Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anp/en2003/f01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Uma Avaliação da Política de Combate à Informalidade da Mão-de-Obra, Aplicando Teoria dos Jogos

Author

Listed:
  • Admilson Moreira dos Santos

    (UNB)

Abstract
The policy to combat informal labour, implemented by Labour Inspectorate Units (Fiscalização do Trabalho) until December 2002, did not result in a reduction in the informal sector indicators provided by IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Statistics and Research) for the Brazilian labour market. This raises a question: why has the work carried out by Labour Inspectorate Units did not result in a reduction in the informal sector figures if the number of workers formally registered during inspections significantly increased in the period from 1999 to 2002? The present study is based on the assumption that there were flaws in the model and procedures followed by Labour Inspectorate Units to combat informality in the labour market, which counteracted the positive outcome that the increase in formality resulting from inspection activities should have generated in the labour market.

Suggested Citation

  • Admilson Moreira dos Santos, 2003. "Uma Avaliação da Política de Combate à Informalidade da Mão-de-Obra, Aplicando Teoria dos Jogos," Anais do XXXI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Economics Meeting] f01, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    • Handle: RePEc:anp:en2003:f01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anpec.org.br/encontro2003/artigos/F01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Combating Informality; Labour Inspection Procedures; Fine Charging Effectiveness;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J58 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anp:en2003:f01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rodrigo Zadra Armond (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/anpecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.