Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump sccache for linux x86_64 to allow caching while PGO'd #133076

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

klensy
Copy link
Contributor
@klensy klensy commented Nov 15, 2024

This bumps sccache for linux-only jobs to allow sccache work with PGO mozilla/sccache#952

This is improvement: 2h05m -> 1h44m (from 1 run) for dist-x86_64-linux #133033 (comment)

Why still use old release? Commit with improvement was old, so i used some release around. In future, more recent versions can be tested to see if there any improvements, while this one already gives one.

aarch64 update shouldn't change much, as there no PGO used.

For other OSes i will create separate PRs later.

r? infra

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 15, 2024
@klensy
Copy link
Contributor Author
klensy commented Nov 15, 2024

r? infra-ci

@rustbot rustbot assigned Mark-Simulacrum and unassigned kennytm Nov 15, 2024
@klensy
Copy link
Contributor Author
klensy commented Nov 15, 2024

No promises about correct work with PGO :-)

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor
Kobzol commented Nov 15, 2024

r? @Kobzol

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 15, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
bump sccache for linux x86_64 to allow caching while PGO'd

This bumps sccache for linux-only jobs to allow sccache work with PGO mozilla/sccache#952

This is improvement: 2h05m -> 1h44m (from 1 run) for `dist-x86_64-linux` rust-lang#133033 (comment)

Why still use old release? Commit with improvement was old, so i used some release around. In future, more recent versions can be tested to see if there any improvements, while this one already gives one.

aarch64 update shouldn't change much, as there no PGO used.

For other OSes i will create separate PRs later.

r? infra
@bors
Copy link
Contributor
bors commented Nov 15, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 876d02e with merge a0fe848...

@mati865
Copy link
Contributor
mati865 commented Nov 15, 2024

There is mozilla/sccache#1178 saying the first build will be fine, but later ones are failing. Definitely something to keep in mind if somebody notices spurious failures after merge.

I'm a bit curious how the versions were selected. Previously it was upgraded to the latest available version.
I've seen (in another project) some small but measurable performance improvement with some 0.7.x version due to the preprocessor caching.

@klensy
Copy link
Contributor Author
klensy commented Nov 16, 2024

Now I think that I can be wrong with time improvement, because compared try build with auto. Yes, unrolled build around 1h47m, sad.
Why old version? I mentioned that in first message, plus didn't want to mix few changes, like pgo, preprocessor, etc.

@klensy
Copy link
Contributor Author
klensy commented Nov 16, 2024

Well, in that case I will hold that PR and update to more recent version to check other features.

@mati865
Copy link
Contributor
mati865 commented Nov 16, 2024

Oh shoot, I had read half of the description when I was interrupted. After coming back to it, I didn't remember to finish reading.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor
bors commented Nov 16, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a0fe848 (a0fe8484f01f73841286024a032130e545185726)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a0fe848): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.9% [2.2%, 3.6%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.9% [2.2%, 3.6%] 2

Cycles

Results (primary 11.9%, secondary 2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
11.9% [2.5%, 25.2%] 13
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [1.9%, 3.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 11.9% [2.5%, 25.2%] 13

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 788.599s -> 786.623s (-0.25%)
Artifact size: 335.45 MiB -> 335.42 MiB (-0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 16, 2024
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor
Kobzol commented Nov 16, 2024

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 16, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor
bors commented Nov 16, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 876d02e with merge fc7d7eb...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2024
bump sccache for linux x86_64 to allow caching while PGO'd

This bumps sccache for linux-only jobs to allow sccache work with PGO mozilla/sccache#952

This is improvement: 2h05m -> 1h44m (from 1 run) for `dist-x86_64-linux` rust-lang#133033 (comment)

Why still use old release? Commit with improvement was old, so i used some release around. In future, more recent versions can be tested to see if there any improvements, while this one already gives one.

aarch64 update shouldn't change much, as there no PGO used.

For other OSes i will create separate PRs later.

r? infra
@klensy
Copy link
Contributor Author
klensy commented Nov 16, 2024

some small but measurable performance improvement with some 0.7.x version due to the preprocessor caching.

Isn't direct mode for local only cache?

@mati865
Copy link
Contributor
mati865 commented Nov 16, 2024

Right, in our setup, each builder keeps its own cache (local mode). This obviously works only with self hosted agents.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor
bors commented Nov 16, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: fc7d7eb (fc7d7eb691184e3f481bd02a1b0d8e790fe35cba)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fc7d7eb): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 0.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.7%, 3.0%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-2.9%, -2.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (primary 1.2%, secondary 2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.2% [0.9%, 1.6%] 6
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.4%, 2.8%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.2% [0.9%, 1.6%] 6

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 788.11s -> 790.261s (0.27%)
Artifact size: 335.43 MiB -> 335.43 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants