Abstract
Free full text
IL-1β-induced epithelial cell and fibroblast transdifferentiation promotes neutrophil recruitment in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Abstract
Neutrophilic inflammation contributes to multiple chronic inflammatory airway diseases, including asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Here, using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to profile human nasal mucosa obtained from the inferior turbinates, middle turbinates, and nasal polyps of CRSwNP patients, we identify two IL-1 signaling-induced cell subsets—LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts—that promote neutrophil recruitment by respectively releasing S100A8/A9 and CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8 into inflammatory regions. IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in IL-1 signaling, induces the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts from primary epithelial cells and fibroblasts, respectively. In an LPS-induced neutrophilic CRSwNP mouse model, blocking IL-1β activity with a receptor antagonist significantly reduces the numbers of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts and mitigates nasal inflammation. This study implicates the function of two cell subsets in neutrophil recruitment and demonstrates an IL-1-based intervention for mitigating neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP.
Introduction
Neutrophilic inflammation is prevalent in multiple chronic inflammatory airway diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and elevated neutrophilic inflammation is positively correlated with adverse patient outcomes1,2. CRS is a chronic disorder characterized by inflammation of the nasal mucosa and paranasal sinuses that affects 5–12% of the global adult population3. Patients with CRS and nasal polyps (CRSwNP) experience more severe clinical symptoms than those without nasal polyps4. Although CRSwNP exhibits a significant association with type 2 inflammation which is characterized by an immune response involving eosinophils5, the presence of a neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP has been demonstrated in a growing number of patients, and is considered to be associated with glucocorticosteroid resistance, a higher risk of recurrence after surgery, and worse disease outcomes6. However, neutrophilic inflammation has been relatively little studied, and therapeutic strategies targeting neutrophilic inflammation are currently insufficient in CRSwNP.
Multiple factors drive the neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP. CXC chemokines including CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8 are chemotactic factors that guide the neutrophils to the site of inflammation7. In a multi-center study, the concentrations of CXCL8 were shown to be greater in NP tissues than in control tissues, indicating its role in neutrophil recruitment of CRSwNP8. Increased protein levels of S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/A9, were demonstrated in the nasal polyp tissues of CRSwNP patients compared to those in the IT tissues of controls, suggesting evident neutrophil recruitment in CRSwNP9. Previous studies have demonstrated that cytokines derived from epithelial cells and stromal cells facilitate neutrophilic inflammation in CRS10,11. Nevertheless, specific cell types that secrete these factors and drive neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP remain ill-defined.
Here, seeking to identify epithelial and stromal cell subsets that contribute to neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP, we profile human nasal mucosa obtained from the middle turbinates (MTs), inferior turbinates (ITs), and nasal polyps (NPs) of CRSwNP patients and healthy individuals using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). After identifying contributions from LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts, we demonstrate their ability to facilitate neutrophil recruitment in cells stimulated with IL-1β, including primary fibroblasts and air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures developed from primary nasal epithelial cells. Blocking the activity of IL-1β attenuates nasal inflammation in an LPS-induced neutrophilic CRSwNP mouse model. These findings implicate the cell types that promote neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP and highlight potential therapeutic agents targeting IL-1β as interventions against neutrophilic CRSwNP.
Results
Single-cell profiling of nasal mucosa from multiple anatomical regions in CRSwNP patients identifies diverse disease-specific cell subsets
We initially profiled the CRSwNP cell type landscape by preparing freshly dissociated samples of middle turbinate (MT), inferior turbinate (IT), and nasal polyp (NP) tissues from CRSwNP patients and healthy individuals and obtaining full-length scRNA-seq profiles (Fig. 1a). Inferior turbinates have been used as control tissues for nasal polyps in previous studies12,13. Most NPs originate from the ethmoid sinuses located around the MT tissues, and MT tissue removal has been shown to reduce the recurrence of NPs in refractory CRS14. We therefore selected MT, IT, and NP tissues to compare differences in their cellular composition in an inflammatory milieu. Unsupervised clustering divided the 219,716 cells that passed strict quality control into six compartments with conserved signatures, including epithelial cells, T/innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), B/plasma cells, mononuclear phagocytes/dendritic cells (MNPs/DCs), mast cells, and stromal cells (Fig. 1b–d, Supplementary Fig. 1a–d and Supplementary Fig. 2). B/plasma cells, MNPs/DCs, and mast cells were barely detectable in the IT tissues from healthy individuals, supporting an extensive inflammatory milieu in both nasal polyps and nasal mucosa of CRSwNP patients, regardless of the anatomical regions in which they occur (Fig. (Fig.1b,1b, b,e).e). Of note, each of the subsets contained cells from each sample, indicating that the cell lineages and expression status were consistent throughout the samples and did not represent sample-specific subpopulations or batch effects (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b).
To identify cell subsets associated with inflammation regulation, we performed unsupervised clustering based on marker genes on the epithelial cell compartment, which revealed seven cell types annotated as basal cells, myoepithelial cells, club cells, goblet cells, ciliated cells, ionocytes, and glandular cells (GCs) (Fig. 1f). Among the identified subsets, LY6D+ club cells have not been reported, while the PRB1+ GC and MUC5B+ GC subsets were previously observed in the nasal mucosa of CRSwNP patients15. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that PRB1+ GCs are associated with erythrocyte renewal and metabolism, while MUC5B+ GCs are involved in protein glycosylation, especially mucin glycosylation (Supplementary Fig. 4a–d). The stromal cell compartment was divided into five cell types (endothelial cells, pericytes, fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and glia) and then further classified into 15 yet-finer subsets based on marker gene expression; among these subsets, PIEZO2+, IDO1+, and OXTR+ fibroblasts have not been reported in previous studies of nasal mucosa from CRSwNP patients (Fig. 1g, g,i).i). Given that OXTR+ fibroblasts were detected only in NP tissues, these cells may be involved in NPs development. The immune cell compartment was subclustered into five cell types, including mast cells, mononuclear phagocytes/dendritic cells (MNPs/DCs), plasma cells, B cells, and T/innate lymphoid cells (T/ILCs), which were subsequently grouped into 27 yet-finer subsets (Fig. 1h and Supplementary Fig. 5a–d). ILC1/2/3 were enriched in NP tissues, reflecting a mixed pattern of inflammation in CRSwNP16–18 (Supplementary Fig. 5c).
To demonstrate the relationship between cell subsets during differentiation, we constructed a transcription factor fate decision tree for cells spanning different anatomical regions (Fig. 1j, k). This analysis suggested that transcription factors, such as STAT1, ELF5, TEAD1, and CREB3, are regulons modulating the differentiation of different cell subsets, further demonstrating the correctness of the sub-clustering across the samples. Collectively, these findings reveal the cellular heterogeneity in the inflammatory environment across three anatomical regions and identify disease-specific cell subsets that may regulate immune response in CRSwNP.
