(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstrac
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)"> (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstrac
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)">
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bie/wpaper/337.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Egalitarianism in convex fuzzy games

Author

Listed:
  • Brânzei, Rodica

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

  • Dimitrov, Dinko

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

  • Tijs, Stef

    (Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University)

Abstract
In this paper the egalitarian solution for convex cooperative fuzzy games is introduced.The classical Dutta-Ray algorithm for finding the constrained egalitarian solution for convex crisp games is adjusted to provide the egalitarian solution of a convex fuzzy game.This adjusted algorithm is also a finite algorithm, because the convexity of a fuzzy game implies in each step the existence of a maximal element which corresponds to a crisp coalition.For arbitrary fuzzy games the equal division core is introduced.It turns out that both the equal division core and the egalitariansolution of a convex fuzzy game coincide with the corresponding equal division core and the constrained egalitarian solution, respectively, of the related crisp game.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
(This abstrac
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Brânzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2017. "Egalitarianism in convex fuzzy games," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 337, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    • Handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2911424/2911425
    File Function: First Version, 2002
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dutta, Bhaskar & Ray, Debraj, 1989. "A Concept of Egalitarianism under Participation Constraints," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 615-635, May.
    2. Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Tijs, S.H., 2002. "Convex Fuzzy Games and Participation Monotonic Allocation Schemes," Discussion Paper 2002-13, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Tsurumi, Masayo & Tanino, Tetsuzo & Inuiguchi, Masahiro, 2001. "A Shapley function on a class of cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 596-618, March.
    4. Jens Leth Hougaard & Lars Thorlund-Petersen & Bezalel Peleg, 2001. "On the set of Lorenz-maximal imputations in the core of a balanced game," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 30(2), pages 147-165.
    5. Branzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2004. "Hypercubes and compromise values for cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 733-740, June.
    6. Anindya Bhattacharya, 2004. "On the equal division core," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 22(2), pages 391-399, April.
    7. Dutta, B, 1990. "The Egalitarian Solution and Reduced Game Properties in Convex Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 19(2), pages 153-169.
    8. Toru Hokari, 2000. "Population monotonic solutions on convex games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 29(3), pages 327-338.
    9. Branzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2003. "On convex fuzzy games," Other publications TiSEM b53ebd70-807d-46cf-a854-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Klijn, Flip & Slikker, Marco & Tijs, Stef & Zarzuelo, Jose, 2000. "The egalitarian solution for convex games: some characterizations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 111-121, July.
    11. Javier Arin & Elena Inarra, 2001. "Egalitarian solutions in the core," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 30(2), pages 187-193.
    12. Jean-Pierre Aubin, 1981. "Cooperative Fuzzy Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stef Tijs & Rodica Brânzei, 2004. "Various characterizations of convex fuzzy games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(2), pages 399-408, December.
    2. Branzei, R. & Tijs, S. & Zarzuelo, J., 2009. "Convex multi-choice games: Characterizations and monotonic allocation schemes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 571-575, October.
    3. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2017. "Fuzzy games: a complement-consistent solution, axiomatizations and dynamic approaches," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 257-268, September.
    4. Carles Rafels & Cori Vilella, 2005. "Proportional Share Analysis," Working Papers 218, Barcelona School of Economics.
    5. Carles Rafels & Cori Vilella, 2007. "Proportional share analysis," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(2), pages 341-354, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brânzei, R. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "Egalitarianism in Multi-Choice Games," Discussion Paper 2007-55, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Francesc Llerena & Carles Rafels & Cori Vilella, 2008. "A simple procedure for computing strong constrained egalitarian allocations," Working Papers 327, Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Brânzei, R. & Llorca, N. & Sánchez-Soriano, J. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "Egalitarianism in Multi-Choice Games," Other publications TiSEM bfbd67a5-701f-4be7-a1c9-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Dietzenbacher, Bas & Yanovskaya, Elena, 2020. "Antiduality in exact partition games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 116-121.
    5. Dietzenbacher, Bas & Dogan, Emre, 2024. "Population monotonicity and egalitarianism," Research Memorandum 007, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    6. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2019. "The Procedural Egalitarian Solution and Egalitarian Stable Games," Other publications TiSEM 6caea8c0-1dcd-4038-88da-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Llerena, Francesc & Mauri, Llúcia, 2017. "On the existence of the Dutta–Ray’s egalitarian solution," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 92-99.
    8. Calleja, Pedro & Llerena, Francesc & Sudhölter, Peter, 2021. "Axiomatizations of Dutta-Ray’s egalitarian solution on the domain of convex games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Bas Dietzenbacher & Elena Yanovskaya, 2021. "Consistency of the equal split-off set," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Takafumi Otsuka, 2020. "Egalitarian solution for games with discrete side payment," Papers 2003.10059, arXiv.org.
    11. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2010. "Monotonicity of social welfare optima," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 392-402, November.
    12. Takanashi, Seiji, 2024. "Analysis of the core under inequality-averse utility functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 52-60.
    13. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2020. "Monotonicity and Egalitarianism (revision of CentER DP 2019-007)," Other publications TiSEM 295f156e-91ad-4177-b61a-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Dietzenbacher, Bas, 2021. "Monotonicity and egalitarianism," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 194-205.
    15. Llerena Garrés, Francesc & Mauri Masdeu, Llúcia, 2016. "On the existence of the Dutta-Ray’s egalitarian solution," Working Papers 2072/266573, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    16. Dietzenbacher, Bas & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2017. "The procedural egalitarian solution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-187.
    17. Francesc Llerena & Cori Vilella, 2013. "An axiomatic characterization of the strong constrained egalitarian solution," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1438-1445.
    18. Francesc Llerena & Llúcia Mauri, 2016. "Reduced games and egalitarian solutions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 45(4), pages 1053-1069, November.
    19. Francesc Llerena & Llúcia Mauri, 2015. "On the Lorenz-maximal allocations in the imputation set," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2475-2481.
    20. Vincent Iehlé, 2015. "The lattice structure of the S-Lorenz core," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 141-151, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bie:wpaper:337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bettina Weingarten (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imbiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.