Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raees Movie 2015

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:A10 by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:30, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Raees Movie 2015

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As the article itself says, principal photography not yet commenced, so the article obviously fails WP:NFF. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as premature per the notability guidelines for future films. Also, Raees (film) already exists and should be deleted per the same rationale, as I stated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fan (film). Erik (talk | contribs) 21:23, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DONE Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per being TOO SOON and, while being covered in sources, does not have the persistant and enduring coverage to merit being an exception ro WP:NFF paragraph 3. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's just too soon for an entry. I have no problem with userfication, if anyone wants to go that route. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.