Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qmee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:38, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Qmee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a non-notable website created by a new editor with no other edits. The article sources are personal blogs, company profile websites and affiliated websites with no evidence of editorial oversight. Fails WP:WEBCRIT. - MrX 12:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I see no evidence of notability.Deb (talk) 13:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Links to paid advertising and websites connected to the subject are not sufficient to meet verifiable information requirement. A bit promotional in tone. Not sure what a rewrite would leave behind. Dlohcierekim 15:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. nn. website. jni (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:WEB pretty clearly. --CyberXRef^talk 16:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 17:56, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The Google search I just ran returned a lot of forum and blog posts. None of which help it to meet WP:N. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.