Starstriker7

Hi, I am sad to say that your GA Nomination, Kepler-9c has failed because of the following reasons:

1. It was not well-organized.
2. Its info was not quite provided in a variety.
3. The text should be a little more lucid.
4. And most important of all it's a small article. Provide more info in the article and the article will be all right.

Thanks for asking my suggestions. Thank you.Ankit Maity 07:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

As to the small article, remember that by the criteria we have to make it as broad as we can without going into detail that's too deep. For an object like Kepler-9c, I can't go into much detail because there simply isn't much about it. It is broad for its kind of article.

I could get another editor to help me fix the organization and clarity problems, though. It is a tad difficult for me to notice them myself.

For future reference, however, remember that these must go at the bottom of talk pages, not the top. :)

Anyways, thanks for your suggestions. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 15:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the mistake. I did too much work that day and I had a hurry. I agree that there is not much information about that anyway. But let a little time pass, everything will be okay by then.Ankit Maity 05:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.

It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:

• Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
• Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
• Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
• Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
• Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
• Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
• Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
• Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
• Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
• In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.

If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew ^talk at 03:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

You are the supervisor for it, i didnt mark it for anything, but just so you know there is not a single source about wither the place or the one notable resident. Suggest maybe adding some in, if you have a reply, please post to my talk page.

Thanks,

Teamtheo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teamtheo (talk • contribs) 19:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup. Note: this is the same message from last week, but you are receiving it because you have not removed your name from the list yet! Please do so if you still plan on participating. iMatthew ^talk at 22:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Starstriker7! This is the last message that will go out to remind you that in order to participate in the 2010 WikiCup, you MUST remove your name from this list! Again, the reason for this reconfirmation is to ensure you've looked over the updated point values (which were different at the time you signed up) and to ensure that you are still interested in competing! If you don't have time to participate or no longer wish to, ignore this message and leave your name on the list. All names on the list will be removed from the contestants list before the Cup starts. Cheers! iMatthew ^talk at 14:30, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Burlington Flats,. Since you had some involvement with the Burlington Flats, redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –Black Falcon ^(talk) 05:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Can you please check them up the metropolitan cities in Turkey? Because, some of of them includes very little information nevertheless their population and significantly. Thank you so much. Filibeli (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 11 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 12 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 13 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 14 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 15 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 16 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 21 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 22 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 23 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:30, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 24 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 25 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 26 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 27 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 28 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 31 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 35 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:NGC 36 galaxy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:FanFour2 newposter.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

As the "WikiProject Cities assessor" please have a look at what I just posted at Talk:Barnard, Vermont. Thank you. --Vsop.de (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I've read in the discussion page of Bilbao that you're the Wikiproject Cities assessor of that article. I don't know if you're still in that task (the message is over two years old), but if you are, and if you come back from your wikiholidays, I'd really like you to check the article and give me some advice, as I'm currently working on it, trying to get it to a FA status. Hope to hear from you! Fernando 15:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fernando (talk • contribs) Reply

Hello, Starstriker7! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:44, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Artists impression Kepler-9.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article Kepler-9 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kepler-9 for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your DYK comments. History2007 (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article Kepler-9b you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kepler-9b for things which need to be addressed. Jappalang (talk) 01:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 20 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-9c, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that exoplanet Kepler-9c has an orbit that decreases by 39 minutes every time it circles its star? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Reply

 

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 23:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 22 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-9b, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the exoplanet Kepler-9b's "year" becomes four minutes longer every time it completes an orbit around its star? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this contribution to Wikipedia SmartSE (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC) Reply

According to the New York state Assessment summary table, there are 43 cities in New York state with class=??? and importance = mid. Can you help with reducing that backlog of class ratings? Right now, I am working on Pennsylvania templates.--DThomsen8 (talk) 18:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Aruba at the 2008 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 0 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I have reviewed the article Kepler-11 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. The article is close to GA status, but needs a few changes and improvements. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 00:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Heya, I reviewed the article and put some notes on it's nomination talk page. When you feel you have accomplished those tasks just leave me a message, contact me with questions too. •Felix• ^T 00:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply