-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #37855 - Populate OS fields and pass correct network during import #10333
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
|
|||
<%= select_f f, :architecture_id, accessible_resource(f.object, :architecture), :id, :to_label, {:include_blank => true}, | |||
{: 'architecture_selected(this);', :'data-url' => method_path('architecture_selected'), :'data-type' => controller_name.singularize, | |||
{: 'architecture_selected(this);', :'data-url' => method_path('architecture_selected'), :'data-type' => "host", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if that's the way to go, since we are also using this form for hostgroups
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we are using https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/blob/develop/app/views/common/os_selection/_operatingsystem.html.erb for hostgroups
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, you are right we are not using this one, my bad.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this template is only used in the host form (which includes VMs as well). I'm considering whether we should just pass data-type
as host
, or if it would be clearer and more consistent with the rest of the code to add a specific check for this scenario.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can override the controller_name
to "host" for the compute_resources_vm controller but I guess that could maybe break things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we have no other option in this case!
I think it shall most probably not impact other use cases but I'm open to any alternative approaches anyone may have!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since all other forms use the same syntax (e.g., 'data-type' => controller_name.singularize
), I suggest we only handle the special case where the controller is ComputeResourcesVms
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@girijaasoni any thoughts on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's exactly what we are doing, we can override it as well but its just the same approach
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant, maybe we could make this clearer by adding a condition like this:
{: class="pl-kos">> 'architecture_selected(this);', :'data-url' => method_path('architecture_selected'), :'data-type' => "host", | |
{: class="pl-kos">> 'architecture_selected(this);', :'data-url' => method_path('architecture_selected'), :'data-type' => controller_name.singularize == 'compute_resources_vm' ? 'host' : controller_name.singularize, |
Since controller_name.singularize
is already used elsewhere in the code, it might make sense to keep using it consistently here too.
No description provided.