Ita140188

Dear Ita140188, I've noticed that you have contributed to the article on Hydrogen-powered aircraft and based on your credentials seem like a qualified person. I've recently created a page for the hydrogen aircraft company ZeroAvia. It will be great if you could help with additional contributions and page revision. Thank you! --Verbal.noun (talk) 19:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Verbal.noun: thank you for the comment! It is an interesting article. I will try to contribute when I have time. --Ita140188 (talk) 01:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tesla, Inc. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Greetings Ita140188, I have started a discussion on the SpaceX Starship talk page about reoganizing the prototype section. I would really appreciate your input. Please take a look and leave a note. Many thanks. JaredHWood💬 01:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Jared.h.wood: Thanks for the note, I will check it --Ita140188 (talk) 10:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ita140188. Thank you very much for your cleanup of Tesla, Inc.. Nicely done! On the Tesla Autopilot page, I see that in December, you added a tag "Cleanup reorganize: organization of sections is confusing and disorganized." I have cleaned up the functions section. What other cleanup do you recommend? ReferenceMan (talk) 02:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@ReferenceMan: Thank you! I think you did a great job at Tesla Autopilot by reorganizing everything into a table. My biggest problem with the organization was that section. Now it's much better, so I removed the tag. On a related note, I think we will soon need to split FSD into a new article. At that point, we can keep a summary of it in the Autopilot article under "Driving features". --Ita140188 (talk) 05:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Philosophy Tube on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I noticed your rigorous editing on Tesla, Inc. and I was wondering if you would be interested in assisting me with cleaning up History of Tesla, Inc.? As you must have apprehended already, it needs quite a bit of attention. Thanks. QRep2020 (talk) 06:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@QRep2020: thanks for the message. I will see if I can help later, but first I want to focus on the GAN on Tesla. But yes I agree, that article definitely needs some attention. --Ita140188 (talk) 13:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ita140188, could you help explain commons:Special:Diff/519510314? Is there a better way to keep images of the two Giga Press machines at Fremont grouped together? —Sladen (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Sladen: I removed the section because the parent section commons:Category:Giga Press was already a subsection of Tesla Factory. Now that presses are being installed in other factories, I think we can reinstate the categories --Ita140188 (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I did some serious work on Controversies and Product Issues sections of Tesla, Inc., but maybe do a read too. Also, I have a feeling the reviewer might have an issue with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla,_Inc.#Vehicle_sales because of that "deliveries" versus "sales" comment from earlier in the GA2. QRep2020 (talk) 06:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@QRep2020: Thank you for the support in this GAN! These days I am a bit busy, but as soon as I have time I will check all your changes and start replying on the more tricky comments in the review. --Ita140188 (talk) 06:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  An article that you have been involved in editing—100% renewable energy—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ciao @Ita140188: sei il primo connazionale che incontro nella community della Wikipedia in inglese. Fa piacere :)

Ho trovato il tuo nome quasi per caso esplorando la cronologia della voce Rete Ferroviaria Italiana. Stavo cercando qualcuno a cui rivolgermi per capire come procedere in merito a una questione delicata su cui non voglio intervenire perché sono in conflitto di interessi.

Di recente, la Corte di Cassazione si è espressa sull'incidente ferroviario di Viareggio, quindi sarebbe utile riportare nella voce gli ultimi sviluppi. Ho segnalato la cosa nella pagina di discussione relativa (qui) e qualora fosse possibile sarei felicissima di proporre alla community un testo. Al momento nessuno ha ancora risposto. Posso chiederti di dare un'occhiata? Mi faresti davvero una grande cortesia.

Grazie mille in anticipo :) Claudia Frattini (talk) 09:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Claudia Frattini: Ciao! Grazie del messaggio. Credo sia ok proporre una modifica nella talk page. Non ho familiarità con il disastro né con il processo, quindi non sono sicuro di poter contribuire direttamente. Se riesci a scrivere il testo da aggiungere, poi posso procedere ad aggiungerlo alla pagina dopo aver controllato le fonti. Le fonti dovrebbero essere da una terza parte (possibilmente non la sentenza della corte, che è difficile da interpretare, e sicuramente non un comunicato di FS), idealmente un giornale nazionale o simile, meglio se in inglese ma non necessario. --Ita140188 (talk) 11:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ciao @Ita140188:, grazie mille della disponibilità e dell’aiuto. I've written this message in English so that everyone can follow along with the conversation :)

Shortly, I will publish in the RFI talk page (here) an update proposal supported by third-party sources, as per your instructions. I will also add a ping so that you can receive the notification. Once it's up let me know what you think about it, I treasure your opinion :)

Grazie mille in anticipo Claudia Frattini (talk) 11:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Tesla, Inc. you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Tesla, Inc. for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 21:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Huh? Don't know what's gone on here. I passed the article and yet Legobot says it's failed. Any idea? Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Willbb234: Thank you very much for reviewing such as long article. It was a pleasure to improve the page together. I am not sure what happened with the GA bot, but the issue seems resolved now. I think the article still needs to be added to Wikipedia:Good articles in the appropriate section, per Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions#Passing. Thanks again! --Ita140188 (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Tesla, Inc. (estimated annual readership: 3,975,933) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Wretchskull (talk) 12:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Wretchskull: wow! Thank you! --Ita140188 (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for cleaning up my edits on Wind power in the United States. I see that you changed levelized cost of energy#Levelized_avoided_cost_of_energy|levelized avoided cost of energy to levelized cost of energy I'm surprised that this works, since the target is a section, not a page. But of course it does. What's the behavior? When WP doesn't find a page by that name, it looks for a section by that name, on any page? What if it finds more than one match? Leotohill (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Leotohill: there is no automatic process, I just created the page Levelized avoided cost of energy as a redirect to the section. In this way, if in the future we want to have Levelized avoided cost of energy as a separate page, the links already exist. Also, by linking to a unified page that redirects to the section, if we change the section name we only need to change the redirect, not all the links in the rest of the articles. --Ita140188 (talk) 01:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

got it. thanks. Leotohill (talk) 02:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milan Area C you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Milan Area C you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Milan Area C for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Milan Area C you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Milan Area C for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Could you not direct some information, to where the deleted parts have gone ?

now it looks more that you are only deleting

J.T.W.A.Cornelisse (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@J.T.W.A.Cornelisse: I replied in your talk page --Ita140188 (talk) 04:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply