add thread_some function (some-> macro) #379
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Any thoughts after two years? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In Clojure there is a
some->macro, which acts like->(thread-first), but without NullPointerException (or something likeunsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'int'for toolz). If one of forms returns nil(None), computation stops with nil as a result. This PR offers such functionality for toolz.In order not to implement something like Maybe monad for NoneType I find
some->macro in toolz very helpful.https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/some-%3E