Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/251896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Teleworking Growth Model

Author

Listed:
  • Bran, Florina
  • Tudorache, Maria-Daniela
  • Nicolescu, Andreea Florentina
  • Bodislav, Dumitru Alexandru
  • Oancea Negescu, Mihaela Diana
  • Popescu, Maria Loredana
Abstract
This paper assesses the impact of telework on economic growth in the European Union using Feasible Generalized Least Squares method, applied to a Panel of 27 Member States, in the period 2010-2019. The econometric model also analyses the impact of the rate of employed population not working from home on the economic growth, to facilitate the comparative analysis of telework and traditional work. The results indicate a greater impact of telework on economic growth, than that exerted by the rate of employed population not working from home, the effect being manifested through the channel of labour productivity. However, the paper examines the short-term relationship between these variables and does not exclude the reduction of the impact of telework on economic growth to a lower level than the specific effect of traditional work, on medium or longterm.

Suggested Citation

  • Bran, Florina & Tudorache, Maria-Daniela & Nicolescu, Andreea Florentina & Bodislav, Dumitru Alexandru & Oancea Negescu, Mihaela Diana & Popescu, Maria Loredana, 2022. "A New Teleworking Growth Model," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 125-139.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:251896
    DOI: 10.24818/18423264/56.1.22.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251896/1/A%20NEW%20TELEWORKING%20GROWTH%20MODEL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24818/18423264/56.1.22.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina-Mihaela Dima & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Diana-Maria Vrânceanu & Gabriela Țigu, 2019. "Sustainable Social and Individual Implications of Telework: A New Insight into the Romanian Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Helena Lopes & Sérgio Lagoa & Teresa Calapez, 2014. "Work autonomy, work pressure, and job satisfaction: An analysis of European Union countries," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 306-326, June.
    3. Elldér, Erik, 2020. "Telework and daily travel: New evidence from Sweden," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Kazekami, Sachiko, 2020. "Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Gálvez & Francisco Tirado & M. Jesús Martínez, 2020. "Work–Life Balance, Organizations and Social Sustainability: Analyzing Female Telework in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Eric Brunelle & Jo-Annie Fortin, 2021. "Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: An Examination of Teleworkers’ and Office Workers’ Job Satisfaction Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    3. Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Dan Ioan Topor & Mircea Constantin Duică & Sorina Geanina Stanescu & Nicoleta Valentina Florea & Mariana Zamfir & Mihaela Denisa Coman, 2022. "Sustainability Analysis, Implications, and Effects of the Teleworking System in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Wieteke Conen & Paul de Beer, 2021. "When two (or more) do not equal one: an analysis of the changing nature of multiple and single jobholding in Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(2), pages 165-180, May.
    5. Alpana Agarwal & Divina Raghav, 2023. "Analysing Determinants of Employee Performance Based on Reverse Mentoring and Employer Branding Using Analytic Hierarchical Process," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 48(3), pages 343-358, August.
    6. Hani Al-Dmour & Rima Al Hasan & Motasem Thneibat & Ra’ed Masa’deh & Wafa Alkhadra & Rand Al-Dmour & Ali Alalwan, 2023. "Integrated Model for the Factors Determining the Academic’s Remote Working Productivity and Engagement: Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    7. Bratianu Constantin, 2020. "Toward understanding the complexity of the COVID-19 crisis: a grounded theory approach," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(s1), pages 410-423, October.
    8. Alexander Matros & Vladimir Smirnov & Andrew Wait & Helen Zhang, 2023. "Microfoundations of work intensification and burnout," Working Papers 2023-02, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    9. Corinna E Löckenhoff & Johanna Drewelies & Sandra Duezel & Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen & Ilja Demuth & Alexandra M Freund & Ursula M Staudinger & Ulman Lindenberger & Gert G Wagner & Nilam Ram & Den, 2022. "Sociohistorical Change in Urban Older Adults’ Perceived Speed of Time and Time Pressure," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(3), pages 457-466.
    10. Stefano Dughera, 2020. "Skills, preferences and rights: evolutionary complementarities in labor organization," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 843-866, July.
    11. Toshihiro Okubo, 2024. "Non‐routine tasks and ICT tools in telework," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 38(2), pages 177-202, June.
    12. Kostiantyn Ovsiannikov & Koji Kotani & Hodaka Morita, 2022. "Online productivity and types of assignments in a Japanese workplace," Working Papers SDES-2022-5, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised May 2022.
    13. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Bruna Ferrara & Martina Pansini & Clara De Vincenzi & Ilaria Buonomo & Paula Benevene, 2022. "Investigating the Role of Remote Working on Employees’ Performance and Well-Being: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    15. Begoña Urien, 2023. "Teleworkability, Preferences for Telework, and Well-Being: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.
    16. Amaya Erro-Garcés & Begoña Urien & Giedrius Čyras & Vita Marytė Janušauskienė, 2022. "Telework in Baltic Countries during the Pandemic: Effects on Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction, and Work-Life Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Carlos A. Arbelaez-Velasquez & Diana Giraldo & Santiago Quintero, 2022. "Analysis of a Teleworking Technology Adoption Case: An Agent-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Argyro Avgoustaki & Hans T. W. Frankort, 2019. "Implications of Work Effort and Discretion for Employee Well-Being and Career-Related Outcomes: An Integrative Assessment," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 72(3), pages 636-661, May.
    19. Nicole Maestas & Kathleen J. Mullen & David Powell & Till von Wachter & Jeffrey B. Wenger, 2023. "The Value of Working Conditions in the United States and the Implications for the Structure of Wages," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(7), pages 2007-2047, July.
    20. Iwona Staniec & Dominika Kaczorowska-Spychalska & Magdalena Kalinska-Kula & Nina Szczygiel, 2022. "The Study of Emotional Effects of Digitalised Work: The Case of Higher Education in the Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    telework; economic growth; productivity; impact; model; European Union;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:251896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.