Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hpe/journl/y2014v208i1p11-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilización y tiempos de espera: dos vertientes inseparables del análisis de la equidad en el acceso al sistema sanitario público

Author

Listed:
  • Ignacio Abásolo

    (Universidad de La Laguna)

  • Miguel Negrín

    (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria)

  • Jaime Pinilla

    (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria)

Abstract
El objetivo de esta investigación consiste en analizar si existe equidad en el acceso a los servicios sanitarios públicos por niveles socioeconómicos. Se analiza conjuntamente la probabilidad de utilizar los servicios sanitarios y los tiempos de espera hasta ser atendidos, corrigiéndose así el sesgo de selección que se derivaría de su estudio separado, tal y como se evidencia en esta investigación. Se propone una aproximación bayesiana y se hace uso de la información a nivel individual sobre la utilización sanitaria, tiempos de espera, nivel socioeconómico, necesidad sanitaria y otras variables sociodemográficas contenidas en la En-cuesta nacional de salud (2006). Los resultados muestran que hay inequidad en el acceso a los servicios especializados y hospitalarios (tanto en utilización como en tiempos de espera) que perjudica a los niveles socioeconómicos inferiores. En los servicios de medicina general, si bien la utilización beneficia relativa-mente más a los grupos de menor nivel socioeconómico, los tiempos de espera perjudican a los de menor nivel educativo.

