Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/upj/ubooks/apge.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Are Participants Good Evaluators?

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Smith

    (University of Wisconsin)

  • Alexander Whalley

    (University of Calgary)

  • Nathaniel Wilcox

    (Appalachian State University)

Abstract
Managers of workforce training programs are often unable to afford costly, full-fledged experimental or nonexperimental evaluations to determine their programs’ impacts. Therefore, many rely on the survey responses of program participants to gauge program impacts. Smith, Whalley, and Wilcox present the first attempt to assess such measures despite their already widespread use in program evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Smith & Alexander Whalley & Nathaniel Wilcox, 2021. "Are Participants Good Evaluators?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number apge, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:upj:ubooks:apge
    DOI: 10.17848/9780880996594
    Note: PDF of first chapter is available.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17848/9780880996594
    Download Restriction: All books are copyrighted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17848/9780880996594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Jakob, Konstantin Buechel, Daniel Steffen, Aymo Brunetti, 2023. "Participatory Teaching Improves Learning Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Tanzania," Diskussionsschriften dp2310, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    2. Jeffrey Smith, 2022. "Treatment Effect Heterogeneity," Evaluation Review, , vol. 46(5), pages 652-677, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    program evaluation; workforce programs; participant evaluation measures;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J68 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Public Policy
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upj:ubooks:apge. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/upjohus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.