Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmerit/v2y2022i3p13-186d881669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employers’ Perceived Career Impact of Canada’s Parental-Leave Extension from 35 to 61 Weeks—“An Empty Gift”

Author

Listed:
  • Rachael N. Pettigrew

    (Department of General Management and Human Resources, Bissett School of Business, Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada)

Abstract
Introduced in 1990, Canadian parental-leave policy has seen several iterations. The most recent policy change, introduced in December 2017, extended parental leave from 35 to 61 weeks, resulting in longer work interruptions. Forty-six structured interviews were conducted to explore Canadian employers’ perception of how use of the new extended leave may impact employees’ careers. Though some employers offered explicit support for employees, a large proportion of employers felt that use of the longer leave would negatively impact employees’ careers. The presence of unions appeared to insulate employees from a career impact. A thematic analysis revealed that the career impact perceived by employers resulted from concern for employees’ missed opportunities (e.g., training, promotions), length of absence, specific employment situations (e.g., role, level in the organization, career ambitions, and tenure with the organization), and gendered views of employee leave use. Given that the vast majority of Canadian parental-leave users continue to be women, this research highlights the presence of considerable workplace stigma for work interruptions and that longer parental leave may only serve to exacerbate that stigma, especially for women. Recommendations and implications for parental-leave policy, workers, and employers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachael N. Pettigrew, 2022. "Employers’ Perceived Career Impact of Canada’s Parental-Leave Extension from 35 to 61 Weeks—“An Empty Gift”," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:13-186:d:881669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/2/3/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/2/3/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beauregard, T. Alexandra & Henry, Lesley C., 2009. "Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 25224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Kati Kuitto & Janne Salonen & Jan Helmdag, 2019. "Gender Inequalities in Early Career Trajectories and Parental Leaves: Evidence from a Nordic Welfare State," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Margaret W. Sallee, 2013. "Gender Norms and Institutional Culture: The Family-Friendly versus the Father-Friendly University," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(3), pages 363-396, May.
    4. Lisa Vaagan Moen & Elin Kvande & Kine Nordli, 2019. "Father’s Use of Parental Leave in Organizations with Different Institutional Logics," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wünderlich, Nancy V. & Iseke, Anja & Becker-Özcamlica, Hürrem, 2020. "Branded Employee Behaviour as a Double-Edged Sword: How Perceptions of Service Employees Impact Job Seekers' Application Intentions," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 4(4), pages 205-215.
    2. Mohsin, Asad & Lengler, Jorge & Aguzzoli, Roberta, 2015. "Staff turnover in hotels: Exploring the quadratic and linear relationships," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 35-48.
    3. Zuzana Lušňáková & Silvia Lenčéšová & Veronika Hrdá & Mária Šajbidorová, 2020. "Innovative Processes Within Communication and Motivation, Work Environment Care and Creativity Support of Human Resources," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 395-405.
    4. Masood Badri & Mugheer Al Khaili & Guang Yang & Muna Al Bahar & Asma Al Rashdi, 2022. "Examining the Structural Effect of Working Time on Well-Being: Evidence from Abu Dhabi," International Journal of Social Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 11(2), pages 24-44, September.
    5. Dr. Najia Shaikh & Prof. Dr. Javed Ahmed Chandio, 2024. "Work-Life Balance Policies and Organizational Outcomes: A Qualitative Investigation," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 475-481.
    6. Tanja van der Lippe & Laura den Dulk & Katia Begall, 2024. "Flextime/Flexspace for All in the Organization? A Study of the Availability, Use, and Consequences of Flexible Work Arrangements for Low and High SES Employees in Nine European Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Nida Denson & Katalin Szelényi & Kate Bresonis, 2018. "Correlates of Work-Life Balance for Faculty Across Racial/Ethnic Groups," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(2), pages 226-247, March.
    8. James Gerard Caillier, 2017. "Do Work-Life Benefits Enhance the Work Attitudes of Employees? Findings from a Panel Study," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 393-408, September.
    9. Lina Vyas & Francis Cheung & Hang-Yue Ngo & Kee-Lee Chou, 2022. "Family-Friendly Policies: Extrapolating A Pathway towards Better Work Attitudes and Work Behaviors in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Anja Feierabend & Philippe Mahler & Bruno Staffelbach, 2011. "Are there Spillover Effects of a Family Supportive Work Environment on Employees without Childcare Responsibilities?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 22(2), pages 188-209.
    11. Monteiro, Natália P. & Straume, Odd Rune & Valente, Marieta, 2021. "When does remote electronic access (not) boost productivity? Longitudinal evidence from Portugal," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Ibrahim Halil Seyrek & Ayhan Turan, 2017. "Effects of Individual Characteristics and Work Related Factors on the Turnover Intention of Accounting Professionals," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 236-244, January.
    13. Adame-Sánchez, Consolación & González-Cruz, Tomás F. & Martínez-Fuentes, Clara, 2016. "Do firms implement work–life balance policies to benefit their workers or themselves?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5519-5523.
    14. Tania Hasan & Mehwish Jawaad & Irfan Butt, 2021. "The Influence of Person–Job Fit, Work–Life Balance, and Work Conditions on Organizational Commitment: Investigating the Mediation of Job Satisfaction in the Private Sector of the Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Niklas Mäkinen & Jussi Tanskanen & Satu Ojala & Pasi Pyöriä, 2023. "Part-Time Workers’ Employment Trajectories by Length of Hours and Reason for Working Part-Time: An 8-Year Follow-Up Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    16. Maria-Lavinia FLOREA & Anca BORZA, 2017. "Practical Aspects Of Work-Life Balance: Segmentation-Integration Organizational Policies In Services Companies In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 928-942, November.
    17. Yutaka Ueda, 2012. "The Relationship between Work-life Balance Programs and Employee Satisfaction: Gender Differences in the Moderating Effect of Annual Income," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 65-74, April.
    18. Maria João Guedes & Maria Eduarda Soares & Pilar Mosquera & João Borregana, 2023. "Does it pay off to offer family-friendly practices? Exploring the missing links to performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 667-690, June.
    19. Sara Ashencaen Crabtree & Chris Shiel, 2019. "“Playing Mother†: Channeled Careers and the Construction of Gender in Academia," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    20. Natália P. Monteiro & Odd Rune Straume & Marieta Valente, 2019. "Does Remote Work Improve or Impair Firm Labour Productivity? Longitudinal Evidence from Portugal," CESifo Working Paper Series 7991, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:13-186:d:881669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.