Recent work shows norms and pragmatics help establish relevant contrasts when reasoning about omissions (see. Henne, Pinillos, & De Brigard, 2016).
Contrasts in reasoning about omissions ... Omissions figure prominently in causal reasoning fromdiagnosis to ascriptions of negligence. One philosophicalproposal ...
Jul 18, 2018 · Contrasts in reasoning about omissions · Sangeet Khemlani · Gordon Briggs.
Dec 1, 2017 · Contrasts in reasoning about omissions. December 2017. Conference ... Omissions figure prominently in causal reasoning from diagnosis to ...
Contrasts in reasoning about omissions. Overview · Metadata · Files · OSF Storage · Wiki · Analytics · Registrations. Icon for OSF Storage OSF Storage.
People also ask
What is a omissive causation?
Omissions as Contrasts ... Philosophers such as Bernstein (2014) have proposed that omissions denote a “non-actualized possibility,” as in (12b). Bernstein ...
Contrasts in reasoning about omissions. P Bello, C Wasylyshyn, G Briggs, S Khemlani. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 39, 2017.
Contrasts in reasoning about omissions. P Bello, C Wasylyshyn, G Briggs, S Khemlani. CogSci, 2017. 5, 2017. Word spotting in a multichannel virtual auditory ...
27. As for the probability ratings, planned contrasts showed that the difference between “went through” and “missed” was significant in ...
The 6-4-2 triple makes the relevant contrast immediately evident; the 9-8-1 triple contrasts in more than one dimension and thus only to some extent shifts the ...