א. א. אינסטלציה

Hello, א. א. אינסטלציה, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

אוקיי, תודה!

I assume the point you are making is that using Rafe is simply a placeholder/alternative for the more precise use of the breve or caron that you are advocating. (I can't tell which of those it is; my eyesight isn't what it used to be.) Perhaps—but I think people are much more accustomed to seeing either a rafe or a geresh for that purpose in Hebrew-alphabet languages. And rafe is the standard used in Ladino Wikipedia. This is why I would much rather you leave these alone here—and certainly to leave them alone on Ladino Wikipedia. Thank you. StevenJ81 (talk) (sysop at Ladino Wikipedia) 13:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

In Ladino we use ◌ﬞ, in Unicode it is called “hebrew point judeo-spanish varika”, you can look even here in the newspaper El Tiempo איל טײמפו. http://jpress.org.il/Olive/APA/NLI/Print.Page.aspx?href=TIEMPO%2F1896%2F01%2F02&page_num=1&pub_name=%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9C%20%D7%98%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9E%D7%A4%D7%95&page_label=1&issue_date=Thursday%2C%20January%2002%2C%201896&section=Front%20page

In the square script there's a geresh ׳ but in the rash"i script part you can see the ◌ﬞ sign. The dot above ◌ׄ is less common and to be accurate it is not a Raphe, after all the Raphe changes ג (g) into גֿ (gh, like Arabic غ) while גﬞ or גׄ is j like in English joy (Arabic ج and Turkish Ç) or some times ch (Persian چ and Turkish C) א. א. אינסטלציה (talk) 14:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you are a competent Judeo-Spanish speaker, we could really use some contributors at Ladino Wikipedia. I'd like to encourage you to contribute there.

• Most pages are in Latin-script versions, and that's fine. We support several different options.
• We'd love more pages in Hebrew-script. (For now, don't start playing with rafes or gereshes there. In the longer term I'm not opposed. But if we make a community decision to change that, I'm going to find someone with a bot that can do it.)

  The default direction of the wiki is LTR. If you want to start writing pages in Hebrew script, I'll show you how to use class="mw-content-rtl" on those pages, if you don't know already.

Thanks in advance! StevenJ81 (talk) 14:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC

ƕy did you changed this??? There is a d (ܕ) in ܥܕܬܐ! א. א. אינסטלציה (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Talk:Marwan Barghouti, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You may not offer your personal opinions on living people. This is not a forum website. Thank you. nableezy - 20:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC) 20:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why? 

It was only in the talk, not even in the page itself! א. א. אינסטלציה (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

You may not use any page on Wikipedia, talk page, user talk page, project space, whatever, to make such statements about living people absent rock solid sources that back them up as fact. That is why. Please read WP:BLP, paying close attention to where it says This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages, including talk pages. nableezy - 02:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me?! Do you want sources? No problem I will add. א. א. אינסטלציה (talk) 08:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you do not self-revert your latest addition I will be reporting you to WP:AE. The Israeli MFA is an excellent source for the views of the Israeli government, which you'll note we say on the article considers him a terrorist. They are not however a source to call a living person a terrorist as you are. Kindly revert your edit and cease violating WP:BLP. nableezy - 16:23, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why? I do not understand! I have put sources and all! א. א. אינסטלציה (talk) 16:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

You have not put any reliable sources that Barghouti is a terrorist, you have put websites that express the view that he is according to Israel. A Wikipedia talk page is not the place to express your personal opinions, and contentious material about living people require reliable sources of fact. Kindly remove the edit and read WP:BLP and WP:SOAP. Wikipedia is not a forum for you to spread your personal opinions. I'm also going to be leaving you the arbitration notice on the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area. nableezy - 16:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

What sources are good amd reliable? Where is the list of terrorist that all agree on? א. א. אינסטלציה (talk) 16:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply