Ita140188

ti segnalo che per la CNNC sono partiti tutti e due i reattori, mentre per WNA ne hanno iniziato solo uno, il secondo fra 10 mesi. --Dwalin (talk) 13:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Grazie! Ma dove le trovi queste info in Cinese?? --Ita140188 (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

è il sito ufficiale della CNNC. la versione inglese ha poco, ma se switci a quella cinese ci sono molte più info. poi se google translate non batte i ciocchi.......--Dwalin (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

hanno aggiornato il PRIS, solo che il reattore ha la stessa potenza degli altri 2 anche se è hualong one. aspetto un secondo per capire meglio la questione prima di modificare, intanto ti avvertivo--Dwalin (talk) 12:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

comparso sul PRIS, come il secondo e c'è anche xiapu-1. manca ancora il 2 e sapere praticamente tutto dei CAP1400, ma son comparsi. la data di inizio lavori è il 2013. --Dwalin (talk) 23:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

aggiornati i CAP, manca sempre Xiapu 2. --Dwalin (talk) 12:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Dwalin: Grazie! Ho aggiornato la lista di reattori. --Ita140188 (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ti aggiorno e non lo faccio io così ci sono meno probabilità di dimenticanze varie nella compilazione, e così sai anche tu tutti gli aggiornamenti del caso e ne tieni memoria personale. --Dwalin (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ho trovato questo articolo. tu sai qualcosa in merito?--Dwalin (talk) 16:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, ma mi sembra speculazione mediatica, in ogni caso se la Cina volesse aumentare il proprio arsenale un modo lo trova, non credo sia un problema connesso specificamente con questa tecnologia. --Ita140188 (talk) 02:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

quello ovvio, ma è come sempre...mettere mezze cose vere e mezze bugie. non hanno messo i due xiapu, ma il riprocessamento del combustibile di xiapu non lo fai in un impianto militare, e quelli civili non esistono ancora. mentre per la normativa che impone di dire i tuoi stock di plutonio militare è la prima volta che ne sento parlare. --Dwalin (talk) 10:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ciapa!--Dwalin (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

concernente questo.......tu hai capito come mai la cina ultimamente è restia ad aggiornare il PRIS? mancano 4 reattori (questi 2 + xiapu 2 + shidaoguan). --Dwalin (talk) 07:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Dwalin: Mah.. non ne ho idea. Non so neanche come funziona praticamente l'aggiornamento del database. Tu sai qualcosa a proposito? --Ita140188 (talk) 03:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

immagino che sia obbligatorio all'accensione e facoltativo alla costruzione, dato che all'accensione tutto diviene automaticamente rifiuto. ma sono mere supposizioni, nulla di più. --Dwalin (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

qui c'è scritto che i lavori sono iniziati il 19 maggio. anche qui dicevano 19 maggio. invece oggi dicono 28 luglio. --Dwalin (talk) 15:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Climate change on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for adding the source for the employees at Tilburg factory. I am not skilled enough to do that yet. I have another reference for the Semi production at Giga Nevada, if you want, please feel free to add it: https://insideevs.com/news/498003/tesla-semi-production-nevada-assembly-line/ Greetings from Germany, happy Easter and stay healthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasmopaya (talk • contribs) 19:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Kasmopaya: Thank you! You can check Help:Footnotes for more info on how to add citations yourself ;) --Ita140188 (talk) 04:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nuclear power you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I took {{overly detailed}} off after trimming and condensing the material contained, all of which struck me as reasonably significant and worthy of some kind of mention. The sole borderline one would be the unintentional power excess. Anyway, since you added th tag and noted you felt (multiple?) incidents should go, would you mind having a glance and seeing what you think? 92.24.246.11 (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Actually, on further thought I've removed the power increase. 92.24.246.11 (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, it's much better now. --Ita140188 (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking a look :) 92.24.246.11 (talk) 13:25, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Nuclear power you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nuclear power for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SpaceX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 64.121.103.144 -- 64.121.103.144 (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article SpaceX you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:SpaceX for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 13:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Nuclear power you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Nuclear power for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JackFromReedsburg -- JackFromReedsburg (talk) 01:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

	The Half Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Nuclear Power (estimated annual readership: 500,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for improving this vital article! – Reidgreg (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! --Ita140188 (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ciao @Ita140188: dato che sei stato così gentile la scorsa volta ho pensato di "approfittarne" di nuovo :)

Sempre a proposito dell'incidente ferroviario di Viareggio, ho trovato un'imprecisione che andrebbe corretta nella voce Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane. Si fa riferimento alla società come condannata durante il processo, ma come emerge anche dalla fonte presente FS Italiane è stata assolta già in primo grado. Ho proposto la modifica in discussione (qui), ma non avendo ancora ricevuto alcuna risposta mi chiedevo se potessi nuovamente aiutarmi. Grazie mille in anticipo :) --Claudia Frattini (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Claudia Frattini: Grazie per il messaggio. Purtroppo questi giorni non ho molto tempo per Wikipedia. Appena trovo tempo controllo le fonti ed in caso modifico la pagina. --Ita140188 (talk) 09:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

The 465 EJ is difficult to understand, unless one shows how many of some fascility this corresponds to. this corresponds to 13k Hoover dams, based on some simple math. The reason it is difficult to decarbonize is problem size is large, and most efforts are small relative to problem size. I think the following is a good way to explain this yet am open to other ways to explain this:

The 465 EJ/yr refers to heat energy. If one converts heat to electricity via a 35% efficient turbine, for example, then this would correspond to 45,200 TWh/yr of electricity. To get a sense of size, one can divide this by energy generated from a known facility to see how many one would need to replace fossil fuels. For example, Hoover Dam generated 3.3 TWh in 2020; therefore, one would need 13,700 of these dams get 45K TWh (45,200/3.3).[1] Many decarbonisation initiatives are small relative to global energy consumption, which is perhaps the greatest challenge of fossil fuel phase-out.

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abortion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Solar power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, since you have written many Elon Musk's related topic, I think you might like reviewing SpaceX Starship for coverage and compehensiveness. This article is currently a  , and currently undergoing a   review, so if you can provide any comment to the normination, I would be extremely elated! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Braunschweig on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:DRASTIC on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wind power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Golden Urn on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply