Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlorco/163923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free Riding or Trust? Why Members (do not) Monitor their Cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • NILSSON, JERKER
  • SVENDSEN, GERT TINGGAARD
Abstract
It is often observed that members have little interest in monitoring their cooperatives. One explanation is that the members are free riders, hoping that others will perform the task. Another explanation is that the weak member interest is a consequence of members having trust in the leadership. These competing explanations refer to the theory of collective action and the social capital paradigm, respectively, and may be linked to the classical Gesellschaft and Gemeinschaft concepts. Hence, one may expect free-rider behavior when conditions of Gesellschaft exist and trustful behavior when Gemeinschaft conditions rule. These propositions get support from five previous studies of members’ readership of the annual reports of their cooperative. In large and heterogeneous memberships there is free-riding behavior, which explains the members’ low interest in governing their cooperatives. To a limited extent a membership may have a subset of members who trust the leadership so they do not read the annual reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilsson, Jerker & Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard, 2011. "Free Riding or Trust? Why Members (do not) Monitor their Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 39(2), pages 1-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:163923
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.163923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/163923/files/Nilsson%20jrc39-2_2011_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.163923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris N. Chryssochoou, 1997. "New Challenges to the Study of European Integration: Implications for Theory‐Building," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 521-542, December.
    2. Shanahan, Yvonne P. & Lord, Beverley R. & Robb, Alan J., 2007. "Annual Report Readership: A Study of an Agricultural Supply Cooperative," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 35(2), pages 1-24.
    3. Dirk van der Krogt & Jerker Nilsson & Viggo Høst, 2007. "The impact of cooperatives' risk aversion and equity capital constraints on their inter-firm consolidation and collaboration strategies-with an empirical study of the European dairy industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4), pages 453-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hakelius, Karin & Hansson, Helena, 2016. "Members’ attitudes towards cooperatives and their perception of agency problems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(4), October.
    2. Li Feng & Anna Friis & Jerker Nilsson, 2016. "Social Capital among Members in Grain Marketing Cooperatives of Different Sizes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 113-126, January.
    3. Grashuis, Jasper & Cook, Michael Lee, 2021. "Members of cooperatives: more heterogeneous, less satisfied?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(5), April.
    4. Chrysoula MORFI & Jerker NILSSON & Hanna ÖSTERBERG, 2018. "Why Farmers Involve Themselves In Co‐Operative District Councils," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(4), pages 581-598, December.
    5. Smaïl Amghrous & Damien Rousselière, 2019. "L’implication des agriculteurs dans les coopératives dans un pays en transition vers une économie de marché : Une application aux coopératives agricoles de services algériennes," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(4), pages 724-749, September.
    6. Justine Valette & Paul Amadieu & Patrick Sentis, 2018. "Les coopératives résistent-elles mieux ? Une analyse de survie des coopératives agricoles françaises," Post-Print hal-01990418, HAL.
    7. Karin Hakelius & Jerker Nilsson, 2020. "The Logic behind the Internal Governance of Sweden’s Largest Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Andreea Preluca & Karin Hakelius & Cecilia Mark-Herbert, 2022. "Sustainability of Worker Co-Operatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Chrysoula Morfi & Jerker Nilsson & Karin Hakelius & Kostas Karantininis, 2021. "Social networks and member participation in cooperative governance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 264-285, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas P. Cornett, 1998. "The problem of transition and reintegration of East and Central Europe: conceptual remarks and empirical problems," ERSA conference papers ersa98p185, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Juan Juliá-Igual & Elena Meliá-Martí & Gabriel García-Martinez, 2012. "Strategies developed by leading EU agrifood cooperatives in their growth models," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 6(1), pages 27-46, March.
    3. Hohler, J., 2018. "Reconstruction of empirical strategies using content analysis - an application to the dairy industry," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277123, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Royer, Jeffrey S., 2012. "Implications of the Cooperative Organizational Form for Vertical Expansion," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 40(2), pages 1-20.
    5. Jasper GRASHUIS & Ye SU, 2019. "A Review Of The Empirical Literature On Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership And Governance, Finance, And Member Attitude," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 77-102, March.
    6. Nilsson, Jerker, 2024. "Differentiated voting and membership composition – the case of a large Swedish dairy cooperative," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 15(02), June.
    7. Andreas P. Cornett, 2003. "Economic and Political Perspectives on Integration in the Baltic Sea Region," ERSA conference papers ersa03p31, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Vidal García, Raúl & Ribal Sanchis, Javier & Blasco Ruiz, Ana, 2021. "Stock market multiples in the valuation of unlisted agrifood companies. || Múltiplos de mercado en la valoración de empresas agroalimentarias no cotizadas," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 31(1), pages 198-225, June.
    9. Shaoze Jin & Xiangping Jia & Harvey S. James, 2021. "Risk attitudes within farmer cooperative organizations: Evidence from China's fresh apple industry," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 173-205, June.
    10. Salavou, Helen E. & Sergaki, Panagiota, 2013. "Generic Business Strategies in Greece: Private Food Firms versus Agricultural Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 41(1), pages 1-17.
    11. Grashuis, Jasper & Cook, Michael, 2016. "Capital, Ownership, and Governance: Analyzing the Structure of U.S. Farmer Cooperatives," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235677, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Jos BIJMAN & Markus HANISCH, 2020. "Understanding the heterogeneity among agricultural cooperatives," CIRIEC Working Papers 2013, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    13. Elena MELIÁ MARTÍ & Ma Pía CARNICER ANDRÉS, 2015. "Organizational models for the major agri-food cooperative groups in the European Union," CIRIEC Working Papers 1506, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    14. Cornett, Andreas P., 1999. "Regional Integration and regional development? - Concepts and empirical relevance," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa021, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Declerck, Francis, 2015. "Financial Instruments and Conflicts of Interest: Application to French Agricultural Co-operatives," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Mateos-Ronco, Alicia & Guzman-Asuncion, Sandra, 2018. "Determinants of financing decisions and management implications: evidence from Spanish agricultural cooperatives," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    17. George Hendrikse & Li Feng, 2013. "Interfirm cooperatives," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Charlebois, Sylvain, 2016. "Policy-change Triggered Environmental Uncertainty in a Dairy Cooperative: The Case of Mila in South Tyrol," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:163923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caehuil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.