Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Urman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Urman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing how this person can pass WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Run of the mill medical person. Edwardx (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination; the article reads more like a promotional biography entry rather than a neutral Wikipedia one.TH1980 (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein ^talk 11:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 06:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet either WP:BASIC or WP:NPROF. Promotional 'cruft. --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NPROF, I would say the award they won is not independently notable and does seem to be a well covered or prestigious award (despite that the article about the award claims as such). Couldn't find any reliable secondary source that actually linked him to the award. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 01:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.