Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing exchange config between Shetland Islands (GB-ZET) and Great Britain (GB) #7269

Open
VIKTORVAV99 opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #7534
Open

Missing exchange config between Shetland Islands (GB-ZET) and Great Britain (GB) #7269

VIKTORVAV99 opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #7534
Labels
exchange config Pull request or issue for exchange configurations good first issue help wanted

Comments

@VIKTORVAV99
Copy link
Member

Description

There are a new interconnector between these zones but we are missing a config for it.

It would be great if someone could add this!

@VIKTORVAV99 VIKTORVAV99 added help wanted good first issue exchange config Pull request or issue for exchange configurations labels Oct 1, 2024
@AJDelusion
Copy link
AJDelusion commented Oct 2, 2024

As Shetland is an integral part of the UK, it is now essentially part of the GB grid. It would be nice to be able to break out subregional generation if the data is made available, but I believe the stop gap for now is to simply include Shetland as part of the GB file shape, just as is currently done with the Outer Hebrides. I suggested this approach in #7121 . Shetland's new Viking Wind Farm will already be included in the GB figures.

@VIKTORVAV99
Copy link
Member Author

As Shetland is an integral part of the UK, it is now essentially part of the GB grid. It would be nice to be able to break out subregional generation if the data is made available, but I believe the stop gap for now is to simply include Shetland as part of the GB file shape, just as is currently done with the Outer Hebrides. I suggested this approach in #7121 . Shetland's new Viking Wind Farm will already be included in the GB figures.

Are we sure that the wind farm and the other generation is actually included in the main GB production?

@AJDelusion
Copy link

Not sure how to prove conclusively.

However, Viking Wind Farm reports to Elexon via REMIT so I'm not sure why it would be treated differently to any other onshore wind farms in GB now that Shetland is on the National Grid.

Terravolt treats it the same as any other onshore wind farm:
image

I believe the two remaining fossil power stations on Shetland (Lerwick and Sullom Voe) are both slated for closure now that the HVDC is in place.

@VIKTORVAV99
Copy link
Member Author

Not sure how to prove conclusively.

However, Viking Wind Farm reports to Elexon via REMIT so I'm not sure why it would be treated differently to any other onshore wind farms in GB now that Shetland is on the National Grid.

Terravolt treats it the same as any other onshore wind farm: image

I believe the two remaining fossil power stations on Shetland (Lerwick and Sullom Voe) are both slated for closure now that the HVDC is in place.

I thought they where only going to keep the plants operational but in a fallback capacity in case the DC links fails?

andrewb343 added a commit to andrewb343/electricitymaps-contrib that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2024
@andrewb343 andrewb343 linked a pull request Dec 10, 2024 that will close this issue
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
exchange config Pull request or issue for exchange configurations good first issue help wanted
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants