Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

Logo of geneticsLink to Publisher's site

Figure 9.—

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is GEN1781127f9.jpg

Possible models for enhancer bypass of the Mcp and su(Hw) boundaries in trans. (A) A model depicting trans activation of the ap gene on the apf00451 chromosome by the ap wing enhancer on the apMM-Mcp chromosome (see Figure 8, B and D). The additive effects of this trans activation (solid arrow) and the activation of ap by the unblocked, ap proximal portions of the ap wing enhancer on the apf00451 chromosome (dashed arrow) could account for the wild-type wings observed in apMM-Mcp/apf00451 trans-heterozygotes. (B) A model depicting how homology-driven chromosome pairing between the structurally dissimilar alleles apMM-Mcp and apf00451 could cause looping out and inactivation of the boundary elements, presumably due to conformational stress. (C) A model depicting pairing between the boundaries present in the apMM-Mcp and apf00451 inserts and two hypothetical boundaries on either side of the ap regulatory region. Such pairing would function to demarcate two distinct chromosomal domains, each of which would exhibit enhancer blocking when homozygous or hemizygous, but could lead to interallelic complementation when trans-heterozygous.

Images in this article

  • Figure 1.
  • Figure 2.
  • Figure 3.
  • Figure 4.
  • Figure 5.
  • Figure 6.
  • Figure 7.
  • Figure 8.
  • Figure 9.
Click on the image to see a larger version.