Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Converting Equipment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Converting Equipment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no significance except some purely routine minor articles in trade journals presumably based on press releases DGG ( talk ) 02:11, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 02:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Of the offered references, the April 2012 Packprint World article is probably most substantial, but is just quoting someone from this firm among several. Multiple searches are just turning up PR-based mention in trade press; nothing to indicate that the firm meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 09:57, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.