Recent work shows norms and pragmatics help establish relevant contrasts when reasoning about omissions (see. Henne, Pinillos, & De Brigard, 2016).
Omissions figure prominently in causal reasoning fromdiagnosis to ascriptions of negligence. One philosophicalproposal posits that omissions are accompanied ...
Jul 18, 2018 · The theory of mental models supposes that reasoners construct only one possibility (the omission) by default, and that they consider separate ...
Dec 1, 2017 · A psychological hypothesis can be drawn from this contrast view of omissions: by default, humans should interpret omissive causations as ...
People also ask
What is the fallacy of omission?
What is a omissive causation?
Free and easy to use, OSF supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery. Create an account or learn more .
One theory states that people represent omissive causes as force vectors; another states that omissions are representations of contrasting counterfactual ...
I offer a new asymmetry thesis, and I argue that this new asymmetry thesis succeeds in capturing the moral asymmetry between actions and omissions that is ...
Aug 26, 2021 · Contrasts are not set in stone. What makes a contrast relevant depends on contextual aspects, the mental framework, and various linguistic and ...
These three possibilities are infinite regression, circular reasoning, or bare assertions without any evidence.
Missing: Contrasts | Show results with:Contrasts
Nov 23, 2020 · In other cases, such as 'Ali's failure to take her medication' or 'Ali's abstaining from alcohol,' we are reluctant to equate an omission with ...