Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/pennfi/15-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dealer Inventory Behavior: An Empirical Investigation of NASDAQ Stocks

Author

Listed:
  • Hans R. Stoll
Abstract
Important elements in almost every financial market are the dealers who stand ready to trade for their own accounts and thereby provide to the public the convenience of being able to trade immediately. Today the structure of securities markets is in the process of major change; and as part of this restructuring, a major issue is the way in which dealer services ought to be provided and what the appropriate balance between regulation and competition ought to be. In this paper the quality of dealer services in the over-the-counter (OTC) market as reflected in the nature and degree of dealer inventory changes is examined using NASDAQ (National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation) system data on closing prices and dealer purchases and sales for each stock for each of six trading days between July 9, 1973 (Monday) and July 16, 1973. Appendix I contains a detailed discussion of the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans R. Stoll, "undated". "Dealer Inventory Behavior: An Empirical Investigation of NASDAQ Stocks," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 15-74, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:pennfi:15-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frino, Alex & Forrest, Peter & Duffy, Matthew, 1999. "Life in the pits: competitive market making and inventory control--further Australian evidence," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(3-4), pages 373-385, November.
    2. Bruno Biais, 1990. "Formation des prix sur les marchés de contrepartie. Une synthèse de la littérature récente," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 41(5), pages 755-788.
    3. Wu, Chunchi, 2004. "Information flow, volatility and spreads of infrequently traded Nasdaq stocks," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 20-43, February.
    4. James C. Van Horne & Hal B. Heaton, 1983. "Securities Inventories And Excess Returns," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 93-102, June.
    5. Shafiqur Rahman & Chandrasekhar Krishnamurti & Alice Lee, 2005. "The Dynamics of Security Trades, Quote Revisions, and Market Depths for Actively Traded Stocks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 91-124, September.
    6. Joseph J. Schultz Jr. & Sandra G. Gustavson & Frank K. Reilly, 1985. "Factors Influencing The New York Stock Exchange Specialists' Price-Setting Behavior: An Experiment," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 8(2), pages 137-144, June.
    7. Venkateswar, Sankaran, 1992. "Replacement cost disclosures, information asymmetry and market-maker behaviour: Assessment through the bid-ask spread," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 139-155.
    8. Frino, Alex & Jarnecic, Elvis, 2000. "An empirical analysis of the supply of liquidity by locals in futures markets: Evidence from the Sydney Futures Exchange," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(3-4), pages 443-456, July.
    9. Gray, Stephen F. & Smith, Tom & Whaley, Robert E., 2003. "Stock splits: implications for investor trading costs," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 271-303, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:pennfi:15-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rwupaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.