Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim – Dawnguard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep.SK 1 as nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments.(non-admin closure)Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't have any importance but being DLC for a popular game Tractor Tyres (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 25. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 06:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Notability and WP:GNG is satisfied with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, already included in the article. Being DLC isn't a valid deletion argument and we do not measure "importance" this way. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:08, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it has been reviewed by several reliable sources anf so far the only rational for deletion is that it is DLC. Also, even if it was nof reviewed the first step should have been to merge or redirect to the main article.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It has received plenty of coverage, and the parent article, Skyrim, is rather large, so it seems like a legitimate split. I'd say the article's existence is warranted per the WP:GNG and WP:TOOBIG. Sergecross73 msg me 19:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw: This article definitely meets the criteria. I was meaning to nominate Hearthfire, but upon thinking about it I believe that it is notable enough. Tractor Tyres (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.