(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)"> (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)">
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/norgee/05-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strategic Buyers and the Social Cost of Monopoly

Author

Listed:
  • Ellingsen, T.
Abstract
Competition for a monopoly position with known profitability is often analyzed as a rent-seeking game, in which the potential producers spend resources in order to obtain the monopoly. Because of such expenditures, the social cost of monopoly is commonly argued to equal the sum of “Harberger costs” (i.e., the deadweight loss) and “Tullock costs” (the expected sum of expenditures on rent seeking).1 Recently, several writers have recognized that buyers do not always passively accept monopoly pricing. On the contrary, buyers often engage in costly rent-defending activities, such as persuading authorities to regulate the price and quality 2 of the monopolized good. This occurs not only when the product is an intermediary good sold to a few industrial buyers, but also when consumer organizations engage in legal proceedings and political lobbying on behalf of otherwise disparate and uncoordinated buyers.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ellingsen, T., 1990. "Strategic Buyers and the Social Cost of Monopoly," Papers 05-90, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration-.
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:norgee:05-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:norgee:05-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nhhhhno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.