IDO1+ fibroblasts and LY6D+ club cells contribute to neutrophil recruitment in CRSwNP
CRSwNP patients exhibit both eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation19. Increased neutrophilia and eosinophilia were detected in the mucosa of NP tissues from CRSwNP patients (Fig. 2a). We also used the xCell algorithm to quantify neutrophil infiltration in a bulk RNA-seq dataset of CRSwNP (GSE179265), and again detected the significantly elevated neutrophilia in CRSwNP samples as compared to healthy tissue samples (Fig. 2b). Seeking to identify epithelial and stromal cell subsets contributing to neutrophil infiltration, we generated an integrated dataset built from the data from this study and the data of neutrophils from another CRSwNP scRNA-seq dataset (HRA000772)20–22(Supplementary Fig. 6a), and subsequently used an algorithm combining Networkx, Community, and Pygraphviz to plot chemokine-chemokine receptor interaction networks and infer the strongly interacting cell subset pairs. Notable signals from the network included a superlatively strong interaction between IDO1+ fibroblasts and neutrophils (Fig. 2c), with MMP7+ GCs and LY6D+ club cells also interacting strongly with neutrophils (Fig. 2c).
In particular, the chemokine receptors enriched in neutrophils (CCR1 and CXCR1/2/4) matched extensively with chemokines highly expressed in IDO1+ fibroblasts (such as CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8 and CCL5/7/8/11)23,24(Fig. 2d). The interaction between neutrophils and MMP7+ GCs was characterized by high CXCR2 expression in neutrophils and strong CXCL2/3 expression in MMP7+ GCs. LY6D+ club cells interacted with neutrophils by expressing high levels of S100A8/A9, and their receptor TLR4 was expressed mainly on neutrophils (Fig. 2d). However, MMP7+ GCs did not show much difference in the proportion of total epithelial cells in different anatomical regions (Fig. 2e). They were probably a subset of cells with an intermediate state based on their low pseudotime ct values calculated by RNA velocity (Supplementary Fig. 4a–d). The gene expression pattern of the MMP7+ GCs in each tissue was exhibited in four groups of tissues (Supplementary Fig. 4e). Genes widely expressed in glands, such as PIP and STATH25, were observed in MMP7+ GCs from healthy inferior turbinates. Differentially expressed genes in CRS-IT showed abnormalities in cell proliferation and differentiation (TUBA1C, LMNA)26,27, ECM remodeling (ANXA2, TM4SF1)28,29 and tissue repair (GADD45A, S100A10)30,31. Characteristic genes in MMP7+ GCs in CRS-MT were mainly involved in immune defense (SOD2, LYZ, LTF)32,33. MMP7+ GCs in CRS-NP expressed factors involved in cell proliferation (LY6E, FOS)34 and antiviral activity (IFITM2 and IFITM3)35. Therefore, MMP7+ GCs were not considered to be associated with neutrophil infiltration in CRSwNP.
In contrast to that of MMP7+ GCs, the proportion of LY6D+ club cells was greater in the IT and NP tissues of CRSwNP patients than in the IT tissue of healthy individuals (HC-IT), suggesting their potential role in CRSwNP development (Fig. 2e). Consistent with these findings, using the HRA000772 dataset, we also detected higher proportions of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ cells in the CRSwNP with higher neutrophil numbers (neCRSwNP) than those with lower neutrophil numbers (eCRSwNP) (Supplementary Fig. 6b–d). We then conducted immunofluorescence analyses on NP tissues from 6 CRSwNP patients (CRS-NP) and IT tissues from 6 healthy controls (HC-IT), and the results revealed a preferential distribution of neutrophils (MPO+ cells) in the LY6D+ club cell-rich and IDO1+ fibroblast-rich regions (Fig. 2f, g), supporting their ability to recruit neutrophils in an inflammatory milieu in CRSwNP. These results collectively support that LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts facilitate neutrophil recruitment in CRSwNP.
LY6D+ club cells drive IL-1 signaling-mediated neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP
We further compared the proportions of LY6D+ club cells across anatomical regions. An elevated proportion of LY6D+ club cells within the total epithelial cell population was noted in CRS-ITs compared to HC-ITs, and in NP tissues compared to adjacent MT tissues (Fig. 3a). We then performed immunofluorescence analyses to evaluate the distribution of LY6D+ club cells in different tissues. Immunostaining detected only a few LY6D+ cells in normal IT tissues, but more LY6D+ cells in NP tissues, reflecting the preferential induction of LY6D+ club cells in an inflammatory milieu (Fig. 3b). A higher expression of S100A8 was also detected in the epithelium of NP tissues, further suggesting the neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP36 (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 6e). LY6D+ club cells were highly conserved across three anatomical regions as indicated in the fate decision tree, and PITX1 ranked as the top differentially expressed transcription factor determining LY6D+ club cell differentiation (Fig. 3d, e).
Previous studies have shown that the expression of S100A8 and S100A9 is elevated in nasal polyps as compared to control tissues37,38, and is associated with neutrophilic inflammation and CRS severity39. By exhibiting epithelial cell subset marker gene expression via heatmap, we observed the upregulation of S100A8 in LY6D+ club cells (Fig. 3f). We next explored the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in LY6D+ club cells as compared to other epithelial cells (Fig. 3g). In addition to LY6D and S100A8, S100A9 was also significantly upregulated in LY6D+ club cells (Fig. 3g). UMAP showed that LY6D+ club cells were the main cell source of S100A8 and S100A9 in the epithelium that may promote neutrophil chemotaxis in CRSwNP36 (Fig. 3g, h). The high expression of EREG and AREG in LY6D+ club cells indicated their involvement in eosinophil reprogramming and goblet metaplasia in response to inflammation40,41 (Fig. 3h).
Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the transcriptome of LY6D+ club cells was enriched in genes induced by IL-1 signaling (Fig. 3i). The RNA velocity profile of total club cells indicated that LY6D+ club cells originated from resident club cells, suggesting that some club cells in the face of upregulated IL-1 signaling progressively acquired LY6D+ club cell identity in the mucosal epithelium in CRSwNP patients (Fig. 3j). The expression of several key functional genes and transcription factors upregulated during the maturation process of LY6D+ club cells was presented in the heatmap (Fig. 3k). IL1RN was inferred by RNA velocity, iteratively indicating that IL-1 signaling participates in the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells (Fig. 3k). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that genes involved in neutrophil degranulation were also enriched in LY6D+ club cells, reflecting the regulation of neutrophil recruitment by LY6D+ club cells (Fig. 3i). Taken together, these findings underscore the role of LY6D+ club cells in IL-1 signaling-mediated neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP.
