[From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft “Law on Culture]"> [From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft “Law on Culture]">
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rua/wpaper/apru175ye20143.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

От Теории К Практике Экономического Регулирования: Десять Тезисов К Проекту Закона О Культуре
[From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft “Law on Culture]

Author

Listed:
  • Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич
Abstract
В статье предложена концепция экономического регулирования в сфере культуры, представляющая комбинацию четырех основных институтов: институт дифференцированных бюджетных нормативов, характеризующий минимальную долю расходов на культуру в бюджетах всех уровней, обеспечивающих выполнение государственных обязательств перед потребителями культурных благ и работниками культуры; институт индивидуальных бюджетных назначений («процентная филантропия»), обеспечивающий непосредственное участие граждан в распределении бюджетных средств, выборе направлений расходования небольшой части налоговых доходов государства; институт маркированных налогов, предусматривающий прямое направление в сферу культуры доходов от конкретных видов налогов и сборов; институт эндаумент-фондов, позволяющий накапливать поступления от маркированных налогов и индивидуальных бюджетных назначений с целью извлечения возрастающего текущего дохода от целевого капитала, направляемого на поддержку культурной деятельности в форме конкурсного финансирования грантов. Предложенную систему экономического регулирования культурной деятельности можно рассматривать в качестве модельной для всех видов опекаемых благ. С определенной адаптацией к конкретным условиям функционирования науки, образования и здравоохранения она может стать основой для соответствующих институциональных реформ. Тhe paper proposes the concept of economic regulation in the sphere of culture, representing combination of four main institutions: institution of differentiated budget performance standards, that characterize the minimum share ofspending on culture in the budgets of all levelsthat enforce to ensure compliance with state obligations to consumers of cultural goods and cultural workers; institution of individual budget allocations (“percentage philanthropy”), which provides a direct participation of citizens in budget allocation, choosing areas of spending of a small part of the state income tax; institution of marked taxes, providing a direct referral into the cultural sphere of revenues from specific taxes and fees; institute of endowment funds, allowing to accumulate revenues from marked taxes and individual budget allocations, in order to derive an increasing current income from the endowment going to support cultural activities in the form of competitive grant funding. The proposed system of economic regulation of cultural activities can be seen as a model for all kinds of patronized goods. With a certain adaptation to the specific conditions of the functioning of science, education and health care, it can be the basis for appropriate institutional reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "От Теории К Практике Экономического Регулирования: Десять Тезисов К Проекту Закона О Культуре [From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft “Law on Culture]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2014:3, Institute of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:rua:wpaper:a:pru175:ye:2014:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.econorus.org/pdf/NEA-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Музычук, 2012. "Должно Ли Государство Финансировать Культуру? (Научный Доклад) [Should the state finance culture?]," Working papers a:pmu374:1, Institute of Economics.
    2. Rubinshtein, A., 2010. "Instead of a Conclusion," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 6, pages 163-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Экономический Кризис И Новая Парадигма Общественной Поддержки Опекаемых Благ [Economic Crisis and the New Paradigm of Public Support of the Patronized Goods]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2015:2, Institute of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Вступительная Заметка [Introductory Note]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2014:4, Institute of Economics.
    2. Rubinshtein, A., 2014. "From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft "Law on Culture"," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 24(4), pages 210-217.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    culture; patronized goods; budget performance standards; tax protectionism; institution of individual budget allocations; “percentage philanthropy”; marked taxes; endowment funds;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • P35 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Public Finance
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rua:wpaper:a:pru175:ye:2014:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.