Pig/swine welfare by Richard D Kirkden
Pre-weaning mortality varies greatly among herds and this is partly attributed to differences in ... more Pre-weaning mortality varies greatly among herds and this is partly attributed to differences in farrowing house management. In this review, we describe the various management strategies than can be adopted to decrease mortality and critically examine the evidence that exists to support their use. First, we consider which management procedures are effective against specific causes of death: intrapartum stillbirth, hypothermia, starvation, disease, crushing and savaging. The most effective techniques include: intervention to assist dystocic sows; measures to prevent and treat sow hypogalactia; good farrowing house hygiene; providing newborn piglets with a warm microenvironment; early fostering of supernumerary piglets; methods that assist small and weak piglets to breathe and obtain colostrum; and intervention to prevent deaths from crushing and savaging. The provision of nest-building material and modifications to the pen to assist the sow when lying down may also be beneficial, but the evidence is less clear. Because most deaths occur around the time of farrowing and during the first few days of life, the periparturient period is a particularly important time for management interventions intended to reduce piglet mortality. A number of procedures require a stockperson to be present during and immediately after farrowing. Secondly, we consider the benefits of farrowing supervision for pre-weaning mortality in general, focusing particularly on methods for the treatment of dystocia and programs of piglet care that combine multiple procedures. Thirdly, we discuss the need for good stockmanship if farrowing supervision is to be effective. Stockmanship refers not only to technical skills, but also to the manner in which sows are handled because this influences their fearfulness of humans. We conclude that piglet survival can be improved by a range of management procedures, many of which occur in the perinatal period and require the supervision of farrowing by trained staff. Although this incurs additional labor costs, there is some evidence that this can be economically offset by improved piglet survival.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Papers by Richard D Kirkden
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science Jaaws, Jun 28, 2012
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Http Dx Doi Org 10 1080 10888705 2011 575739, Jun 17, 2011
Understanding how nonhuman animals such as swine respond to their environment and understanding h... more Understanding how nonhuman animals such as swine respond to their environment and understanding how to provide them with a good quality of life involves using a range of experimental approaches. More and more, ethological researchers are turning to operant methods to answer some of these questions. Employing an operant such as a lever, researchers can assess how hard animals will work to get access to environmental resources: increased space or social contact. It is difficult, however, to determine how the effort made by the animals relates to the degree to which they need the resource and, in particular, how to interpret intermediate levels of responding. One approach to understanding the level of need is to compare it with familiar states of deprivation such as hunger. Food is an environmental resource known to range from low to high value depending on deprivation level. Depriving animals of a fixed proportion of their daily ad libitum intake allows the animals to demonstrate the levels of responding produced at satiation: 23 hr deprivation and a range of intermediate points. The resulting scale has both empirical and intuitive value and can help in understanding the value of various degrees of operant effort. Ultimately, this information will help in deciding which environmental conditions should be provided to swine as part of routine husbandry.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Laboratory Animals, 2005
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2011
Understanding how nonhuman animals such as swine respond to their environment and understanding h... more Understanding how nonhuman animals such as swine respond to their environment and understanding how to provide them with a good quality of life involves using a range of experimental approaches. More and more, ethological researchers are turning to operant methods to answer some of these questions. Employing an operant such as a lever, researchers can assess how hard animals will work to get access to environmental resources: increased space or social contact. It is difficult, however, to determine how the effort made by the animals relates to the degree to which they need the resource and, in particular, how to interpret intermediate levels of responding. One approach to understanding the level of need is to compare it with familiar states of deprivation such as hunger. Food is an environmental resource known to range from low to high value depending on deprivation level. Depriving animals of a fixed proportion of their daily ad libitum intake allows the animals to demonstrate the levels of responding produced at satiation: 23 hr deprivation and a range of intermediate points. The resulting scale has both empirical and intuitive value and can help in understanding the value of various degrees of operant effort. Ultimately, this information will help in deciding which environmental conditions should be provided to swine as part of routine husbandry.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2012
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2012
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2006
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2010
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2009
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2011
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2012
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Animal Behaviour, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
ABSTRACT High concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), used for killing laboratory rodents, are kn... more ABSTRACT High concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), used for killing laboratory rodents, are known to be more strongly aversive to rats than sweet food items are attractive. This study investigated whether the maintenance of a high oxygen (O2) concentration, using a gas mixture of 70% CO2 and 30% O2, would reduce aversion to CO2 during a gradual-fill procedure. Eight male Wistar rats, aged 10 months, were housed individually in an apparatus consisting of two cages, one higher than the other and joined by a tube. In a series of trials, subjects entered the lower cage for a reward of 20 sweet food items. The gas was turned on at the moment the rat started eating the reward items and flowed into the lower cage at a fixed rate. There were four treatments: 1) 100% CO2 at 14.5% cage volume min–1; 2) gas mixture at 14.5% min–1; 3) gas mixture at 21.0% min–1, which delivered CO2 at approximately 14.5% min–1 and 4) air, with each subject tested with each treatment four times. Measures of willingness to stay and eat in the lower cage (latency to stop eating, latency to leave and the number of reward items eaten) were much lower in all three gas treatments than in air, indicating that the CO2 and the CO2 + O2 mixture were both more strongly aversive than sweet food items were attractive. Comparing the gas mixture with 100% CO2, the latency to leave and the number of reward items eaten were slightly higher in the CO2 + O2 mixture at 21% min–1 than in CO2 at 14.5% min–1, indicating that the addition of O2 slightly reduced the aversiveness of CO2 in the gradual-fill procedure. This reduction is not enough to warrant recommending the use of CO2 + O2 mixtures for killing rats.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Pig/swine welfare by Richard D Kirkden
Papers by Richard D Kirkden