IDO1+ fibroblasts secrete chemokines that facilitate neutrophil recruitment in CRSwNP
To identify the stromal cell subsets responsible for inflammation in CRSwNP, we subclustered the stromal cell compartment into 27 clusters and annotated them into 15 distinct cell subpopulations (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b and Fig. 1g). Endothelial cells, pericytes and smooth muscle cells did not show much variation in the proportions of cell subsets across different anatomical regions except for an increased proportion of arterial endothelial cells and decreased proportion of lymphatic endothelial cells in CRS-related tissues as compared to those in HC-ITs, suggesting weakened lymphatic infiltration but enhanced angiogenesis in inflammatory tissues (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 7c–f). Fibroblast subsets exhibited substantial disparities in cellular proportions within the stromal cell compartment. The proportions of IDO1+ and OXTR+ fibroblasts were markedly higher in NPs than in other tissues (Fig. 4a).
To better characterize the functionality of the fibroblast subsets, we proceeded to construct a transcription factor fate decision tree for different cell subsets within the stromal cell compartment. Six out of the seven distinct fibroblast subsets were categorized into two main modules (Fig. 4b, c). We noticed that module 1 comprised fibroblasts that exerted pro-inflammatory effects by enhanced production of certain chemokines, such as CXCL1 and CXCL8, while module 2 encompassed fibroblasts that mainly reside in the adventitia and are essential for regulating the integrity and function of the vessel structure42–44. The fibroblast clusters were displayed according to different anatomical regions (Fig. 4d). Within the cell clusters in module 1, IDO1+ and OXTR+ fibroblasts were enriched in inflammatory tissues, mostly in NPs, and they were barely detected in healthy tissues (Fig. 4d).
Considering the potent interaction detected between IDO1+ fibroblasts and neutrophils, we explored the gene expression patterns of different stromal cell subsets. The transcriptome of IDO1+ fibroblasts was enriched in chemokines (CXCL1/2/3/8) that are relevant to neutrophilic inflammation (Fig. 4e, f). We subsequently conducted pathway enrichment analysis on the fibroblast subsets within module 1, whose gene expression pattern was associated with inflammatory responses, to scrutinize the regulatory pathways in which IDO1+ fibroblasts are implicated (Fig. 4g). Interestingly, both the IL-1 signaling pathway and the NF-κB signaling were enriched in IDO1+ fibroblasts, indicating the upstream regulation of IDO1+ fibroblasts by IL-1 signaling in inflammation development. The high expression of MMP3 and LIF in IDO1+ fibroblasts also indicated the regulation of IDO1+ fibroblasts by IL-1 signaling45,46 (Fig. 4f). Immunofluorescence staining revealed increased CXCL8 protein level and a greater number of IDO1+ fibroblasts (IDO1+ COL1A2+ cells) in CRS-NP samples as compared to HC-IT samples (Fig. 4h). Together, these findings elucidate IL-1 signaling as a common pathway inducing transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts to facilitate neutrophil recruitment in CRSwNP.
IL-1β−induced transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts promotes neutrophil recruitment
IL-1 signaling can be activated by the interaction between IL-1β and IL-1 receptor (IL-1R), leading to various immune responses including neutrophilic inflammation47. Here we deployed recombinant IL-1β on air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures generated from primary human nasal epithelial cells (HNEs) (Supplementary Fig. 8a). Bulk RNA-seq data revealed that the addition of IL-1β elicited the LY6D+ club cell state of ALI-cultured HNEs, as IL-1β-stimulated ALI-cultured HNEs highly expressed genes that were also upregulated in LY6D+ club cells detected by scRNA-seq, such as LY6D, SPRR2F, S100A9, and LYPD3 (Fig. 5a–c). Immunofluorescence staining of ALI-cultured HNEs revealed the colocalization and elevation of LY6D and S100A8 upon IL-1β stimulation (Fig. 5d). These results suggested that IL-1β induced transdifferentiation of LY6D+ cells in vitro. ELISA detected the increased secretion of S100A8/A9 protein from ALI-cultured HNEs upon IL-1β stimulation (Fig. 5e). Considering the ability of S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/A9 to promote neutrophil activation, chemotaxis and adhesion, we performed a chemotaxis assay to determine whether the secretion of S100A8/A9 contributes to IL-1β-mediated neutrophil recruitment36. The results showed that the media from ALI-cultured HNEs stimulated with IL-1β exhibited a stronger neutrophil chemotactic capacity compared to the control media. However, the application of a neutralizing antibody (anti-S100A8/A9 antibody) significantly reduced the neutrophil chemotactic capacity of the conditioned media. (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 8b).
To explore the effect of IL-1β on the induction of fibroblasts, we treated cultured primary fibroblasts isolated from IT tissues and NPs with IL-1β and performed bulk RNA sequencing. Bulk RNA sequencing results revealed high expression of genes encoding neutrophil chemoattractants (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL6, and CXCL8) in fibroblasts upon IL-1β stimulation (Fig. 5g). These genes were also upregulated in IDO1+ fibroblasts according to scRNA-seq analysis, suggesting that the primary fibroblasts acquire the identity of IDO1+ fibroblasts upon IL-1β stimulation. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that IL-1β was capable of activating fibroblasts and inducing the expression of CXCL8 and IDO1 in both IT-derived and NP-derived fibroblasts (Fig. 5h, i). In line with the results of bulk RNA sequencing, ELISA showed an increase in CXCL8 secretion in fibroblasts treated with IL-1β compared to those treated with PBS (Fig. 5j). As expected, culture media from IL-1β-exposed human nasal primary fibroblasts resulted in an increase in the transmigration of purified blood neutrophils compared with media of normal fibroblasts or fresh media mixed with IL-1β, whereas the application of a neutralizing antibody (anti-CXCL8 antibody) significantly reduced the neutrophil chemotactic capacity of the conditioned media (Fig. 5k). Therefore, we reason that IL-1β induces both epithelial cells and fibroblasts to promote the recruitment of neutrophils to the sites of inflammation in CRSwNP.
IL-1R antagonist impedes the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts and mitigates inflammation in vivo
IL-1β is associated with neutrophilic airway inflammation48. Here we revealed increased IL-1β level in CRS-NP compared with that in HC-IT (Fig. 6a), most of which was expressed in MNP/DCs (Fig. 6b–d). The proportion of monocytes was greater in NP tissues than in other tissues, explaining an increase in IL-1β in the inflammatory mucosa (Fig. 6e). IL-1β is correlated with neutrophilic inflammation in CRS, which is frequently associated with worse disease outcomes6. However, whether therapy targeting IL-1β mitigates neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP is unknown.
