Hispalois

Yippee!!! We have a new member in our WikiProject! Welcome aboard! --HappyCamper 14:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I noted your comment in your edit to Polybutadiene. Polybutadiene is definitely an elastomer or a rubber. It certainly does not resemble many of the other plastics listed. However, "plastic" is not well defined in the first place. A better term would be "polymer" but that wikipedia article does not focus on hydrocarbon based synthetic polymers. That said, how does polybutadiene not fit the definition of Plastic?

Plastic covers a range of synthetic or semisynthetic polymerization products. They are composed of organic condensation or addition polymers and may contain other substances to improve performance or economics. There are few natural polymers generally considered to be "plastics". Plastics can be formed into objects or films or fibers. Their name is derived from the fact that many are malleable, having the property of plasticity. Plastics are designed with immense variation in properties such as heat tolerance, hardness, resiliency and many others. Combined with this adaptability, the general uniformity of composition and light weight of plastics ensures their use in almost all industrial segments.

--Rifleman 82 14:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Hispalois. I've copied our discussion to Talk:Plastic so that other contributors may participate in this discussion. Hopefully we can come up with more ideas and reach a consensus on how to classify polymers. --Rifleman 82 22:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Lawrence Kemys, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Guiana and Santo Tomé (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 22:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dear WikiProject Spain member,

There is currently a proposal to ban articles concerning a large area of southern Andalusia from appearing on the Main Page of Wikipedia in the Did you know? section. This would affect a significant number of articles within the scope of WikiProject Spain. If you have a view on this proposal, please see Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs‎#Proposal for one-year moratorium on Gibraltarpedia DYKs. In addition, you may have a view on an alternative proposal to lift restrictions on Gibraltar-related articles on DYK - please see Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs#Proposal for lifting the restrictions on Gibraltar-related DYKs. Prioryman (talk) 14:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

¡Muchas gracias, compañero! Un abrazo, --Lucien leGrey (m•en•es) 22:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

You made this edit [1]. Please read WP:TERRORIST. Philip Trueman (talk) 09:26, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

(Reply to message on my talk page) Yes, pretty much. You can use the 't' word if you provide a reliable source, of course, but even so it may be better to avoid it - even if it's an established fact it can give the impression that the article isn't written from a neutral point of view. Philip Trueman (talk) 05:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz gmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

 

sign up for monthly delivery

 

 

Feature – Ebola articles

 

During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

Just some of our over 60 translations:

• Xhosa
• Northern Sotho
• Zulu
• Tsonga
• Venda
• Hausa
• Igbo
• Yoruba
• Kinyarwanda
• Swahili
• Tigrinya

New roles and guides!

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!

New sign up page!

We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!

Style guides for translations

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.

Some more stats

• In July, 18 full article translations went live (WP:RTT), and an additional 6 simplified versions went live (WP:RTTS)!
• We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! (Find them here old sign up page)
• We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap
• New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!

Further reading

• Translators Without Borders
• Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

-- CFCF 🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited César Vidal Manzanares, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Gibson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017

• New and expanded research accounts
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
• Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

• Library card
• User Group update
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
• Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

• User Group update
• Global branches update
  • Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
• Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
• Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

• OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
• User Group update
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018

• #1Lib1Ref
• User Group update
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
• Bytes in brief

Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018

• #1Lib1Ref
• New collections
  • Alexander Street (expansion)
  • Cambridge University Press (expansion)
• User Group
• Global branches update
  • Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
• Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018

• #1Bib1Ref
• New partners
  • Rock's Backpages
  • Invaluable
  • Termsoup
• User Group update
• Global branches update
  • Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
• Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018

• New partners
  • Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
• Wikimania
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

• Library Card translation
• Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

• OAWiki
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

• #1Lib1Ref
• New and expanded partners
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019

• #1Lib1Ref
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019

• Partnerships
• #1Lib1Ref
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Beethoven (talk) 18:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RexxS (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hispalois (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is the first time I have been blocked in Wikipedia and therefore I do not know the procedures very well. Apologies for any mistake I may be making in this request. I am surprised at having been blocked * without any previous warning by an admin or in general by any editor on my talk page * without having had the possibility to participate in the discussion at the admins’ noticeboard I acknowledge I am in disagreement with another editor about one specific article. I have taken the disagreement to the Talk page in hopes of reaching a consensus. I will be happy to follow the indications of any admin about how to behave regarding this disagreement and will refrain from editing the article in question until then. Hispalois (talk) 15:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

Assurances of future conduct per this discussion. --RexxS (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Would you agree to a ban from editing the Catalans article and editing about the Catalan ethnicity broadly construed? PhilKnight (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree to a temporary ban but if you think a ban forever is necessary, I guess I am not in a position to reject the offer either. Thanks. --Hispalois (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I would have no objection to an unblock on those terms.

Hispalois, I hope you can appreciate my concern over edits which, for example, removed the sourced words "ethnic group" something like seven times since last September. If you are unblocked, please continue to contribute in other topic areas and take the opportunity to demonstrate how productively you can edit. --RexxS (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@RexxS: Might I suggest a topic ban on Catalan and Catalan ethnicity and ethnicity/"ethnic group", broadly construed, to be reviewed at WP:AN after six months of editing constructively?-- Deepfriedokra 09:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Deepfriedokra: As I'm sure you're aware, an admin cannot impose a topic ban on their own discretion in areas not covered by discretionary sanctions, which do not cover the article in question. Otherwise that would have been my preferred option in response to the ANI report. Nevertheless, if Hispalois accepts PhilKnight's binding terms for an unblock as a reasonable way to resume editing in other areas for the time being, we could arrive at the point you suggest by that route. What do you think, Phil? --RexxS (talk) 11:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Exactly. As a condition of being unblocked. Though I think they already agreed in principle.-- Deepfriedokra 14:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to offer a potential endpoint via an appeal at AN-- Deepfriedokra 14:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hopefully Hispalois can accept the version outlined by Deepfriedokra, that is a topic ban on Catalan and Catalan ethnicity and ethnicity/"ethnic group", broadly construed, to be reviewed at WP:AN after six months of editing constructively. PhilKnight (talk) 20:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I do not object to the 6-month ban on Catalan ethnicity but I am afraid that ethnicity "broadly construed" encompasses a very diverse range of topics, so I risk editing a "forbidden" article inadvertently. Someone could argue for example that the ethnicity topic covers everything under Category:Ethnic groups, but that category happens to include articles like Taco Bell (a Mexican fast-food chain), Hobbit (a fictional race), Joe Lieberman (categorized as Jewish US senator) or the Sicilian revolution of 1848. Could we please keep it simple and limit the ban to the article Catalans and those that are directly related to Catalan ethnicity (examples appreciated)? --Hispalois (talk) 22:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello? @PhilKnight: @RexxS: @Deepfriedokra: --Hispalois (talk) 08:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I think it should apply to human ethnicities and changing ethnic groups or removing ethnic groups from articles. Or the word "ethnic group". Unless you disruptively changed ethnic groups of fictional races?-- Deepfriedokra 10:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

On the other hand, I don't see Taco Bell or Joe Lieberman with Cat:ethnic groups. Needs more coffee. Let's go back to the original disruptive behavior. What did that consist of?-- Deepfriedokra 10:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Deepfriedokra for answering my ping. I am not sure if the question "What did that consist of?" is for me. In case it is, I will sum it up in a nutshell:

I got into a disagreement with another user about the lead section of the article Catalans. I opened a discussion in the Talk page, where we managed to reach a partial consensus but for two specific issues. Unfortunately, there was no third opinion. On 24 August, the other user removed the {{disputed}} template I had inserted. That pissed me off and I reverted him, inadvertently also removing some improvements he had done to a reference. He/She reverted me, I reverted him again and he reported me to the admins' noticeboard. His arguments were heard and I was blocked before even knowing I had been reported.

If the question was not for me, and this is not the place to retell the story, please accept my apologies.--Hispalois (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@PhilKnight: @RexxS: @Deepfriedokra: Apologies for pinging everyone again. I have been blocked project-wide for 11 days now and the discussion here has idled. --Hispalois (talk) 15:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Do you agree to the topic ban unblock condition--Catalan and Catalan ethnicity broadly, and changing ethnicity/"ethnic group" in articles? To be reviewed at WP:AN after six months of editing constructively?-- Deepfriedokra 15:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I agree to the topic ban as defined: Catalan and Catalan ethnicity broadly, and changing ethnicity/"ethnic group" in articles. --Hispalois (talk) 15:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've unblocked you given your assurances of future conduct per this discussion. --RexxS (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019

• Wikimania
• We're building something great, but..
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• A Wikibrarian's story
• Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019

• #1Lib1Ref January 2020
• #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019

• #1Lib1Ref
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply