Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riya Sharma (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Riya Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

possibly WP:TOOSOON but this is a non-notable photographer which is only sourced to a piece from an awarding org (whose award itself is not notable) and a puff piece from Asian Voice. The rest of the sources that were in the external link list are largely unreliable, brand pieces/pr CUPIDICAE💕 20:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete pretty much all of the coverage I could find is clearly paid for. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'm finding tons of social media, but nothing in the way of sigcov in reliable sources to substantiate notability. Fails WP:GNG Netherzone (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NARTIST fail. Possibly (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all the "awards" she supposedly has won are pay-to-win or don't exist. There is no such thing as the "21st century art book of the year" award, for example. Vexations (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - does not meet any relevant SNG and has no coverage in reliable, independent sources so clearly fails GNG. This article just goes to show that the word 'influencer' is one of the most overused (and misused) words of the century. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. No reliable, independent sources... --Kemalcan (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Setreis (talk) 06:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Vanity article. RationalPuff (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. a non notable artist. Niceguylucky (talk) 09:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per User:GLP93. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 03:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete and salt for around 2-3 months. Article most probably paid, or an auto-bio. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.