To explore the effect of IL-1β inhibition on neutrophilic CRSwNP, we established a mouse model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neutrophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (NCRS) with nasal polyps49, and then treated the model mice with anakinra, a recombinant, nonglycosylated interleukin-1 receptor antagonist that has been employed as a therapeutic intervention for autoinflammatory diseases and hematological malignancies50,51 (Supplementary Fig. 8c). The total cell count in nasal lavage fluid (NLF) from mice serves as an indicator of inflammation severity52. Compared to the CRSwNP model mice, fewer cells were detected in the NLF from the anakinra-treated group, particularly a reduced number of neutrophils (Fig. 6f and Supplementary Fig. 8d). Since IL-8 is not expressed in mice, CXCL1 is considered as one of functional human IL-8 homologs in mice53. ELISA detected elevated secretion of CXCL1 and TNF in the NLF from NCRS mice, while the secretion of these factors approached normal levels in anakinra-treated NCRS mice (Fig. 6g). In NCRS mice, we observed the inflammatory features represented by increased inflammatory cell infiltration and mucosal hyperplasia with impaired mucosal integrity, which were alleviated in anakinra-treated NCRS mice (Fig. 6h). Immunochemistry staining detected increased neutrophil infiltration in NCRS mice, which was also improved in anakinra-treated NCRS mice (Fig. 6i). These findings reflected the substantial mitigation of inflammation by IL-1β blockade in NCRS mice.
Similar to the induction of human primary cells by IL-1β, we detected increased numbers of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts in the mucosa of NCRS mice as compared to those in control mice (Fig. 6j, k). We next investigated whether IL-1R antagonist affects the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts in NCRS mice. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that the numbers of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts declined in the mucosa of anakinra-treated NCRS mice, along with the reduction of neutrophil infiltration, as compared to untreated NCRS mice (Fig. 6j, k). These findings suggested that IL-1β suppression impedes the transdifferention of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts and mitigates neutrophilic inflammation, suggesting that targeting IL-1β is an effective intervention against neutrophil recruitment in CRSwNP.
Discussion
Here, we presented a detailed profile of the nasal mucosa of HC-ITs, CRS-ITs, CRS-MTs, and NPs from CRSwNP patients at the single-cell level. We identified LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts in the nasal mucosa that promote neutrophil recruitment in CRSwNP. We generated an integrated dataset built from our data and the normal nasal mucosa and nasal polyps from another CRSwNP scRNA-seq dataset (HRA000772)20. Comparison of proportions of different cell clusters also revealed a significant increase in LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts in NP tissues as compared to control tissues. LY6D+ club cells exert the pathogenic effects upon IL-1 signaling stimulation by secreting S100A8 and S100A9, two molecules possessing the ability to promote neutrophil chemotaxis36. In addition, IDO1+ fibroblasts induced by IL-1 signaling produce multiple chemokines that interact with receptors expressed in neutrophils and promote neutrophil recruitment. IL-1β, a key factor in the IL-1 signaling pathway, was demonstrated to be upregulated in NPs from CRSwNP patients. We found that IL-1β induces the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts from epithelial cells and fibroblasts, respectively. Increased numbers of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts were also observed in the NCRS mouse model. Administration of an IL-1β antagonist reduced the numbers of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts, and showed a promising effect on alleviating neutrophilic inflammation in NCRS mice (see the model in Supplementary Fig. 8e). This study revealed specific cell types and related mechanisms driving neutrophilic inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis, offering potential therapeutic targets for the disease. Therefore, based on these findings, targeting the transdifferentiation of specific cells provides a strategy for the clinical treatment of CRSwNP.
A previous study detected higher mRNA and protein levels of IL-1β in NPs than in uncinate tissues, inferior turbinates, and ethmoid sinus mucosal samples from control participants, as did an increased number of IL-1β+ cells in polyp tissue from neutrophilic CRSwNP patients54,55. However, the cell sources of IL-1β in the nasal mucosa are unclear. Here, we verified the upregulation of IL-1β in NP samples from CRSwNP patients and identified that the cell sources of IL-1β in CRSwNP were monocytes, macrophages, DCs, and neutrophils. Our results elucidated the role of IL-1β in determining the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts, both of which are enriched in NP tissues. Elevated expression of S100A8 and S100A9 has been observed in nasal polyps compared to control tissues9,37,38. Both proteins that induce neutrophil chemotaxis and adhesion36 are secreted by LY6D+ club cells in the epithelium from the nasal mucosa. Elevated levels of EGFR ligands have been detected in various airway disorders, such as CRS and COPD56,57. Our results also demonstrated increased expression of EREG and AREG in LY6D+ club cells, indicating the involvement of these cells in activating EGFR signaling and subsequently inducing mucus and inflammatory cytokine secretion from airway epithelial cells56,58. The functionality of LY6D+ club cells is multifaceted and deserves further exploration. Previous studies have shown that immune cells and stromal cells within the organs, including macrophages and fibroblasts, send coordinated signals that guide neutrophils to their final destination59,60. Our data uncovered an unreported mechanism underpinning neutrophil chemotaxis orchestrated by IDO1+ fibroblasts in CRSwNP. IDO1+ fibroblasts constitute the core cell subset that promotes neutrophil recruitment based on the strong interaction observed between these two-cell subsets in CRSwNP. IL-1β-induced IDO1+ fibroblasts release substantial quantities of chemokines (CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8) to promote neutrophil recruitment. Considering that both LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts are induced by IL-1β, future studies should examine whether other pro-inflammatory cytokines in the IL-1 signaling pathway, such as IL-1α, contribute to the transdifferentiation of the two-cell subsets.
