/9609481] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

207. D. Bödeker, On the effective dynamics of soft non-Abelian gauge fields at finite temperature, Phys. Lett. B 426 (1998) 351 [hep-ph/9801430] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

208. K. Kawasaki, Growth rate of critical nuclei near the critical point of a fluid, J. Statist. Phys. 12 (1975) 365.

     Article  Google Scholar 

209. J. Baacke and V. G. Kiselev, One loop corrections to the bubble nucleation rate at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 5648 [hep-ph/9308273] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

210. D. E. Brahm and C. L. Y. Lee, The exact critical bubble free energy and the effectiveness of effective potential approximations, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4094 [hep-ph/9311353] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

211. L. Carson, X. Li, L. D. McLerran and R.-T. Wang, Exact computation of the small fluctuation determinant around a sphaleron, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2127 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

212. J. Baacke and S. Junker, Quantum fluctuations around the electroweak sphaleron, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2055 [hep-ph/9308310] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

213. J. Baacke and S. Junker, Quantum fluctuations of the electroweak sphaleron: erratum and addendum, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 4227 [hep-th/9402078] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

214. S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and Y. Shoji, State-of-the-art calculation of the decay rate of electroweak vacuum in the standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 211801 [arXiv:1707.09301] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

215. J. Kripfganz, A. Laser and M. G. Schmidt, Critical bubbles and fluctuations at the electroweak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 467 [hep-ph/9405225] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

216. A. I. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov, V. A. Novikov and M. A. Shifman, ABC’s of instantons, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25 (1982) 195 [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 136 (1982) 553] [INSPIRE].

217. G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi and A. Strumia, On the metastability of the standard model vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B 609 (2001) 387 [hep-ph/0104016] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

218. N. J. Günther, D. A. Nicole and D. J. Wallace, Goldstone modes in vacuum decay and first order phase transitions, J. Phys. A 13 (1980) 1755 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

219. J. Garriga, Nucleation rates in fiat and curved space, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6327 [hep-ph/9308280] [INSPIRE].

     Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

220. G. Münster and S. Rotsch, Analytical calculation of the nucleation rate for first order phase transitions beyond the thin wall approximation, Eur. Phys. J. C 12 (2000) 161 [cond-mat/9908246] [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

221. W. Buchmüller and T. Helbig, On the kinetics of the electroweak phase transition, in 15^th International Warsaw Meeting on Elementary Particle Physics: quest for links to new physics, (1992), pg. 341.

222. M. E. Shaposhnikov, Baryon asymmetry of the universe in standard electroweak theory, Nucl. Phys. B 287 (1987) 757 [INSPIRE].

     Article  Google Scholar 

Download references