Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220175420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Of The Stereometric Method To The Analysis Of Economic Categories And Processes And Its Application In Security And Taxation

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Nusinov

    (Kryvyi Rih National University, Ukraine)

  • Ievgeniia Mishchuk

    (Kryvyi Rih National University, Ukraine)

  • Yaroslav Izmaylov

    (Kryvyi Rih Economic Institute of Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine)

Abstract
The article is aimed at the enhancement of the stereometric approach to analysing economic categories and processes and investigating directions of its application in the science of security and taxation. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study consists of general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, a comparative study of existing models of economic categories, which are based on the stereometric approach. The empirical method is used to describe the problem of using a stereometric approach to determining the economic security of an enterprise. The results of the study. The article demonstrates that modern realities increasingly require spatial thinking from economists, thus conditioning the appearance of 3D models of some economic categories in economic research papers. A number of stereometric elements have been applied by both foreign and Ukrainian scholars in the economic sphere for several decades. The article points out that no current model could claim the complete realization of the stereometric approach as an independent unidirectional array of the content of principles and methods of analysing economic categories and processes. There are also determined regularities not considered by other scientists, as well as current problems and omissions. Practical implications. There are substantiated differences between the stereometric and graphical methods of economic analysis. The stereometric approach is suggested to be meant as one of the economic analysis approaches based on visualization of economic categories and processes on the basis of geometric solids allowing qualitative and quantitative assessment of the level and dynamics of the selected array of indicators put into a single graphical model. There is revealed essence and principles of the stereometric approach use in the economy and in the science of security in particular. Economic security is treated as one of the ternary nature being resources, processes and a condition simultaneously. The article suggests a pyramid to determine economic security and proves that changes of quality, speed, and quantity of business processes expressed by changes of corresponding angles of the pyramid impact both the condition and the general level of economic security. Relevance/originality. The presented proposals on enhancing the stereometric approach create a theoretical foundation for applied research in various industries. The enhanced stereometric approach enables building a general-theoretical concept of economic security considering its connections with such notions as competitiveness and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Nusinov & Ievgeniia Mishchuk & Yaroslav Izmaylov, 2019. "Development Of The Stereometric Method To The Analysis Of Economic Categories And Processes And Its Application In Security And Taxation," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2017:5:4:20
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-160-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/719
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-160-170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chinhui Juhn & Kristin McCue & Holly Monti & Brooks Pierce, 2018. "Firm Performance and the Volatility of Worker Earnings," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(S1), pages 99-131.
    2. Craig W. Holden & Stacey Jacobsen & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2014. "The Empirical Analysis of Liquidity," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 8(4), pages 263-365, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mishchuk Ievgeniia, 2020. "Development of modern directions of estimatology in the economic security of the enterprise," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 6(4(56)), pages 22-28.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maksym Odnorog & Nataliia Kraus & Kateryna Kraus, 2019. "The Features Of Entrepreneurial Interactions In The Agricultural Sector In Terms Of Institutional Transformations," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(4).
    2. Gniadkowska-Szymańska Agata, 2017. "The impact of trading liquidity on the rate of return on emerging markets: the example of Poland and the Baltic countries," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 136-148, December.
    3. Reizer, Balázs, 2022. "Employment and Wage Consequences of Flexible Wage Components," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Adamopoulou, Effrosyni & Manaresi, Francesco & Rachedi, Omar & Yurdagul, Emircan, 2021. "Minimum Wages and Insurance within the Firm," IZA Discussion Papers 14943, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Wenjing Duan & Pedro S. Martins, 2022. "Rent sharing in China: Magnitude, heterogeneity and drivers," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 176-219, March.
    6. O’Hara, Maureen, 2015. "High frequency market microstructure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 257-270.
    7. Chen, Jiayuan & Gong, Di & Muckley, Cal, 2020. "Stock market illiquidity, bargaining power and the cost of borrowing," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 181-206.
    8. Black, Jeffrey R. & Stock, Duane & Yadav, Pradeep K., 2016. "The pricing of different dimensions of liquidity: Evidence from government guaranteed bonds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 119-132.
    9. Jurksas Linas, 2018. "What Factors Shape the Liquidity Levels of Euro Area Sovereign Bonds?," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 154-166, December.
    10. Benjamin Friedrich & Costas Meghir & Lisa Laun & Luigi Pistaferri, 2018. "Earnings Dynamics and Firm-Level Shocks," 2018 Meeting Papers 536, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    11. Christine Blandhol & Magne Mogstad & Peter Nilsson & Ola L. Vestad, 2020. "Do Employees Benefit from Worker Representation on Corporate Boards?," Working Papers 2020-183, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    12. Fabisik, Kornelia & Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger & Stulz, René M. & Taillard, Jérôme P., 2021. "Why are firms with more managerial ownership worth less?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 699-725.
    13. Zeynep Cobandag Guloglu & Cumhur Ekinci, 2022. "Liquidity measurement: A comparative review of the literature with a focus on high frequency," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 41-74, February.
    14. Efstathios Panayi & Gareth Peters & Ioannis Kosmidis, 2014. "Liquidity commonality does not imply liquidity resilience commonality: A functional characterisation for ultra-high frequency cross-sectional LOB data," Papers 1406.5486, arXiv.org.
    15. Jia Jia Hing & Yee Peng Chow, 2022. "Influence of institutional investor heterogeneity on stock liquidity and its underlying liquidity channels," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 252-278.
    16. Thierry Foucault & Roman Kozhan & Wing Wah Tham, 2017. "Toxic Arbitrage," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(4), pages 1053-1094.
    17. repec:grz:wpsses:2018-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Lim, Kian-Ping & Thian, Tze-Chung & Hooy, Chee-Wooi, 2015. "Corporate Shareholdings and the Liquidity of Malaysian Stocks: Investor Heterogeneity, Trading Account Types and the Underlying Channels," MPRA Paper 67602, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Efstathios Panayi & Gareth W. Peters & Ioannis Kosmidis, 2015. "Liquidity commonality does not imply liquidity resilience commonality: a functional characterisation for ultra-high frequency cross-sectional LOB data," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(10), pages 1737-1758, October.
    20. Ellington, Michael & Fu, Xi & Zhu, Yunyi, 2023. "Real estate illiquidity and returns: A time-varying regional perspective," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 58-72.
    21. Lachowska, Marta & Mas, Alexandre & Woodbury, Stephen A., 2022. "How reliable are administrative reports of paid work hours?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    analysis; economic security; taxation; process; stereometric approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B49 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Other
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm
    • Y10 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Data: Tables and Charts - - - Data: Tables and Charts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2017:5:4:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.