Suggested Citation

  • Ignacio Abásolo & Miguel Negrín & Jaime Pinilla, 2014. "Utilización y tiempos de espera: dos vertientes inseparables del análisis de la equidad en el acceso al sistema sanitario público," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 208(1), pages 11-38, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2014:v:208:i:1:p:11-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ief.es/comun/Descarga.cshtml?ruta=~/docs/destacados/publicaciones/revistas/hpe/208_Art1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Puhani, 2000. "The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 53-68, February.
    2. James J. Heckman, 1976. "The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 5, number 4, pages 475-492, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Ignacio Abásolo & Miguel Negrín-Hernández & Jaime Pinilla, 2014. "Equity in specialist waiting times by socioeconomic groups: evidence from Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(3), pages 323-334, April.
    4. Partha Deb & Murat K. Munkin & Pravin K. Trivedi, 2006. "Bayesian analysis of the two‐part model with endogeneity: application to health care expenditure," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(7), pages 1081-1099, November.
    5. repec:bla:revinw:v:43:y:1997:i:3:p:319-33 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ding, Peng, 2014. "Bayesian robust inference of sample selection using selection-t models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 451-464.
    7. Silvio R. Rendon, 2013. "Fixed and Random Effects in Classical and Bayesian Regression," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 75(3), pages 460-476, June.
    8. Crespo-Cebada, Eva & Urbanos-Garrido, Rosa M., 2012. "Equity and equality in the use of GP services for elderly people: The Spanish case," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 193-199.
    9. Tom Van Ourti, 2004. "Measuring horizontal inequity in Belgian health care using a Gaussian random effects two part count data model," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(7), pages 705-724, July.
    10. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    11. Philip Heidelberger & Peter D. Welch, 1983. "Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1109-1144, December.
    12. Eddy van Doorslaer & Xander Koolman & Andrew M. Jones, 2004. "Explaining income‐related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(7), pages 629-647, July.
    13. Francis Vella, 1998. "Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 33(1), pages 127-169.
    14. Klaas de Vos & M. Asghar Zaidi, 1997. "Equivalence Scale Sensitivity Of Poverty Statistics For The Member States Of The European Community," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 43(3), pages 319-333, September.
    15. Guillem Lopez‐Casasnovas & Joan Costa‐Font & Ivan Planas, 2005. "Diversity and regional inequalities in the Spanish ‘system of health care services’," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(S1), pages 221-235, September.
    16. van Hasselt, Martijn, 2011. "Bayesian inference in a sample selection model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 221-232.
    17. Arnesen, Kjell E. & Erikssen, Jan & Stavem, Knut, 2002. "Gender and socioeconomic status as determinants of waiting time for inpatient surgery in a system with implicit queue management," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 329-341, December.
    18. Ignacio Abasolo & Rob Manning & Andrew Jones, 2001. "Equity in utilization of and access to public-sector GPs in Spain," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 349-364.
    19. Morris, Stephen & Sutton, Matthew & Gravelle, Hugh, 2005. "Inequity and inequality in the use of health care in England: an empirical investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 1251-1266, March.
    20. Laura Vallejo‐Torres & Stephen Morris, 2013. "Income‐Related Inequity In Healthcare Utilisation Among Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease In England—Accounting For Vertical Inequity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 533-553, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Cantarero-Prieto & Marta Pascual-Sáez & Javier Lera Torres, 2018. "Socioeconomic determinants and health care utilization among elderly people living in Europe: Evidence from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 1801, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel O. Ogundimu & Jane L. Hutton, 2016. "A Sample Selection Model with Skew-normal Distribution," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 172-190, March.
    2. Wiemann, Paul F.V. & Klein, Nadja & Kneib, Thomas, 2022. "Correcting for sample selection bias in Bayesian distributional regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Watanabe, Hajime & Maruyama, Takuya, 2024. "A Bayesian sample selection model with a binary outcome for handling residential self-selection in individual car ownership," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Arndt Reichert & Harald Tauchmann, 2014. "When outcome heterogeneously matters for selection: a generalized selection correction estimator," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 762-768, March.
    5. Li, Phillip, 2011. "Estimation of sample selection models with two selection mechanisms," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1099-1108, February.
    6. Marjan Petreski & Nikica Blazevski & Blagica Petreski, 2014. "Gender Wage Gap when Women are Highly Inactive: Evidence from Repeated Imputations with Macedonian Data," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 393-411, December.
    7. Kossova, Elena & Potanin, Bogdan, 2018. "Heckman method and switching regression model multivariate generalization," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 50, pages 114-143.
    8. Kyung‐Rae Hyun & Sungwook Kang & Sunmi Lee, 2016. "Population Aging and Healthcare Expenditure in Korea," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(10), pages 1239-1251, October.
    9. Wojtyś, Małgorzata & Marra, Giampiero & Radice, Rosalba, 2018. "Copula based generalized additive models for location, scale and shape with non-random sample selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Eunji Choi & Jonghoon Park & Seongwoo Lee, 2020. "The Effect of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Program on Farm Income in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Seonho Shin, 2022. "To work or not? Wages or subsidies?: Copula-based evidence of subsidized refugees’ negative selection into employment," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 2209-2252, October.
    12. Villarreal, Francisco G., 2014. "Financial Services and Household Inequality in Mexico," MPRA Paper 57075, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Marra, Giampiero & Radice, Rosalba, 2013. "Estimation of a regression spline sample selection model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 158-173.
    14. Bhat, Chandra R. & Eluru, Naveen, 2009. "A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 749-765, August.
    15. Zhao, Jun & Kim, Hea-Jung & Kim, Hyoung-Moon, 2020. "New EM-type algorithms for the Heckman selection model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Eric French & Elaine Kelly & Richard Cookson & Carol Propper & Miqdad Asaria & Rosalind Raine, 2016. "Socio‐Economic Inequalities in Health Care in England," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 37, pages 371-403, September.
    17. Myck, Michal & Nici?ska, Anna & Morawski, Leszek, 2009. "Count Your Hours: Returns to Education in Poland," IZA Discussion Papers 4332, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Takashi Yamagata & Chris Orme, 2005. "On Testing Sample Selection Bias Under the Multicollinearity Problem," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 467-481.
    19. Ibáñez, Ana María & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Verwimp, Philip, 2013. "Abandoning Coffee under the Threat of Violence and the Presence of Illicit Crops. Evidence from Colombia," Documentos CEDE Series 161356, Universidad de Los Andes, Economics Department.
    20. Zhang, Rong & Inder, Brett A. & Zhang, Xibin, 2015. "Bayesian estimation of a discrete response model with double rules of sample selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 81-96.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Equidad en acceso; utilización de servicios sanitarios; tiempos de espera; sesgo de selección; modelos bayesianos;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • D39 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2014:v:208:i:1:p:11-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Miguel Gómez de Antonio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iefgves.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.