It is well known that neutrophilia and eosinophilia are both present in most cases of CRS19. Activated neutrophils possess the capability to facilitate eosinophil transmigration and accumulation61. Studies have demonstrated the association of mixed eosinophilic-neutrophilic inflammation with hard-to-treat asthma or CRSwNP5,19,62. CRSwNP patients with a mixed pattern of inflammation typically experience more severe symptoms and often exhibit treatment resistance along with comorbidities. Asian CRSwNP patients with mixed inflammation also have a higher risk of recurrence63. Currently, multiple biologics have been approved or are undergoing clinical trials as therapeutics for CRS. Dupilumab (targeting IL-4Rα), omalizumab (targeting IgE), and mepolizumab (targeting IL-5) have been approved for CRSwNP treatment. Reslizumab (targeting IL-5) and benralizumab (targeting IL-5Rα) have been undergoing phase 2 and phase 3 trials, respectively64. However, these therapies primarily target eosinophilic and type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP. The mixed pattern of inflammation makes it difficult to effectively target specific inflammatory pathways, and addressing the neutrophilic component remains a challenge65. Given the unfavorable prognosis of CRSwNP with a mixed inflammatory pattern and the ineffectiveness of steroids on the neutrophil activation state in CRSwNP, the demand to develop effective strategies against neutrophilia in CRSwNP patients is imperative64. The study identifies LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts as key mediators of neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP via the IL-1 signaling pathway. IL-1β receptor antagonists hinder the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells from resident club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts from primary fibroblasts. Therefore, targeting the transdifferentiation of these specific cell subsets may provide a personalized therapeutic approach to mitigate adverse outcomes in CRSwNP. Strategies targeting IL-1β, such as anakinra, rilonacept, and canakinumab, are commonly used to block the effects of IL-1β, thereby reducing inflammation and related symptoms in conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, and other immune-mediated diseases66. In our investigation, we elucidated the impact of an IL-1β-targeted intervention on the transdifferentiation of LY6D+ club cells and IDO1+ fibroblasts, as well as neutrophil recruitment, in a murine model of neutrophilic CRSwNP. It emphasized the clinical significance of this pathway in managing CRSwNP. In summary, this research uncovers the key cellular players and signaling pathways underlying neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP, highlighting IL-1 as a potential therapeutic target and advancing our knowledge of the disease mechanisms. Additional research is needed to validate these findings in CRSwNP patients and explore their implications for treatment resistance and disease prognosis in CRSwNP.
Methods
Study participants
In total, 85 individuals aged between 18 and 70 years were recruited from the Department of Otolaryngology at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, including nasal chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps (CRSwNP) patients (n=47) and healthy controls (HCs) (n=38). This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (KYLL-202102-1061). All study participants provided written informed consent. The diagnosis of CRSwNP was based on the EPOS 2020 criteria67 and included confirmatory clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic criteria. HCs were patients with cerebral spinal fluid leak or nasal septum deviation. The nasal tissues, including nasal polyps, middle turbinates, and inferior turbinates, were collected during endoscopic sinus surgery. Participants who had an immunodeficiency disorder, fungal sinusitis, cystic fibrosis, or tumors were excluded from the study. No participants used systemic corticosteroids for at least 4 weeks before surgery. The detailed clinical characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
Preparation of single-cell suspensions
Nasal mucosa was freshly sampled from the middle turbinates (n=7), inferior turbinates (n=9), nasal polyps (n=15) of CRSwNP patients, and inferior turbinates (n=2) of patients with cerebral spinal fluid leak. The nasal biopsies were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 10010023, Thermo Fisher) to remove mucus and blood cells. Then, the nasal tissues were cut into approximately 0.5-mm3 pieces in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and then enzymatically digested with the Multi Tissue Dissociation Kit 2 (MACS# 130-110-203) at 37°C for 30min with agitation, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following cell dissociation, the resultant cell suspension was sequentially filtered through cell strainers with pore sizes of 70μm and 40µm (BD). Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged at 300×g for 10min. Subsequent to the removal of the supernatant, the cells forming the pellet were reconstituted in red blood cell lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher) and subjected to a 2-min incubation on ice to lyse the red blood cells. Following dual washes with PBS, the cellular pellets were resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.04% bovine serum albumin (A7906, Sigma–Aldrich).
Single-cell RNA library construction and sequencing
DNBelab C Series High-throughput Single-cell System (BGI-research) was utilized for scRNA-seq library preparation. Briefly, the single-cell suspensions underwent a series of processes to generate barcoded scRNA-seq libraries. These steps encompassed droplet encapsulation, emulsion breakage, collection of beads containing the captured mRNA, reverse transcription cDNA amplification, and subsequent purification. The cDNA was subjected to fragmentation into shorter segments spanning 250–400 base pairs. Following this, the construction of indexed sequencing libraries was achieved in accordance with the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Qualification was performed using the Qubit ssDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. Subsequent to library preparation, all the constructs underwent sequencing using the DIPSEQ T1 sequencing platform in the China National GeneBank via pair-end sequencing methodology. The sequencing reads contained 30-bp read 1 (including the 10-bp cell barcode 1, 10-bp cell barcode 2, and 10-bp unique molecular identifiers [UMI]), 100-bp read 2 for gene sequences, and 10-bp barcodes read for sample index. Next, processed reads were aligned to the GRCh38 reference genome using STAR (v2.5.3). The identification of valid cells was achieved through an automated process utilizing the “barcodeRanks” function from the DropletUtils tool. This function was employed to eliminate background beads and those with UMI counts falling below a predetermined threshold, using the UMI number distribution characteristic of each cell. Finally, we computed the gene expression profiles of individual cells and subsequently generated a matrix of genes by cells for each library by means of PISA.
Alignment, quantification, and quality control of single-cell RNA sequencing data
The droplet-based sequencing data were subjected to alignment and quantification through the utilization of CellRanger software (version 3.0.2, designed for 3′ chemistry), employing the GRCh38.p13 human reference genome. The Python package Scanpy (version 1.7.1)68 was employed to load the matrix containing cell-gene counts and to execute quality control procedures for both the newly generated dataset and the acquired datasets. For each sample, genes associated with mitochondria (indicated by gene symbols commencing with “MT-“) and ribosomal proteins (initiated by gene symbols commencing with “RP”) were eliminated from consideration. After that, cells possessing less than 2000 UMI counts and 250 detected genes were identified as empty droplets and subsequently excluded from the datasets. Finally, genes demonstrating expression in fewer than three cells were excluded from further analysis.
Doublet detection
In order to rule out doublets, we implemented the Scrublet software (version 0.2.3)69, which facilitated the identification of artifactual libraries originating from two or more cells within each scRNA-seq sample, comprising both the newly generated dataset and the compiled datasets. The doublet score for each individual single cell, along with the threshold determined from the bimodal distribution, was computed using the default parameters (sim_doublet_ratio=2.0; n_neighbors=None; expected_doublet_rate=0.1, stdev_doublet_rate=0.02). After that, a comprehensive assessment was conducted on the remaining cells and cell subsets to identify potential false negatives from the scrublet analysis. This evaluation was guided by the following sets of criteria: (1) cells with more than 8000 detected genes, (2) subsets that expressed marker genes from two distinct cell types, which are unlikely according to prior knowledge (i.e., CD3D for T cells and EPCAM for epithelial cells). Any cells or subsets identified as doublets were excluded from subsequent downstream analyses.
