Shift placement ot multistamp/multiwatermark by several pages #734
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hello! Thanks for the effort. This makes sense. |
|
Thanks for your time and input! This is part of https://github.com/pdfcpu/pdfcpu/releases/tag/v0.6.0 I have elaborated on your idea and pdfcpu now allows for specifying both the start page # of the stamp file and also the first page number of the destination file to apply multi stamping. Whenever possible any extension of a pdfcpu command also needs to be reflected on the CLI. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A possible implementation of #733.
The idea is to be able to configure the
Watermarkfor how many pages have to be skipped before applying multistamp/multiwatermark.My understanding of the internals of PDF is not that good, thus I suspect that this implementation is quite brute force.