Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00678895.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are Islamic Indexes more Volatile than Conventional Indexes? Evidence from Dow Jones Indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Amélie Charles

    (Audencia Recherche - Audencia Business School)

  • Olivier Darné

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Adrian Pop

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract
We examine whether global or local events are important drivers in causing major shifts and excessive volatility in Islamic indexes than in conventional indexes. We apply an iterative cumulative sum of squares (ICSS) algorithm to identify structural breaks in the volatility of several major Dow Jones Islamic and conventional indexes over the period 1996-2009. The results show that both indexes have been affected by variance changes. The null hypothesis of equality of variance between both indexes is not rejected for the majority of sub-periods defined from ICSS. When the null hypothesis is rejected, the Islamic indexes exhibit slightly highest volatilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Amélie Charles & Olivier Darné & Adrian Pop, 2012. "Are Islamic Indexes more Volatile than Conventional Indexes? Evidence from Dow Jones Indexes," Working Papers hal-00678895, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00678895
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00678895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00678895/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shumi Akhtar & Maria Jahromi & Tom Smith, 2017. "Risk, return and mean-variance efficiency of Islamic and non-Islamic stocks: evidence from a unique Malaysian data set," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 3-46, March.
    2. Achraf Ghorbel & Mouna Abdelhedi & Younes Boujelbene, 2014. "Assessing the Impact of Crude Oil Price and Investor Sentiment on Islamic Indices: Subprime Crisis," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 13-24, April.
    3. Majdoub, Jihed & Mansour, Walid & Jouini, Jamel, 2016. "Market integration between conventional and Islamic stock prices," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 436-457.
    4. Safika Praveen Sheikh & Shafkat Shafi Dar & Sajad Ahmad Rather, 2020. "Volatility Contagion and Portfolio Diversification among Shariah and Conventional Indices: An Evidence by MGARCH Models عدوى التقلبات و تنوع التصورات في أحكام الشريعة الإسلامية والأحكام التقليدية: إثب," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 33(1), pages 35-55, January.
    5. Audi, Marc & Sadiq, Azhar & Ali, Amjad, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of Islamic and Non-Islamic Equity and Bonds Indices: Evidence from selected Emerging and Developed Countries," MPRA Paper 109866, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00678895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.