Ita140188
 | I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to. |
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at User talk:El Wizardo on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Molten Salt Reactor - what happens to Xe and Kr?
You just deleted the best source to settle the question with a comment "youtube is not a reliable source".
Youtube is a video streaming service, not a source. The source is a Gordon McDowell video of Lars Jorgensen, giving a talk on their MSR design, in which he explains clearly what happens with these fission products. David MacQuigg 21:12, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
I see the problem is fixed. Thank you. David MacQuigg 04:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
"Producer–consumer problem" article quality standard, lead section rewrite
Hello Ita140188. I rewrote big parts of the producer-consumer problem article. This article has a lot of complexity. As a Master in Computer Science (exactly Diplom Informatiker - an older german title) I am very good in the history of computer science and can show with citations where the term "producer-consumer problem" originated. I can ensure that the source code in the article is very high standard. But I am not a writer. Can you please give me more detail about "quality standard" and "lead section rewrite"? AndreAdrian (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @AndreAdrian: The lead does not have enough context for someone not already familiar with the topic. The second paragraph starts with "The unbounded buffer case:". The first time someone reads this they will wonder "what is the buffer? What are we talking about here?" Technical words should be introduced before they are used whenever possible to avoid this. The next paragraph has "In section 4.1".. what does this mean? What is this referring to? This kind of writing makes it very difficult if not impossible to follow the text. The lead and the whole article is full of these problems and should be rewritten for clarity. --Ita140188 (talk) 13:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
The article SpaceX you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SpaceX for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jazzstinger -- Jazzstinger (talk) 16:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Jazzstinger: Thank you for the notification! @CactiStaccingCrane and Ixtal: Thank you very much for the useful comments and for helping to make the article better! --Ita140188 (talk) 08:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Congratulations :) — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 08:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Congrats to you as well! Sorry for delaying the review for so long. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Milan Metro left/Line 5
Template:S-line/Milan Metro left/Line 5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/Milan Metro right/Line 5
Template:S-line/Milan Metro right/Line 5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Price of oil
I saw that you were helping with the general article.
Could you please keep in mind we have World oil market chronology from 2003 for more detailed information? I might be that people are adding too much to the main article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)