Graph subsetting and partitioning cells into distinct compartments
The downstream analysis included normalization (scanpy.pp.normalize_total method, target_sum=1e4), log-transformation (scanpy.pp.log1p method, default parameters), cell cycle score (scanpy.tl.score_genes_cell_cycle method), cell cycle genes defined in Tirosh et al.70, feature regress out (scanpy.pp.regress_out method, UMI counts, percentage of mitochondrial genes and cell cycle score were considered to be the source of unwanted variability and were regressed), feature scaling (scanpy.pp.scale method, max_value=10, zero_center=False), PCA (scanpy.tl.pca method, svd_solver=’arpack’), batch-balanced neighborhood graph building (scanpy.external.pp.bbknn method, n_pcs=20)71, leiden graph-based subseting (scanpy.tl.leiden method, Resolution=1.0)72, and UMAP visualization73 (scanpy.tl.umap method) performed using scanpy. The initial categorization of the subsets encompassed a division into six distinct compartments, achieved through the utilization of marker genes established in the existing literature in conjunction with genes exhibiting differential expression. (scanpy.tl.rank_gene_groups method, method=’Wilcoxon test’). Specifically, the epithelial compartment was annotated using a gene list (EPCAM, KRT8, KRT18, KRT19, PIGR), T and ILCs compartment (CD2, CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, TRAC, IL7R), B cell compartment (JCHAIN, CD79A, IGHA1, IGHA2, MZB1, SSR4), MNPs compartment (HLA-DRA, CST3, HLA-DPB1, CD74, HLA-DPA1, AIF1), Mast cell compartment (TPSAB1, CPA3, TPSB2, CD9, HPGDS, KIT), and Stromal cell compartment (IGFBP7, IFITM3, TCF7L1, COL1A2, COL3A1, GSN). Subsequently, the epithelial compartment was subjected to sorting for subsequent downstream analysis. Detailed methods and marker genes were included in Supplementary Data 1.
Transcription factor module analysis
The Python package pySCENIC workflow (version 0.11.0) with default settings was used to infer active TFs and their target genes in all human cells74,75. Specifically, the pipeline was executed in three steps. Initially, the single-cell gene expression matrix was filtered to eliminate genes whose expression was detected in fewer than ten total cells. The retained genes were subsequently employed to construct a gene-gene correlation matrix, which facilitated the identification of co-expression modules through the application of a regression per-target approach utilizing the GRNBoost2 algorithm. Subsequent to the initial step, each identified module was systematically refined based on a regulatory motif in close proximity to a transcription start site (TSS). The acquisition of cis-regulatory footprints was facilitated through the utilization of positional sequencing methodologies. The binding motifs of the TFs were then used to build an RCisTarget database. Modules were retained based on the enrichment of transcription factor (TF)-binding motifs among their respective target genes. In cases where target genes lacked direct TF-binding motifs, they were excluded from consideration. In the third phase, we assessed the influence of each regulon on individual single-cell transcriptomes through the utilization of the area under the curve (AUC) score, employing the AUCell algorithm as the evaluative metric. The scores pertaining to transcription factor motifs within gene promoters and regions surrounding the transcription start sites, specific to the hg38 human reference genome, were acquired from the RcisTarget database. Concurrently, the list of transcription factor-associated genes was obtained from the Humantfs database76.
Fate decision tree construction (regulon-based)
Dendrogram plots were generated for epithelial cells using the sc.pl.dendrogram method from the Scanpy package. These plots were generated based on the AUCell matrix comprising 608 regulons, aiming to visualize more nuanced alterations. We deciphered the diverging composite rules of a regulon-based dendrogram by testing each branching node for differential regulon importance. Thereafter, differential analysis of regulon expression was conducted for each node using the Wilcoxon test (implemented through the sc.tl.rank_gene_groups method with method=‘Wilcoxon test’), with the aim of deducing the sequence of regulon-driven propagation events. The hierarchical clustering (dendrogram tree) was generated at a single-cell level77.
Datasets integration
In this study, we utilized a previously published scRNA-seq dataset of CRSwNP20 (GSA: HRA000772), and integrated the neutrophils with the data of this study to investigate the expression of inflammatory factors in neutrophils in human nasal mucosal tissues. Specifically, we compared the downloaded fastq files with the barcodes-genes matrix utilizing Alevin-fry78. The matrix underwent initial quality control, doublet removal, and normalization, applied in accordance with the dataset from the previous section. The gene expression and cell annotation of the dataset were modeled using CellTypist79. Subsequently, the trained model was used to perform Label Transfer on the HRA000772 dataset. In particular, myeloid cells annotated by Label Transfer were manually reannotated based on marker genes, thereby identifying the neutrophils subset (FCGR3B+CXCR1+CXCR2+). The study also integrated the scRNA-seq data with the data of normal ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses (n=5) and nasal polyps (n=11) from the HRA000772 dataset for statistical analyses.
RNA velocity
Cells that met the quality control criteria were used to filter the loom file generated by the Velocyto python package based on the cell barcodes80. This package was used to conduct splicing analysis on the bam file in preparation for subsequent RNA velocity analysis. The filtered loom file served as an input within the Scanpy pipeline, implemented as part of the CellRank pipeline81. The loom file derived from Velocyto was harnessed to compute RNA velocities for each cell according to standard parameters for the software. CellRank generates both stochastic and dynamic models of RNA velocity, which were compared via the computation of a consistency score for each cell, employing each modeling approach, in accordance with the guidance provided by the authors. Pseudotime was subsequently calculated based on the outcomes of RNA velocity analysis, while latent time was deduced from the dynamic velocity results.
Gene set scoring and identification of significant changes
We scored the gene sets of all cells and subsets using the Scanpy python package (sc.tl.score_genes method, ctrl_size=len(genesets), gene_pool=None, n_bins=25, use_raw=None). The score was the average expression of a set of genes subtracted from the average expression of a reference set of genes. The reference set was randomly sampled from the gene_pool for each binned expression value. To prevent highly expressed genes from dominating a gene set score, we scaled each gene of the log2 (TP10K+1) expression matrix by its root mean squared expression across all cells. After obtaining the score-cell matrix of the signatures, differential signature analysis (sc.tl.rank_gene_groups method, method=’Wilcoxon test’) was implemented to identify significant changes among different nasal anatomical regions. All pathways included in gene set enrichment analysis (Fig. 3i, Fig. 4g, and Supplementary Fig. 7e, f) were obtained from Reactome82.
Cell-cell interaction and network representation analysis
To plot chemokine-chemokine receptor interaction networks, we employed the Networkx (version 2.5) (https://github.com/networkx/networkx), Community (version 1.0.0b1) and Pygraphviz (version 1.6) (https://github.com/pygraphviz/pygraphviz) python packages to construct a network defined using the count of interactions between cell subsets. The pipeline was implemented in three steps. First, the nodes with a degree of zero were eliminated. Second, any edges with a connection strength less than the average of all the edges were removed. Third, the sizes of the nodes were defined as the log2 (counts+1) of the cell subsets, and the network with the Kamada Kawai layout algorithm (networkx.kamada_kawai_layout method) was utilized to visualize the network. The thickness of the line connecting the two-cell subsets was directly proportional to the degree of interaction strength between them. The chemokines-chemokines receptor interaction data were obtained from IMEx Consortium83, IntAct84, InnateDB-All85, MINT86, and I2D87 database.
Estimation of neutrophil infiltration in CRSwNP
In this study, we applied the xCell algorithm to determine the immune cell subsets in the RNA-seq dataset (GSE179265). The xCell algorithm represents a gene signature-based approach derived from learning from numerous pure cell types originating from diverse sources. This method adeptly enables a cell type enumeration analysis using gene expression data, providing a comprehensive assessment of 64 immune and stromal cell types. This attribute endows it with a commendable capability to accurately depict the intricate landscape of cellular heterogeneity within tissue expression profiles88.
Animals
6-8 weeks-old female C57BL/6 mice (n=36) purchased from SPF Biotech were used in these experiments. The mice were maintained in individually ventilated cages in a specific pathogen-free facility under 12h light–dark cycles at 22–24°C and 50–60% humidity. The protocol for the animal studies was approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee of Shandong University Cheeloo College of Medicine (23086).
Neutrophilic CRSwNP mouse model and treatment with an IL-1R antagonist (Anakinra)
Mice were randomly divided into three groups consisting of 6 individuals each. The construction of the mouse model of CRSwNP with neutrophilia was carried out following a previously described protocol49. For the control group, 20µl of PBS was dropped into the nasal cavities three times a week for 3.5 consecutive months. Mice in the model groups received 10µg of LPS (from Escherichia coli; Sigma–Aldrich, Merck Millipore, Germany) in 20µl of PBS three times a week for 3.5 consecutive months. For the anakinra-treated group, starting on the 77th day, the mice were given 100µg of Anakinra (MedChemExpress, HY-108841, USA) in 20µl of PBS by intranasal instillation and 100µg of Anakinra in 200µl of PBS by intraperitoneal injection 30min after LPS stimulation for 2 weeks. For the following 2 weeks, only 100µg of Anakinra was intranasally administered in 20µl of PBS within 30min each after LPS stimulation. The animals were sacrificed 24h after the last nasal challenge. The graphic protocol is depicted in Supplementary Fig. 8c. NLF was collected immediately from the sacrificed mice by washing the nasal cavity with 1mL of ice-cold PBS three times.
Immunofluorescence staining
We removed the skin on the heads of the mice and then excised the mandibles. The heads of the mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for at least 24h and decalcified for 7 days. For human nasal tissues, biopsy samples were soaked in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24h. For both the murine and human studies, after dehydration and paraffin embedding, the tissue samples were cut into 4-µm-thick paraffin sections. The slides were incubated at 65°C for 1h, dewaxed, hydrated, and subsequently heated in antigen retrieval liquid for 15min in a microwave oven. After cooling to room temperature, the slides were permeated with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 for 20min. The slides were washed in PBS 3 times and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin at room temperature for 1h. After that, the slides were incubated with the primary antibody (see Supplementary Table 2 for a complete list and dilutions) overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber. The slides were gently washed with PBS 3 times, and incubated with a fluorescent secondary antibody at room temperature for 1h. After washing with PBS, the slides were stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Solarbio, C006, China) for 10min. After another washing step with PBS, the slides were cover-slipped with an anti-fade mounting medium (Solarbio, S2100, China)89. Image acquisition was performed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, VS200, Japan).
Multiplexed immunohistochemistry
Multiplexed immunohistochemistry (mIHC) assay was performed using the Opal 6-Plex Detection Kit (AKOYA #811001, USA) as described previously90. Briefly, after dewaxing and hydration, the slides were boiled in AR6 buffer in a microwave oven for 15min. The tissue sections on the slides were incubated with blocking buffer for 30min and then with primary antibody (see Supplementary Table 2 for a complete list and dilutions) for 2h at room temperature in a humidified chamber. Then the slides were washed with TBST twice and incubated with Opal polymer anti-rabbit/mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for 10min at room temperature. Then, 100–300µl of Opal Fluorophore working solution was added to each slide. After washing with TBST twice, the slides were incubated at room temperature for 10min. The previous steps were repeated as needed. DAPI working solution was applied on the slides for 10min at room temperature. As a final step, the slides were washed and cover-slipped with an anti-fade mounting medium. Image acquisition was performed using the TissueFAXS imaging system (TissueGnostics, Germany).
Isolation and culture of primary human nasal epithelial cells (HNEs)
Human nasal epithelial cells were scraped from patients’ nasal mucosa during endoscopic sinus surgery. The cells were placed in an Eppendorf tube containing 1ml of bronchial epithelial cell medium (BEpiCM) (ScienCell, 3211, USA) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% bronchial epithelial cell growth supplement immediately upon acquisition. Cells were seeded within 6h in six-well plates pre-coated with Collagen Type I (Corning, 354236, USA) and maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C containing 5% CO2. The media was changed every two days. When cells reached 90% confluence in the well, they were transferred to the upper chamber of polyester Transwell inserts (0.4µm, 0.33cm2, BIOFIL, TCS016012, China) pre-coated with Collagen Type I. After that, 1ml of BEpiCM was added into the lower chamber, and media was replaced every two days. At confluence, the media was replaced with differential media (BEpiCM: DMEM/F12=1:1) in the basal chamber and the apical surface was exposed to provide an air-liquid interface (ALI). Monolayers were grown at the ALI for an additional 21 days to promote differentiation into a nasal epithelium with basal, multiciliated, and secretory cells. On day 22, media containing PBS or recombinant IL-1β (10ng/ml) (Abbkine, PRP100051, USA) was added to the basal chambers for 3 days.
Isolation and culture of primary human nasal fibroblasts (HNFs)
The inferior turbinate or nasal polyp tissues were soaked in penicillin-streptomycin solution (Solarbio, P1400, China) for 3min and cut into small pieces. After digestion in Trypsin-EDTA solution (Macgene, CC017-500) for 10min, the tissues were put into cell culture flasks with DMEM media supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C containing 5% CO2, and the media was replaced every 2 days. The migrated cells were nasal mucosa-derived fibroblasts. When cells reached 90% confluence in the well, PBS or IL-1β (10ng/ml) was added into the wells, and the cells were cultured for 1 day.
Isolation of human peripheral blood neutrophils
Neutrophils were enriched from peripheral blood by means of Polymorphprep (Serumwerk Bernburg AG, 1895) density centrifugation. We carefully layered 5.0ml of anti-coagulated whole blood over 5.0ml of PolymorphPrep in a 15ml tube. The tubes were centrifuged at 500×g for 30min at 20°C. After centrifugation, two bands were visible, and the neutrophils were enriched in the lower band. The cells were aspirated to another clean tube and an equal volume of sterile normal saline solution was added. After incubating at room temperature for 10min, the tubes were put on a centrifuge at 500×g for 30min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 media supplemented with 1% FBS.
Neutrophil chemotaxis assay
For the cell migration assay, after resuspension in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 1% FBS, the neutrophils were seeded in the upper compartment of 24-transwell plates with 3-μm pores (Costar, 3415). Conditioned media from ALI-cultured HNEs or fibroblasts, in the presence or absence of IL-1β stimulation and neutralizing antibody blocking (see Supplementary Table 2 for a full list of antibodies and dilutions), was added into the lower chamber of 24-transwell plates. After 3h of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, the number of the migrated cells in the lower chamber was counted.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
ELISAs were performed using multiple ELISA kits (4A Biotech, CHE0011, CME0008, CME0004, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, the standards and samples were added to the antibody pre-coated 96-well ELISA plate, which was subsequently incubated at 37C for 2h. The liquid was removed, and the plate was washed 4 times with wash buffer. Then, an enzyme-linked antibody was applied to the plate, which was incubated at 37°C for 60min. After a washing step, the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex was applied to each well, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 30min. The plate was washed 4 times with wash buffer and the color developing reagent was added to each well of the plate and the plate was incubated at 37°C in darkness for 10–20min. The reaction was terminated by adding a stop solution and the optical density (OD) at 450nm was measured immediately using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher, Varioskan Flash, USA). Analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.
Cytospin and Wright–Giemsa staining
NLF was collected immediately from the sacrificed mice by washing the nasal cavity three times with 1mL of ice-cold PBS. The collected lavage fluid was centrifuged at 1200×g for 5min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and the precipitated cells were treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (Servicebio, G2015, China) for 5min. The precipitated cells were resuspended in 0.2mL of PBS and were counted using a cell counter (JIMBIO, China). NLF cell smears were prepared on cytospin slides and stained using the Wright–Giemsa staining kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beyotime, C0131, China). Briefly, Wright–Giemsa staining solution was added to the NLF cell smears and stained for 45min. Then, the smears were washed with distilled water and dried at room temperature. The images were acquired by a Nikon Eclipse Ni-U epi-fluorescent microscope.
Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded sections were incubated at 65°C for 1h. Dewaxing, hydration, and antigen repair were performed sequentially as previously described90. The endogenous peroxidase blocker was applied to the slides after they had cooled to room temperature. The slides were incubated for 20min at room temperature. The slides were then washed with PBS 3 times and incubated with the primary antibody (see Supplementary Table 2 for a complete list and dilutions) in a humidified chamber at 4°C overnight. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with a reaction-enhanced solution. Following another wash, the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody for 10min, and the color reaction was developed using 3,30-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) (ZSGB-Bio, PV-9000, China). The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Finally, the slides were dehydrated and mounted. The images were acquired using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus VS200, Japan).
Hematoxylin and eosin staining (HE staining)
HE staining was performed using the HE staining kit (Beyotime, C0105S, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Sections were dewaxed, hydrated and then washed with PBS. Then, the sections were incubated with hematoxylin for 10s and washed with distilled water for 10min. After that, the sections were differentiated with 1% hydrochloric ethanol for 20s. After a washing step with distilled water for 10min, the slides were stained with eosin for 1min. Following dehydration, clearing and mounting, the slides were ready for image acquisition under a microscope (Olympus VS200, Japan).
Statistics and reproducibility
No statistical analysis was performed to predetermine the sample size. The numbers of samples included in the analyses are listed throughout the figures. For the scRNA-seq data, statistical analyses and graphic production were performed using Python version 3.7.10. The experimental data are presented as mean±SEM or mean with 95% CI, as shown in the corresponding figure legends. Data distribution was assumed to be normal. In the quantitative statistical graph for all stained images, each data point represents the average result from at least three randomly selected fields of view within the same sample. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for the Radar plot, applying a two-sided hypothesis. One-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Welch ANOVA were used to compare multiple sets. Two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used for the comparisons between the two sets. Statistical analyses and graphic production were performed with GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171106, 82371120, and 81700890 to X.F.), Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province (tsqn202103166 to X.F.), and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022MH313 to P.W.).
Author contributions
X.F. and P.W. conceived and designed the research. X.X. and M.J. collected and processed the tissue to single-cell suspensions. Y.W. contributed to the methodology of the scRNA-seq data analysis. M.J. and P.W. performed analyses for bulk mRNA sequencing data on epithelial cells and fibroblasts. X.X., L.Q., S.G., and P.W. analyzed data and prepared figures. X.X., C.W., Y.Y., and W.L. performed or contributed to the experiments on primary cell culture, with help from X.Z., H.L., and F.L. C.L., X.M., and C.D. performed the animal experiments. X.F., M.J., P.Y., and X.L. designed clinical protocols, reviewed clinical histories, selected and recruited study participants, and coordinated patient care teams to acquire profiled tissues. X.F. conceptualized and coordinated the study. P.W. and X.X. wrote the manuscript. X.F., M.J., L.B., and W.Z. revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The scRNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under primary accession number GSE276503. The RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GSA database under primary accession numbers HRA008501 and HRA008509. The published scRNA-seq data reused in this study are available at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa-human/browse/HRA000772. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All the codes related to the analysis are publicly available at https://github.com/JohnWang1997/nasal_polyps_scRNA-seq.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Xinyu Xie, Pin Wang, Min Jin, Yue Wang.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-53307-0.
References
Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group
Citations & impact
This article has not been cited yet.
Impact metrics
Alternative metrics
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/169557533
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
The activation and function of IL-36γ in neutrophilic inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 141(5):1646-1658, 21 Dec 2017
Cited by: 52 articles | PMID: 29274415
Tc17/IL-17A Up-Regulated the Expression of MMP-9 via NF-κB Pathway in Nasal Epithelial Cells of Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis.
Front Immunol, 9:2121, 19 Sep 2018
Cited by: 24 articles | PMID: 30283454 | PMCID: PMC6156140
Role of interleukin-17A in the eosinophil accumulation and mucosal remodeling in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps associated with asthma.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 151(1):8-16, 06 Aug 2009
Cited by: 48 articles | PMID: 19672092
Increased SERPINB2 potentiates 15LO1 expression via STAT6 signalling in epithelial cells in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Clin Exp Allergy, 54(6):412-424, 19 Apr 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38639267
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) (1)
Grant ID: 82171106, 82371120, 81700890
Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province (1)
Grant ID: tsqn202103166