Author
Listed:
- Judith Freedman
(University of Oxford)
AbstractJohn Braithwaite’s seminal work on responsive regulation has been taken up and developed by tax authorities around the world. It has had a major impact on methods of tax administration. This approach has some limitations and difficulties, however, including constitutional objections. This article discusses two particular problems, together with possible responses, which could help to appease the critics of responsive regulation in the tax arena. The first problem relates to the extent to which persuasion is a legitimate device for seeking to control behaviour that is not universally accepted to be non-compliant, because there is more than one arguable view. The second area of difficulty relates to the relationship between responsive regulation and risk management. These issues and the general challenges posed by responsive regulation to tax administration are discussed in the context of changing relationships between revenue authorities and large businesses, using a UK case study. In conclusion it is suggested that the theory of responsive regulation has great value in tax administration, but also the potential for misfiring in this area unless applied and used only where appropriate legal safeguards are provided. Legally enforceable safeguards are required to maintain the rule of law and provide a clear framework of objectives. This is not inconsistent with a theoretical approach that rests upon mutual trust; rather a sensible legal framework can provide an appropriate background for a relationship of trust. Such a legal framework is necessary not only to protect taxpayers but also revenue authorities. Building trust and involving interest groups in “regulatory conversations” are important parts of the answer, but in a tax context this must be supported by legal structures and be subject to administrative safeguards or it will not be perceived to be fair, in which case responsive regulation will fail.
Suggested Citation
Judith Freedman, 2011.
"Responsive Regulation, Risk, and Rules: Applying the Theory to Tax Practice,"
Working Papers
1119, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
Handle:
RePEc:btx:wpaper:1119
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Siglé, Maarten A. & Goslinga, Sjoerd & Speklé, Roland F. & van der Hel, Lisette E.C.J.M., 2022.
"The cooperative approach to corporate tax compliance: An empirical assessment,"
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:1119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dongxian Guo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbsoxuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.