Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Andrews (Activist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 13:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Andrews (Activist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It appears to be a clear case of one event - Andrews only seems to have had any real coverage as a result of a comment he made in a blog post in 2009. I had a dig around, and I found instances where he made a comment to the press in regard to his role as President of student groups, but not sufficient non-trivial coverage to pass the notability requirements. Bilby (talk) 12:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

strong delete none of his positions confer notability. Is blogger really his full time occupation? Being a notable blogger usually means recognition by mainstream press. LibStar (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So does one punch the delete button extra vigorously to make it a "strong" deletion??? Carrite (talk) 02:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete That's not even a wp:BLP1E demonstrated. Neonchameleon (talk) 20:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Run of the mill fluffy puffy promo piece on behalf of an unelected politician. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)'[reply]
Delete per all. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 17:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.