1 dimensional sub-problems which are each within the decision maker's limited computing range. Based on the time length of the planning horizon and the nature of expectations, the resulting framework in which both forecasts and plans may get revised in the light of new information encompasses at the limits the benchmark infinite horizon case with perfect foresight, a rolling infinite horizon case, a self-fulfilling static planning case and Day's, 1969 two-period heuristic case. Under exogenous price and quantity growth forecasts consistent with the perfect foresight steady-state balanced growth path, the time length of the planning horizon may have no effect on the resulting competitive equilibrium which may deviate dramatically from the optimal solution. When these growth forecasts are endogenous, the competitive equilibrium effects of the planning horizon time length depend on the characteristics of the information sets. The resulting model may help us to better understand how economies respond to shocks by unraveling new propagation mechanisms related to changes in optimism or pessimism about short-run and/or long-run growth prospects."> 1 dimensional sub-problems which are each within the decision maker's limited computing range. Based on the time length of the planning horizon and the nature of expectations, the resulting framework in which both forecasts and plans may get revised in the light of new information encompasses at the limits the benchmark infinite horizon case with perfect foresight, a rolling infinite horizon case, a self-fulfilling static planning case and Day's, 1969 two-period heuristic case. Under exogenous price and quantity growth forecasts consistent with the perfect foresight steady-state balanced growth path, the time length of the planning horizon may have no effect on the resulting competitive equilibrium which may deviate dramatically from the optimal solution. When these growth forecasts are endogenous, the competitive equilibrium effects of the planning horizon time length depend on the characteristics of the information sets. The resulting model may help us to better understand how economies respond to shocks by unraveling new propagation mechanisms related to changes in optimism or pessimism about short-run and/or long-run growth prospects.">
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v215y2023icp268-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible time horizon planning, learning and aggregate fluctuations

Author

Listed:
  • Cellarier, L.L.
Abstract
A dynamic general equilibrium model is constructed and analyzed under the assumptions that the representative decision maker is endowed with incomplete knowledge about his environment of interest along with limited cognitive skills. Under various beliefs about the long-run growth prospects consistent with Kaldor's, 1961 stylized facts, the benchmark infinite-dimensional decentralized planning problem collapses into infinite sequences of T>1 dimensional sub-problems which are each within the decision maker's limited computing range. Based on the time length of the planning horizon and the nature of expectations, the resulting framework in which both forecasts and plans may get revised in the light of new information encompasses at the limits the benchmark infinite horizon case with perfect foresight, a rolling infinite horizon case, a self-fulfilling static planning case and Day's, 1969 two-period heuristic case. Under exogenous price and quantity growth forecasts consistent with the perfect foresight steady-state balanced growth path, the time length of the planning horizon may have no effect on the resulting competitive equilibrium which may deviate dramatically from the optimal solution. When these growth forecasts are endogenous, the competitive equilibrium effects of the planning horizon time length depend on the characteristics of the information sets. The resulting model may help us to better understand how economies respond to shocks by unraveling new propagation mechanisms related to changes in optimism or pessimism about short-run and/or long-run growth prospects.

Suggested Citation

  • Cellarier, L.L., 2023. "Flexible time horizon planning, learning and aggregate fluctuations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 268-291.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:215:y:2023:i:c:p:268-291
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.09.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016726812300330X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.09.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gale, David, 1973. "Pure exchange equilibrium of dynamic economic models," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 12-36, February.
    2. Preston, Bruce, 2006. "Adaptive learning, forecast-based instrument rules and monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 507-535, April.
    3. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    4. Day, Richard H, 1969. "Flexible Utility and Myopic Expectations in Economic Growth," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 299-311, November.
    5. George W. Evans, 2001. "Expectations in Macroeconomics. Adaptive versus Eductive Learning," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 52(3), pages 573-582.
    6. Herbert Dawid, 2005. "Long horizon versus short horizon planning in dynamic optimization problems with incomplete information," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 25(3), pages 575-597, April.
    7. King, Robert G. & Rebelo, Sergio T., 1999. "Resuscitating real business cycles," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 14, pages 927-1007, Elsevier.
    8. Kenneth Matheny & Charles Noussair, 2000. "An experimental study of decisions in dynamic optimization problems," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 15(2), pages 389-419.
    9. Dawid, Herbert & Day, Richard H., 2007. "On sustainable growth and collapse: Optimal and adaptive paths," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 2374-2397, July.
    10. King, Robert G. & Plosser, Charles I. & Rebelo, Sergio T., 1988. "Production, growth and business cycles : I. The basic neoclassical model," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 195-232.
    11. Cellarier, Laurent, 2006. "Constant gain learning and business cycles," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 51-85, March.
    12. Pingle, Mark & Day, Richard H., 1996. "Modes of economizing behavior: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 191-209, March.
    13. Nicholas Kaldor, 1961. "Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth," International Economic Association Series, in: D. C. Hague (ed.), The Theory of Capital, chapter 0, pages 177-222, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Hui & Jiang, Fuwei & Zhang, Shan & Zhang, Zhining, 2024. "Managerial myopia and corporate social responsibility：Evidence from the textual analysis of Chinese earnings communication conferences," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cellarier, Laurent L., 2008. "Least squares learning and business cycles," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(3-4), pages 553-564, December.
    2. Giovanni Dosi & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini & Joseph E. Stiglitz & Tania Treibich, 2020. "Rational Heuristics? Expectations And Behaviors In Evolving Economies With Heterogeneous Interacting Agents," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(3), pages 1487-1516, July.
    3. Kuang, Pei & Mitra, Kaushik, 2016. "Long-run growth uncertainty," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 67-80.
    4. Sergio Rebelo, 2005. "Real Business Cycle Models: Past, Present and Future," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 107(2), pages 217-238, June.
    5. Mitra, Kaushik & Evans, George W. & Honkapohja, Seppo, 2013. "Policy change and learning in the RBC model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1947-1971.
    6. Etro, Federico, 2017. "Research in economics and macroeconomics," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 373-383.
    7. Mitra, Kaushik & Evans, George W. & Honkapohja, Seppo, 2019. "Fiscal Policy Multipliers In An Rbc Model With Learning," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 240-283, January.
    8. Dongya Koh & Raül Santaeulàlia-Llopis, 2017. "Countercyclical Elasticity of Substitution," Working Papers 946, Barcelona School of Economics.
    9. Marco Airaudo & Salvatore Nisticò & Luis‐Felipe Zanna, 2015. "Learning, Monetary Policy, and Asset Prices," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(7), pages 1273-1307, October.
    10. Juan Equiza Goni, 2014. "Sovereign Debt in the U.S. and Growth Expectations," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2014-25, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2008-056 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. George Kapetanios & Stephen Millard & Katerina Petrova & Simon Price, 2018. "Time varying cointegration and the UK great ratios," CAMA Working Papers 2018-53, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    13. Lilia Maliar & Serguei Maliar & John B. Taylor & Inna Tsener, 2020. "A tractable framework for analyzing a class of nonstationary Markov models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 1289-1323, November.
    14. Jing Dang & Max Gillman & Michal Kejak, 2011. "Real Business Cycles with a Human Capital Investment Sector and Endogenous Growth: Persistence, Volatility and Labor Puzzles," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1128, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    15. Minchul Yum, 2018. "On the distribution of wealth and employment," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 30, pages 86-105, October.
    16. James Bullard & Eric Schaling, 2009. "Monetary Policy, Determinacy, and Learnability in a Two‐Block World Economy," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(8), pages 1585-1612, December.
    17. Ivan Jaccard & Frank Smets, 2020. "Structural Asymmetries and Financial Imbalances in the Eurozone," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 36, pages 73-102, April.
    18. Emi Nakamura & Jón Steinsson, 2018. "Identification in Macroeconomics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 59-86, Summer.
    19. Christopher M. Gunn, 2018. "Overaccumulation, Interest, and Prices," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 50(2-3), pages 479-511, March.
    20. Florin O. Bilbiie & Fabio Ghironi & Marc J. Melitz, 2012. "Endogenous Entry, Product Variety, and Business Cycles," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 120(2), pages 304-345.
    21. Wolfgang Maennig & Viktoria C. E. Schumann, 2022. "Prevention Effect of News Shocks in Anti-Doping Policies," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 431-459, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:215:y:2023:i:c:p:268-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.