Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/lum/prchap/11-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Stakeholder Capitalism: Progressive Dream or Nightmare?

In: 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS)

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Rosefielde

    (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA)

Abstract
Joseph Stiglitz’s proposes transforming America’s “liberal capitalism†into “progressive capitalism†by encouraging socially responsible corporations to include progressive stakeholders in corporate decision-making. He suggests that the time may be ripe because the Business Roundtable recently endorsed efforts to make American corporations more socially responsible. He predicts that if the Business Roundtable is sincere, progressive socially responsible, stakeholder and shareholder joint sovereign corporations will create a more dynamic economy, with greater shared prosperity and uplift the majority again to a middle-class life. However, Stiglitz fails to probe the contradictions and moral hazards inherent in stakeholder-shareholder co-sovereignty that could transform his dream into a nightmare. This essay elaborates and critically evaluates Stiglitz’s concept in the contemporary American political context. It shows that while progressive capitalism founded on stakeholder-shareholder co-sovereignty could have merit, corporations should reject it until Stiglitz explains how corporate boards of directors can safely test the waters.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Rosefielde, 2020. "Stakeholder Capitalism: Progressive Dream or Nightmare?," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 3, pages 14-23, Editura Lumen.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:11-03
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gekos2020/03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/245/243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings/article/view/245
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/gekos2020/03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pareto, Vilfredo, 2014. "Manual of Political Economy: A Critical and Variorum Edition," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199607952 edited by Montesano, Aldo & Zanni, Alberto & Bruni, Luigino & Chipman, John S. & McLure, Michael.
    2. L. Randall Wray, 2024. "Modern Money Theory," Springer Books, Springer, edition 3, number 978-3-031-47884-0, June.
    3. Abram Bergson, 1954. "On the Concept of Social Welfare," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 68(2), pages 233-252.
    4. Bergson, Abram, 1976. "Social choice and welfare economics under representative government," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 171-190, October.
    5. Oskar Lange, 1936. "On the Economic Theory of Socialism," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 53-71.
    6. Stiglitz, J.E., 2016. "An agenda for sustainable and inclusive growth for emerging markets," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 693-710.
    7. McGaughey, Ewan, 2016. "The codetermination bargains: the history of German corporate and labour law," LawArXiv 3pyku, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosefielde, Steven, 2004. "An abnormal country," BOFIT Discussion Papers 15/2004, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    2. repec:zbw:bofitp:2004_015 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rosefielde, Steven, 2004. "An abnormal country," BOFIT Discussion Papers 15/2004, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    4. Herrade Igersheim, 2019. "The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy," Post-Print hal-02517017, HAL.
    5. Jael, Paul, 2015. "Socialist Calculation and Market Socialism," MPRA Paper 64255, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2021. "A Mathematical Model of MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) with Profit Return," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(4), pages 39-55, December.
    7. Thomas Palley, 2018. "Government Spending and the Income-Expenditure Model: The Multiplier, Spending Composition, and Job Guarantee Programs," FMM Working Paper 30-2018, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    8. Josh Ryan-Collins, 2015. "Is Monetary Financing Inflationary? A Case Study of the Canadian Economy, 1935-75," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_848, Levy Economics Institute.
    9. Kujtim Avdiu & Stephan Unger, 2022. "Predicting Inflation—A Holistic Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, March.
    10. He, Yong, 2018. "Can the visible and invisible hands coexist in land pricing?," MPRA Paper 88770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tian, Guoqiang, 2004. "On the Informational Requirements of Decentralized Pareto-Satisfactory Mechanisms in Economies with Increasing Returns," MPRA Paper 41226, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2006.
    12. Brett Fiebiger & Scott Fullwiler & Stephanie Kelton & L. Randall Wray, 2012. "Modern Monetary Theory: A Debate," Working Papers wp279, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    13. Peter Zweifel & H. E. Frech, 2016. "Why ‘Optimal’ Payment for Healthcare Providers Can Never be Optimal Under Community Rating," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 9-20, February.
    14. Àlex Arenas & Antonio Cabrales & Leon Danon & Albert Díaz-Guilera & Roger Guimerà & Fernando Vega-Redondo, 2010. "Optimal information transmission in organizations: search and congestion," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 75-93, March.
    15. Yasuhito Tanaka, 2021. "An Elementary Mathematical Model for MMT (Modern Monetary Theory)," Research in Applied Economics, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Marc Fleurbaey & Philippe Mongin, 2005. "The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggerated," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 25(2), pages 381-418, December.
    17. Etienne Farvaque & Alexander Mihailov & Alireza Naghavi, 2018. "The Grand Experiment of Communism: Discovering the Trade-Off between Equality and Efficiency," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(4), pages 707-742, December.
    18. Jörg Bibow, 2013. "Lost at Sea: The Euro Needs a Euro Treasury," IMK Studies 35-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    19. Richard S.J. Tol & Peter Dolton, 2016. "A survey of the UK population on public policy," Working Paper Series 8416, Department of Economics, University of Sussex.
    20. G. Olanrewaju & S. Tella & B. Adesoye, 2019. "Institutional Quality, Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Growth: Causality Evidence from Nigeria," Economic and Financial Review, Central Bank of Nigeria, vol. 57(3), September.
    21. Massimo Cingolani, 2015. "Sylos Labini su Marx: implicazioni per la politica economica (Sylos Labini on Marx: economic policy implications)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 68(269), pages 81-147.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Joseph Stiglitz; liberal capitalism; progressive capitalism; socially responsible corporations; progressive stakeholders; stakeholder and shareholder joint sovereignty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business
    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:prchap:11-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://proceedings.lumenpublishing.com/ojs/index.php/lumenproceedings .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.