Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-137-34500-4_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Abstract Hypotheses and Historical Hypotheses and on Value Judgements in Economic Science

In: Luigi Einaudi: selected Economic Essays, Volume 2

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Faucci

    (University of Pisa)

  • Roberto Marchionatti

    (University of Turin)

Abstract
The author studies the differences between abstract hypotheses and uniformities and empirical-historical uniformities in the field of economic science, distinguishing those that are valid sub specie aeternitatis but within the limits of the premises that have been established, from those which cannot be extended, except with great caution, beyond the time and place considered. Do the models of the different types of state proposed by economists for the study of financial affairs belong to the category of abstract or historical tools of investigation? The concept of a state which, in pursuit of its own ends, focuses only on the individual or only the collective community, is logically incoherent. And finally, the economist’s decision to refrain from value judgements, which is legitimate if motivated by the scientific division of labour, but illogical from the perspective of the more general quest for truth.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Faucci & Roberto Marchionatti, 2014. "Abstract Hypotheses and Historical Hypotheses and on Value Judgements in Economic Science," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Riccardo Faucci & Roberto Marchionatti (ed.), Luigi Einaudi: selected Economic Essays, Volume 2, chapter 1, pages 21-66, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-34500-4_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137345004_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Silvestri, 2016. "Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries: Philosophy, Economics and Value Judgments," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 24(3), pages 187-221.
    2. Silvestri, Paolo, 2015. "Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments," CESMEP Working Papers 201504, University of Turin.
    3. Christ Kevin, 2018. "A Measure of Judgments – Wilhelm Röpke’s Methodological Heresy," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 35-50, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-34500-4_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.