Isn't that what addOptionalPlugin is for?

Isn't that what addOptionalPlugin is for?

It is for dev dependencies (require-dev in composer.json).

Repl in not included neither in require or require-dev, only in suggest.

Sure, but it's the same concept. We could just comment it out I guess.

Sure, but it's the same concept. We could just comment it out I guess.

By that logic we should then optionally load

• markstory/asset_compress and
• dereuromark/cakephp-ide-helper

as well

Sure. If we're suggesting it. This is just a helpful template to show where things go, right.

I am fine with either one of the solutions - either remove all or add all suggestions which are actual CakePHP plugin suggestions

@ADmad what do you think? I don't have a strong opinion, just thought it could be used for this.

I don't have a strong opinion on this either but would lean towards removing it. I don't remember anyone mentioning using the repl plugin in any of our help channels in a long time.

Also one major gripe I have with the repl plugin / psysh is that it pulls in a symfony package which override our dd() function.

Sounds good, merging since this isn't a major issue.

either remove all or add all suggestions which are actual CakePHP plugin suggestions

Removing makes sense to me. We don't need to clutter people's applications with a bunch of commented out code when we also give them CLI tools to add the lines back in if required.